Developing Metacognitive Writing Strategy to Enhance Writing Skills Viewed from Prospective Teachersâ€™ Critical Thinking Skills
Keywords:metacognitive strategy, writing skill, critical thinking skill
The metacognitive awareness and critical thinking skills were essential to be subjected to the prospective teachers to regulate their learning and train how to practice writing effectively. This study was aimed at developing the model of the metacognitive writing strategy to improve prospective teachersâ€™ writing skills viewed from critical thinking skills in Indonesian higher education. To attain the research aim, the research and development (R&D) study was employed. The stages of R&D design included defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. To attest to the effectiveness of the metacognitive writing strategy, the researcher used a quasi-experimental design in the form of pre-test and post-test control group design. The prospective teachers were divided into two groups, the experimental and control group. The experimental group was treated using the metacognitive writing strategy, while the control group was taught using the conventional strategy. The instruments of collecting data used the metacognitive writing test and critical thinking test. Then, the data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistical devices. The results of the study showed that the metacognitive writing strategy can help prospective teachers to regulate their learning activities in terms of what and how to write in the class. At the top of that, they are able to compose good exposition texts. It was proven that the average score of learners in the experimental class was higher than those on the control class. The research findings were elaborated in the research discussion.
Aghajani, M., & Gholamrezapour, E. (2019). Critical thinking skills, critical reading and foreign language reading anxiety in Iran context. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12414a
Backer, L. De, & Keer, H. Van. (2015). Examining evolutions in the adoption of metacognitive regulation in reciprocal peer tutoring groups. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-015-9141-7
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M. (2014). Task, task performance, and writing development. In R. M. Manchón, & H. Byrnes (Eds.). Task-based language learning-insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 267–299). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cálix, L. A. L. (2015). Raising metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic readers and writers. University of Groningen. Doctoral dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/11370/a58d30bd-d1de-4822-af95-3d2ef5a38b3f
Cetin, P. S., Eymur, G., Southerland, S., Walker, J. & Whittington, K (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of engagement in a broad range of disciplinary practices on learning of Turkish high-school chemistry students. International Journal of Science Education, 40(5), 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1432914
Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H. O., & Cam, A. (2017). Argumentation to foster pre-service science teachers’ knowledge, competency, and attitude on the domains of chemical literacy of acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18, 28-30
Desstya, A., Prasetyo, Z. K., Suyanta, Susila, I., & Irwanto. (2019). Developing an instrument to detect science misconception of an Elementary school teacher. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12313a
Dulger, O. (2011). Meta-cognitive strategies in developing EFL writing skills. Contemporary Online Language Educational Journal, 1(2), 21-25
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277
Ennis, R.H. (2013). The Nature of Critical Thinking: Outlines of General Critical
Thinking Dispositions and Abilities (Online), Available: http://www.criticalthinking. (Accessed August, 2018).
Erenler, S. & Cetin, P.S. (2019). Utilizing argument-driven-inquiry to develop pre-service teachers’ metacognitive awareness and writing skills. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 5 (2), 628-638.
Fisher, A. (2009). Critical Thinking: An introduction. Trans. Benyamin Hadinata. Jakarta: Erlangga
Fukuta, J., Tamura, Y., & Kawaguchi, Y. (2019): Written languaging
with indirect feedback in writing revision: is feedback always effective?, Language Awareness, https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1567742
Geertsen, D. F. (2003). Rethinking thinking about higher-level thinking. Teaching Sociology, 31(1): 1–19.
Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334–372 https://doi.org/10.3102%2F003465430303953
Haerazi, H., Irwansyah, D., Juanda, J., & Azis, Y. A. (2018). Incorporating Intercultural Competences in Developing English Materials for Writing Classes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 540-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0903.13
Haerazi, H., & Irawan, L. A. (2019). Practicing Genre-Based Language Teaching Model to Improve Students’ Achievement of Writing Skills. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 4(1), 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.246
Johanson, J. & Brookfield, S. (2010). Cultivating critical thinking: An interview with Stephen Brookfield. Journal of Developmental Education, 33 (3): 26–30 www.jstor.org/stable/42775691
Kizilcec R.F., Pérez-Sanagustín M., & Maldonado J. J. (2016). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in massive open online courses, Computers & Education, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.001
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Pcyhological Science, 9(5) pp. 178-181. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-8721.00088
Kuncel, N. R. (2011). Measurement and meaning of critical thinking (research report for the NRC 21st century skills workshop). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Lampert, N. (2011). A study of an after-school art program and critical thinking. International Journal of Education through Art,7(1) pp. 55-67
MacArthur, C. A., & Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive perspective. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.). Handbook of writing research (pp. 24–40). New York/London: Guilford Press.
Maftoon, P., Birjandi, P. & Farahian, M. (2014). Investigating Iranian EFL learners’ writing metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 3(5), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.896
Maftoon, P., & Seyyedrezaei, S.H. (2012). Good language learner: A case study of writing strategies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1597-1602.
Magno, C. (2010). Korean students’ language learning strategies and years of studying English as predictors of proficiency in English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marcel V. J. V., Bernadette, H. A. M. V. & Peter, A. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610500479991
Michel, M., Kormos, J., Brunfaut, T., & Ratajczak, M. (2019). The role of working memory in young second language learners’ written performances. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45 (2019) 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.002
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: to what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning?. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9045-5
Moza A., Abdo M, A., Thuwayba A., & Abdulraheim, A. (2019). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy instruction on Omani grade 11 EFL learners’ listening comprehension and their metacognitive listening awareness. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 18(9), pp. 256-275, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.14
Mursyid, M., & Kurniawati, N. (2019). Higher order thinking skills among English teachers across generation in EFL classroom. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1775
Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102–116
Negretti, R. (2017). Calibrating genre: Metacognitive judgments and rhetorical effectiveness in academic writing by L2 graduate students. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 512–539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv051
Nosratinia, M., Ghavidel, S., & Zaker, A. (2015). Teaching metacognitive strategies through Anderson’s Model: Does it affect EFL learners’ listening
comprehension?. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(6), 1233-1243.
Ohtani, K. & Hisasaka, T. (2018). Beyond intelligence: a meta-analytic review of the relationship among metacognition, intelligence, and academic performance, Metacognition and Learning, 13(2), 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9183-8
Olive, T. (2012). Working memory in writing. In V. Berninger (Ed.). Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 485–503). New York: Psychology Press.
Oxford, R. L. (2006). Language learning strategies. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Oxford, R. L. (2013). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson.
Oz, H. (2016). The importance of personality traits in students’ perceptions of metacognitive awareness. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 232, 655-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.090
Patel, N. K. (2018). Effect of Integrated Feedback on Classroom Climate of Secondary School Teachers, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7.i1.11146
Pikkert, J., & Bays, L. (2015). Critical thinking skills among third year Indonesian English students. RELC Journal, 27: 56–64
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
Pu, S., & Evans, M. (2019). Critical thinking in the context of Chinese postgraduate students’ thesis writing: a positioning theory perspective. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1442473
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: The nature of critical and creative
thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 30(2), 34–35.
Rahimirad, M. (2014). The impact of metacognitive strategy instruction on the listening performance of university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98, 1485-1491.
Ralston, P. A., and L. Bays. (2015). Critical thinking development in undergraduate engineering students from freshman through senior year: A 3-Cohort longitudinal study. American Journal of Engineering Education, 6(2): 85–98.
