Ontologi dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan Mengenai Hakikat Tuhan, Manusia, dan Alam: Sebuah Literatur Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v5i1.1906Keywords:
Filsafat, Ontology, Tuhan, Manusia, AlamAbstract
Manusia memiliki keingintahuan yang mendalam tidak hanya tentang alam sekitar dan hakikat dirinya sendiri, tetapi juga tentang esensi dari Tuhan serta hubungan antara Tuhan, alam, dan manusia. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mereview konsep ontologi dalam ilmu pengetahuan yang mengeksplorasi hakikat dari Tuhan, manusia, dan alam. Metode yang digunakan dalam studi ini adalah review literatur. Secara umum, review literatur dapat digambarkan sebagai metode yang sistematis untuk mengumpulkan dan mensintesis penelitian yang telah ada sebelumnya. Studi ini mengkaji berbagai artikel dari jurnal, dan publikasi lainnya. Hasil kajian ini diperoleh melalui pencarian di Google Scholar dan Scopus, pencarian ini dipilih karena relevansinya dengan topik yang sedang dibahas. Untuk memilih artikel referensi yang paling tepat, studi ini menggunakan pendekatan yang menyeimbangkan antara relevansi, cakupan, dan keragaman referensi. Studi ini membahas bagaimana ontologi memaknai hakikat Tuhan. Proses pemahaman ini dimulai dari pertimbangan materi atau kebenaran, yaitu melalui pemikiran tentang keberadaan Tuhan. Keberadaan Tuhan dapat dipahami dengan melihat ciptaan-Nya, seperti makhluk hidup dan alam semesta. Semua ini, yang terbentuk secara kompleks dan sempurna, menunjukkan adanya Zat yang Maha Sempurna sebagai penciptanya. Selanjutnya, manusia, sebagai makhluk berakal, mampu memahami dan melihat bukti keberadaan alam yang menunjukkan adanya Tuhan. Manusia juga memahami dirinya sebagai makhluk ciptaan Tuhan, sesuai dengan teori ontologis tentang eksistensi. Dengan mengamati ciptaan-Nya yang kompleks dan sempurna, kita dapat menarik kesimpulan tentang adanya Zat yang Maha Sempurna sebagai pencipta. Selain itu, manusia, sebagai makhluk berakal, memiliki kemampuan untuk memahami dan menafsirkan bukti-bukti keberadaan Tuhan yang termanifestasi dalam alam. Hal ini membantu manusia dalam memahami posisi sebagai makhluk ciptaan dan mengapresiasi hubungan yang lebih dalam antara Tuhan, manusia, dan alam. Dengan demikian, pendekatan ontologi tidak hanya memperluas pemahaman kita tentang Tuhan tetapi juga memperkuat hubungan intrinsik antara keberadaan manusia dan alam semesta.
Ontology in Science Concerning the Nature of God, Humans, and Nature: A Literature Review
Abstract
Human beings possess a profound curiosity not only about the natural world and their own essence, but also about the essence of God and the relationships between God, nature, and humans. This article aims to review the concept of ontology in science that explores the essence of God, humans, and nature. The method used in this study is a literature review. Generally, a literature review can be described as a systematic method for collecting and synthesizing previous research. This study examines various articles from journals and other publications. The findings of this study were obtained through searches in Google Scholar and Scopus, chosen for their relevance to the topic under discussion. To select the most appropriate reference articles, this study uses an approach that balances relevance, coverage, and diversity of references. This study discusses how ontology interprets the essence of God. The understanding process begins with material considerations or truth, that is, through thinking about the existence of God. The existence of God can be understood by observing His creations, such as living beings and the universe. All of this, formed in a complex and perfect manner, indicates the presence of a Most Perfect Being as its creator. Furthermore, humans, as rational beings, are able to understand and see evidence of the existence of nature that indicates the presence of God. Humans also understand themselves as creations of God, in accordance with ontological theories about existence. By observing His complex and perfect creations, we can draw conclusions about the presence of a Most Perfect Being as the creator. Additionally, humans, as rational beings, have the ability to understand and interpret evidence of the existence of God manifested in nature. This helps humans understand their position as created beings and appreciate a deeper relationship between God, humans, and nature. Thus, the ontological approach not only expands our understanding of God but also strengthens the intrinsic relationship between human existence and the universe.
