Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inquiry-Creative-Process (ICP) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Calon Guru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v4i1.151Keywords:
Critical thinking ability, Inquiry-Creative-Process learning model, Kemampuan berpikir kritis, Model pembelajaran Inquiry-Creative-ProcessAbstract
Mengajar berpikir kritis kepada mahasiswa calon guru telah menjadi perhatian dalam beberapa dekade terakhir dan pembelajaran menggunakan model yang spesifik mempromosikan berpikir kritis mahasiswa calon guru penting dikonduksikan dan dieksplorasi dampaknya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi efek model pembelajaran Inquiry-Creative-Proces (ICP) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis pada mahasiswa calon guru. Penelitian eksperimen dengan desain one group pretest-posttest dikonduksikan, melibatkan 16 mahasiswa calon guru fisika di Universitas Mataram sebagai sampel penelitian. Kemampuan berpikir kritis diukur menggunakan instrumen tes sebanyak 8 item soal essay. Instrumen tes yang digunakan telah teruji validitas dan reliabilitasnya. Data kemampuan berpikir kritis dianalisis secara deskriptif dan statistik di mana uji homogenitas, uji normalitas, dan uji-t dikonduksikan. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran ICP berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa calon guru.
The Effect of Inquiry-Creative-Process Learning Model (ICP) on Prospective Teacher Students’ Critical Thinking Ability
Abstract
Teaching critical thinking to prospective teacher has been a concern in the last few decades and learning using specific models to train critical thinking prospective teachers is important to be conditioned and explored their impact. This study aims to explore the effect of Inquiry-Creative-Process (ICP) learning model on prospective teacher’s critical thinking ability. The experimental research with one group pretest-posttest design was conducted, involving 16 physics prospective teachers at Universitas Mataram as a research sample. Critical thinking ability were measured using 8 essay test items. The test instrument used has been tested for validity and reliability. The data of critical thinking ability were analyzed descriptively and statistically where homogeneity test, normality test, and t-test are conducted. The results showed that the ICP learning model affected to the prospective teacher’s critical thinking ability.
Downloads
References
Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M.A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1102-1134.
Adams, K. (2006). The Sources of Innovation and Creativity. National Center on Education and Economy. USA.
Aktamis, H. & Ergin, O. (2008). The Effect of scientific proccess skill education on student’s scientific creativity, science attitudes, and academic achivements. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9, 1-21.
Arends, R. (2012). Learning to teach (9th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ashton P. (1988). Teaching higher-order thinking and content: an essential ingredient in teacher preparation. Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
Ayas, B. & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of Scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative Scientific ability test. Elsevier: Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195–205.
Bahtiar, & Prayogi, S. (2012). Evaluasi hasil pembelajaran sains (IPA). Mataram: CV. Dimensi Raya.
Bensley, D.A., & Murtagh, M.P. (2012). Guidelines for a scientific approach to critical thinking assessment. Teaching Psychology, 39, 5-16.
Bissell, A.N. & Lemons, P.P. (2006). A new method for assessing critical thinking in the classroom. BioScience, 56(1), 66-72.
Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation skills for effective teaching. Columbus, OH: Merrill
Ennis, R.H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10.
Fahim, M. & Masouleh, N.S. (2012). Critical thinking in higher education: a pedagogical look. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1370-1375.
Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill
Glassner, A., & Schwartz, B. (2007). What stands and develops between creative and criatical thinking? Argumentation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 10-18.
Grohman, M., Wodniecka, Z., & Klusak, M. (2006). Divergent thinking and evaluation skills: Do they always go together? Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(2), 125–145.
Hake, R.R., (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Retrieved from <http://lists.asu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9903&L=aera-d&P=R6855>
Halpern, D.F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455.
Hu, W., Shi, Q.Z., Han, Q., Wang, X. & Adey, P. (2010). Creative Scientific problem finding and Its developmental trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 1-7.
Hu, W. & Adey, P. (2010). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal for Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.
Kousoulas, F., & Mega, G. (2008). Creative and critical thinking in the context of problem finding and problem solving: A research among students in primary school. Retrieved from http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/021/vol1/011/ecp2107011.pdf
Koray, Ö., Köksal, M. S., Özdemir, M., & Presley, A. I. (2007). The effect of creative and critical thinking based laboratory applications on academic achievement and science process skills. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 377-389.
Koray, Ö. & Köksal, M.S. (2009). The effect of creative and critical thinking based laboratory applications on creative and logical thinking abilities of prospective teachers. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1-13.
Lee, A.T., Hairston, R.V., Thames, R., Lawrence, T. & Herron, S.S. (2002). Using a computer simulation to teach science process skills to college biology and elementary education majors. Computer Simulations Bioscene, 28(4), 35- 42.
McPeck, J. (1990). Teaching critical thinking: Dialogue & dialectic. New York: Routledge.
Mitrevski, B. & Zajkov, O. (2011). Mathematics and science teachers’ concept of critical thinking. Bulgaria Journal of Physics, 38, 318-324.
Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., Robledo, I., Peterson, D. R., Day, E. A., Hougen, D. F., et al. (2012). Mental models and creative problem solving: The relationships of objective and subjective model attributes. Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 311–330.
Padget, S. (2013). Creativity and critical thinking. New York: Routledge.
Philley, J. (2005). Critical thinking concepts. Professional Safety, 50, 26-32.
Prayogi, S. Yuanita, L., & Wasis. (2018). Critical Inquiry Based Learning: Model of learning to promote critical thinking ability of pre-service teachers. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 947 1-6.
Prayogi, S., Muhali, Yuliyanti, S., Asy’ari, M., Azmi, I. & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2019). The effect of presenting anomalous data on improving student’s critical thinking ability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(6), 133-137. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i06.9717
Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L. & Wasis. (2018). Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning: A model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43-56. doi: 10.12973/tused.10220a
Schmaltz, R. M., Jansen. E, & Wenckowski, N. (2017). Redefining critical thinking: Teaching students to think like scientists. Front. in Psych, 8 (459), 1-4.
Scott, S. (2008). Perceptions of students' learning critical thinking through debate in a technology classroom: A case study. Jour. of Tech. Stud, 34(1), 39-44.
Sendag S., Erol O., Sezgin S., & Dulkadir N. (2015). Preservice teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and web 2.0 competencies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 172-187.
Šorgo, A. (2012). Scientific Creativity: The Missing Ingredient in Slovenian Science Education. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 127-141.
Thompson, C. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: Process over output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), 1-7.
Thomas T. (2011). Developing first year students’ critical thinking skills. Asian Social Science, 7(4): 26-35.
Tiruneh, D.T., DeCock, M., Weldeslassie, A.G., Elen, J. & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring critical thinking in physics: Development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematic Education, 15, 663-682
Türkmen, H. & Sertkahya, M. (2015). Creative thinking skills analysis of vocational high school students. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 5(1), 74-84.
Wahyudi, Verawati, N.N.S.P., Ayub, S., & Prayogi. (2018). Development of inquiry-creative-process learning model to promote critical thinking ability of physics prospective teachers. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1108, 1-6. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012005
Warburton E. C. (2008). Changes in dance teachers’ beliefs about critical thinking activities. Journal of Education and Human Development, 2(1), 1-16.
Wechsler, S.M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S.F., Vendramini C.M.M., Almeida L.S., Mundim M.C., & Franco A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114-122
Weltzer-Ward, L.M. & Carmona, G. (2008). Support of the critical thinking process in synchronous online collaborative discussion through model-eliciting activities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 3(3), 86-88.
Zane, T. (2013). Implementing critical thinking with signature assignments. Salt Lake Community College, Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: e-Saintika, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