Ramli, Mukminatien, N., Saukah, A., & Prayogo, J. A. (2019). Word Recognition from Speech, Syntactic Knowledge, Metacognitive Awareness, Self-Efficacy as determination for L2 Listening Comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1236a
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M.-J. (2017). Investigating IELTS Academic writing Task 2; Relationships between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory. Retrieved from: Australia: British Council, Cambridge English Language Assessment and IDP. https://www.ielts.org/teaching-and research/researchreports/ielts_
Sandi?Urena, S., Melanie M., Cooper, & Stevens, R. H. (2011)
Enhancement of metacognition use and awareness by means of a collaborative intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 33:3, 323-340, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690903452922
Sampson V. and Walker J., (2012), Argument-Driven Inquiry as a way to help undergraduate students write to learn by learning to write in chemistry, International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1443–1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667581
Schnotz, W. (1992). Metacognition and self-regulation in text processing: Some comments. In M. Carretero, M. L. Pope, R. J. Simons, & J. I. Pozo (Eds.), Learning and instruction. European research in an international context, Vol. 3 (pp. 365–375). Elsmford, NY: Pergamon Press
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36,111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Shaarawy, H. Y. (2014). The effect of journal writing on students’ cognitive critical thinking skills: A quasi-experimental research on English as a foreign language (EFL) undergraduate classroom in Egypt. International Journal of Higher Education, 3 (4), pp 120–128. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p120
Sinaga, P. & Feranie, S. (2017). Enhancing critical thinking skills and writing skills through the variation in non-traditional writing task. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1025a
Suratno, Komaria, N., Yushardi, Dafik, & Wicaksono, I. (2019). The effect of using synectics model on creative thinking and metacognition skills of junior high school students. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1239a
Suryanti, Arifin, I. S. Z., & Baginda, U. (2018). The application of inquiry learning to train critical thinking skills on light material of primary school students. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1108, (2018) 012128. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012128
Tam, N. T. M., & Linh, N. T. T. (2017). Influence of explicit higher-order thinking skills instruction on students’ learning of linguistics. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.004
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). Fostering strategic learning: The development and validation of the writing strategies for motivational regulation questionnaire (WSMRQ). Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0243-4
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning
of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition and Learning, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4
Tucel, T. Cakiroglu, J. and Oztekin, C., (2015). Exploring the Effects of Science Writing Heuristic Approach on 8th Grade Students' Metacognition. Paper presented at European Science Education Research Association Conference.
Tuysuzoglu, B. B., & Greene, J. A. (2014). An investigation of the role of contingent metacognitive behavior in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9126-y
Ulu, C. (2011). The effect of using inquiry based approach known as the science writing heuristic on concept learning, science process and metacognition skills in science teaching. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Marmara University, ?stanbul.
Veenman, M. V. J., Prins, F. J., & Elshout, J. J. (2002). Initial learning in a complex computer simulated environment: The role of metacognitive skills and intellectual ability. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00038-3
Veenman, M. V. J., Elshout, J. J., & Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7, 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00025-4
Veliz, L., & Mauricio-Veliz (2018): An interrogation of the role of
critical thinking in English language pedagogy in Chile, Teaching in Higher Education, 0(0), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1456424
Wang, J., Spencer, K., & Xing, M. (2009). Metacognitive beliefs and strategies in
learning Chinese as a foreign language. System, 37(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.05.001
Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15–32). New York: Routledge.
Worden, D. (2018). Balancing stability and ?exibility in genre-based writing
instruction: A case study of a novice L2 writing teacher. Journal of Second Language Writing, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.003
Yeh, H. C. (2015). Facilitating metacognitive processes of academic genre-based writing using an online writing system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 479–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881384
Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, D. (2013). Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning, teaching, and research: Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective. Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, 369, 111–121
Zhang, Z. (2011). A nested model of academic writing approaches: Chinese international graduate students’ views of English academic writing. Language and Literacy, 13(1), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.20360/G27G6R
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego: Academic Press.
Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher order thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000048332.39591.e3
Zohar, A. & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education. New York: Pearson.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Mohammad Kazemian, Lalu Ari Irawan, Haerazi Haerazi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JoLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JoLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.