Downloads
References
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories. Sage Open, 9(1), 2158244019829575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
Albadri, P. B., Ramadani, R., Amanda, R., Nurisa, N., Safika, R., & Harahap, S. S. (2023). Ontologi Filsafat. PRIMER?: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(3), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.55681/primer.v1i3.148
Aswani, S., Basurto, X., Ferse, S., Glaser, M., Campbell, L., Cinner, J. E., Dalton, T., Jenkins, L. D., Miller, M. L., Pollnac, R., Vaccaro, I., & Christie, P. (2018). Marine resource management and conservation in the Anthropocene. Environmental Conservation, 45(2), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000431
Azevêdo, E. de L., Alves, R. R. N., Dias, T. L. P., Álvaro, É. L. F., Barbosa, J. E. de L., & Molozzi, J. (2022). Perception of the local community: What is their relationship with environmental quality indicators of reservoirs? PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0261945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261945
Bachri, A. S., Khoiriyah, A. S., & Baihaqi, I. (2024). Student Friendly Education Concepts of Humanism and Implementation in Teaching and Learning Process. Majemuk: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 1(1), 55–70.
Baharudin, M. (2014). Konsepsi Ketuhanan Sepanjang Sejarah Manusia. Al-Adyan, XI, 35–58.
Bahrum, B. (2013). Ontologi, Epistemologi Dan Aksiologi. Sulesana Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman, 8(2), 35–45.
Batubara, A. H. A. & Salminawati. (2022). Pengertian Ontologi dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Islam. Journal Of Social Research, 1(4), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v1i4.72
Beckermann, A. (2010). Darwin – What if Man is Only an Animal, After All? Dialectica, 64(4), 467–482.
Cantore, E. (1971). Humanistic Significance of Science: Some Methodological Considerations. Philosophy of Science, 38(3), 395–412.
Cao, L. (2015). Ontological Engineering. In L. Cao (Ed.), Metasynthetic Computing and Engineering of Complex Systems (pp. 243–266). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6551-4_12
Carman, T. (1999). The Body in Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Philosophical Topics, 27(2), 205–226.
Chokwitthaya, C., Zhu, Y., & Lu, W. (2023). Ontology for experimentation of human-building interactions using virtual reality. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 55, 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.101903
Colb, S. F., & Dorf, M. C. (2022). “If we didn’t eat them, they wouldn’t exist” The Nonidentity Problem’s Implications for Animals (Including Humans). American Journal of Law and Equality, 2, 247–284. https://doi.org/10.1162/ajle_a_00038
Dane, E., Baer, M., Pratt, M. G., & Oldham, G. R. (2011). Rational versus intuitive problem solving: How thinking “off the beaten path” can stimulate creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017698
Daponte, V., & Falquet, G. (2021). An ontology for the formalization and visualization of scientific knowledge (arXiv:2107.04347). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.04347
Darwis, D. (2014). Metafisika Ibnu Sina dan Idealisme Hegel (Sebuah Studi Komparatif). UIN Alaudding Mak.
Dewi, R. S. (2021). Ilmu Dalam Tinjauan Filsafat: Ontologi, Epistemologi, Dan Aksiologi. CENDEKIA?: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 7(2), 177–183.
Ecklund, E. H., Johnson, D. R., Scheitle, C. P., Matthews, K. R. W., & Lewis, S. W. (2016). Religion among Scientists in International Context: A New Study of Scientists in Eight Regions. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 2, 237802311666435. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116664353
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. Sage Open, 4(1), 2158244014522633. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
El-Yunusi, M. Y. M., Yasmin, P., & Mubarok, L. (2023). Ontologi Filsafat Pendidikan Islam (Studi Kasus: Bahan Ajar Penerapan Literasi pada Peserta Didik). JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(9), 6614–6624. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i9.2800
el-Zein, A. H. (1977). Beyond Ideology and Theology: The Search for the Anthropology of Islam. Annual Review of Anthropology, 6, 227–254.
