Students’ Phonological Awareness and Their Strategy in Pronuncing Words

Authors

  • Tri Sekar Buana Faculty of Culture, Management, and Business, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jl. Pemuda No. 59A, Mataram 83125, Indonesia
  • Lalu Ari Irawan Faculty of Culture, Management, and Business, Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika, Jl. Pemuda No. 59A, Mataram 83125, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/ejolls.v1i1.528

Keywords:

phonological awareness, pronouncing words

Abstract

The result of the study revealed that the students have difficulties in pronouncing words that wre categorized into three parts, those were consonant, vowel, and diphthong. In consonant, the students made errors /p/, /b/, /d?/, /z/, /f/, /v/, /d/, /s/, /r/, /k/, /?/, /t/, /ð/,/?/.  In vowels, the students made errors /?/, /æ/, /e/, /?/, /?/, /?/, /i:/, /?/. In diphthong, the students made error /a?/, /??/, /??/, /??/, /a?/. Furthermore, the students’ strategy in their reading activity was categorized into three namely low, middle, and high categories.  For low category, the strategy in reading activity was by checking the difficult word in a dictionary, asking the lecture how to pronoun the difficult word, and practicing to read the word continuously. For middle category, the strategy in reading activity was by doing repetition to every single word, listening the pronunciation of the words using u-dictionary, and always practicing to pronounce every single word. For high category, the strategy in reading activity was guessing based on their knowledge pronunciation and make a relation with the word that the same sounds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (3th ed.). USA: Prentice Hall.

Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi:10.1191/

Carr philip. 1993. Modern linguistics series. London; The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. Inc.

Frankel, J. R., & Wallen, E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw Hill.

Readford & Andrew (2009). Linguistics An Introduction. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Daniel Hirst and Albert Di Cristo. 1998. Intonation Systems. United kingdom at the university Press, Cambridge.

Castro ME. Aquisição do onset complexo no desenvolvimento fonológico típico em crianças entre 2;6 e 5;11 de idade, estudantes de uma creche-escola municipal de Maceió-AL. [Dissertação] Maceió (AL): Universidade Federal de Alagoas; 2015.

Mezzomo CL, Vargas DZ, Cuti LK, Lopes SG. The intervening variables in the production of consonant clusters by syllabic analysis. Rev. CEFAC. 2013;15(5):1247-58.

Daniel, J. (1986). The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge University Press.

Gilbert, Judy B. 2008. Teaching Pronunciation: Using the Prosody Pyramid. Cambridge University Press. USA.

Geudens, A. (2006). Phonological awareness and learning to read a first language: controversies and new perspectives 25-44. In: van de Craats I, Kurvers J, Young-Scholten M (Eds.) Low-Educated Second Language and Literacy Acquisition. Proceedings of the Inaugural Symposium.Tilburg University August 2005, Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT.

Shah, S. (2000). Home Literacy and Phonological Awareness as Predictors of Reading Ability.The UCI Undergraduate Research Journal, 55-63. [Online] Available: http://www.urop.uci.edu/journal/journal00/pagemaker_pdf_export/06_sheela.pdf

Denton, C.A., Hasbrouck, J. E., Weaver, L. R., & Riccio, C. A. (2000). What do we know about phonological awareness in Spanish? Reading Psychology, 21, 335–352. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/027027100750061958.

Justice, L.M., Bowles, R.P., & Skibbe, L.E. (2006). Measuring preschool attainment of print-concept knowledge: a study of typical and at-risk 3- to 5-year-old children using item response theory. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 3, 224-35. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1044/0161-1461(2006/024)

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s metaanalysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250– 287

Good, H. R., & Kaminski, R. A. [Eds.]. (2007). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Assessment. Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-30

How to Cite

Buana, T. S., & Irawan, L. A. (2021). Students’ Phonological Awareness and Their Strategy in Pronuncing Words. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.36312/ejolls.v1i1.528

Issue

Section

Articles