Ermida, E., & Ardimen, A. (2023). Ontologi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Journal on Education, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3396
Ermisa, E., & Ya Zulfah, A. (2023). Ontologi Ilmu Pengetahuan. Journal on Education, 6(1), 3306–3312. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3396
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Hubungan Filsafat dengan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Relevansinya Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 (Society 5.0). Jurnal Filsafat, 31(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.42521
Fatonah, F., Ismail, I., Adimarta, T., Sholiha, M., Darmansyah, R., Fardinal, F., Yanfaunnas, Y., Tunggal Prastetyo, B., & Gusmahansyah, R. (2022). The Contribution Of The Philosophy Of Science In Research Science And Social Life. Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 4(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijms.v4i1.1401
Fung, Y. (2010). On the Very Idea of Correlative Thinking. Philosophy Compass, 5(4), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00294.x
Gilson, E., & Elrington, G. A. (1972). The Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas Authorised Translation From the 3D Rev. Ed. Of “le Thomisme,” by Étienne Gilson. [Translated by Edward Bullough. Edited by G.A. Elrington.]. Folcroft Library Editions.
Gleiser, M. (2017). Cosmic metaphysics: Being versus becoming in cosmology and astrophysics. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 73(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3.4713
Hajaroh, M. (2021). High order thinking skill sebagai landasan dalam pengembangan asesmen dan evaluasi pendidikan. FOUNDASIA, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.21831/foundasia.v12i2.47332
Harahap, N., & Lubis, S. D. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. IO Publisher.
Hasmiansyah, R., Fauzan, A., & Samsudin, M. (2021). Analisis Pemikiran Psikologi Islam (Studi Terhadap Konsep Psikologi Islam Dalam Pandangan Hasan Langgulung). Jurnal Diversita, 7(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v7i1.4666
Havea, J., Tomlinson, M., Al-Azem, T., Rasanayagam, J., Juewei, V., Mair, J., Bongmba, E. K., Haynes, N., Lamb, R., Sivakumar, D., Furani, K., & Moosa, E. (2022). Dialogues: Anthropology and theology. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 28(1), 297–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13667
Hocker, J., Schindler, C., & Rittberger, M. (2020). Participatory design for ontologies: A case study of an open science ontology for qualitative coding schemas. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4), 671–685. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2019-0320
Hofweber, T. (2023). Ambitious, Yet Modest, Metaphysics. In D. Chalmers, D. Manley, & R. Wasserman (Eds.), Metametaphysics (pp. 260–289). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199546046.003.0009
Huemer, M. (2023). The Reality of Knowledge. In Can We Know Anything? https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003434931-3
Jabri, V. (2023). Ontology, relationality and an alternative reading of ‘difference.’ Journal of International Political Theory, 19(3), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882231181610
Jacquette, D. (2002). Ontology (Vol. 7). Routledge.
Joki?, B., & Puri?, D. (2019). Relating Rational and Experiential Thinking Styles With Trait Emotional Intelligence in Broader Personality Space. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1692
Kartikasari, D., Medriati, R., & Purwanto, A. (2018). Penerapan Discovery Learning Model dengan Pendekatan Saintifik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Konsep Kalor dan Perpindahan Kalor. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 1(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.1.2.1-7
Kattsoff, L. O. (1987). Pengantar Filsafat: Sebuah Buku Pegangan untuk Mengenal Filsafat. Tiara Wacana Yogya.
Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. A. (2019). Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research. In Social Sciences (Vol. 8, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8090255
Keromnes, G., Chokron, S., Celume, M. P., Berthoz, A., Botbol, M., Canitano, R., Boisgueheneuc, F. Du, Jaafari, N., Lavenne-Collot, N., Martin, B., Motillon, T., Thirioux, B., Scandurra, V., Wehrmann, M., Ghanizadeh, A., & Tordjman, S. (2019). Exploring self-consciousness from self- and other-image recognition in the mirror: Concepts and evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(MAY), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00719
Khodadadi, H. (2023). Ibn Sina, Divine Simplicity and the Problem of Ineffability. International Journal of Indonesian Philosophy & Theology, 4(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.47043/ijipth.v4i1.44
Kim, D. (2012). Trans-spatiality as the Horizon of the Coming Community: Ethico-ontology and Aesthetics in Asian Immigrant Literature. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Kivunja, C., & Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(5), 26. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26
Lala, I., & Alwazzan, R. (2023). Necessary Existence and Necessary Mercy: Ibn ‘Arab?’s Reformulation of Ibn S?n?’s Ontological Proof. In Religions (Vol. 14, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081016
Luthfiyah, L., & Lhobir, A. (2023). Ontologi , Epistimologi dan Aksiologi Filsafat Pendidikan. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(5), 3249–3254. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.6150
Madina, B., Saltanat, A., Gulnaz, Z., Yuriy, V., Ainur, A., Akmaral, J., Meruyert, K., & Roza, B. (2023). Application of ontology-based engineering and stem approach in learning. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 31(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v31.i1.pp440-450
Mayer, T. (2001). IBN S?N?’S “BURH?N AL-SIDD?Q?N.” Journal of Islamic Studies, 12(1), 18–39.
Naragon, S. S. (1987). Reason And Animals: Descartes, Kant, And Mead on The Place of Humans In Nature. In Tetrahedron Letters (Vol. 28, Issue 21). University of Notre Dame.
Octaviana, dila rukmi, & Ramadhani, reza aditya. (2021). Hakikat Manusia: Pengetahuan (Knowladge), Ilmu Pengetahuan (Sains), Filsafat Dan Agama. Jurnal Tawadhu, 5(2), 143–159.
Octaviana, D. R., & Ramadhani, R. A. (2021). Hakikat Manusia: Pengetahuan (Knowladge), Ilmu Pengetahuan (Sains), Filsafat dan Agama. Jurnal Tawadhu, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.52802/twd.v5i2.227
Pebrina, E. T., Sudiyono, R. N., Suroso, S., Novitasari, D., & Asbari, M. (2022). Adopsi Teknologi Informasi dan Knowledge Sharing: Analisis Mediasi Budaya Organisasi di Perguruan Tinggi. EDUKATIF?: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(1), 1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2223
Peels, R. (2024). Monotheism and Fundamentalism: Prevalence, Potential, and Resilience. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781009309653
Petrenko, M., Cohn, E., Shchurov, O., & Malakhov, K. (2023). Ontology-Driven Computer Systems: Elementary Senses in Domain Knowledge Processing. South African Computer Journal, 35(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v35i2.17445
Qomarudin, A., Maslahah, M., & Maulida, A. Z. (2022). Mystical, Ontological, and Functionalist According to Cornelis Anthonie Van Peursen in The Theory of Philosophy of Science. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(4), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v1i4.1088
Rosida, R. F., Amaliah, L. N., Mahardika, I. K., & Suratno, S. (2023). The process of forming knowledge: In the study of ontology, epistemology, and axiology. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 5(1), 13–18.
Rostitawati, T. (2018). Tuhan, Manusia dan Alam dalam Perspektif Filsafat Islam. Irfani, 14(1), 28–42.
Rosyidah, A., & Wantini. (2021). Tipologi Manusia Dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan: Perspektif Al-Qur’an Surat Fatir Ayat 32. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.2021.vol6(1).6222
Sabil, J. (2014). Masalah Ontologi Dalam Kajian Keislaman. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 13(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v13i2.67
Salim, S., Suryani, I., & Fazira, E. (2020). Ontologi dan Aksiologi Sains Islam. Jurnal Al-Fatih, 3(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.30821/alfatih.v3i1.61
Samidi, S. (2016). Tuhan, Manusia, dan Alam: Analisis Kitab Primbon Atassadhur Adammakna. SHAHIH: Journal of Islamicate Multidisciplinary, 1(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.22515/shahih.v1i1.47
Sanborn, T., & Jung, J. (2021). Intersecting Social Science and Conservation. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.676394
Sari, D. H. N., & Yulisetiani, S. (2023). Integrasi kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam rubric pengetahuan majalah bobo dan implementasinya pada pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia SD. Jurnal Fundadikdas (Fundamental Pendidikan Dasar), 5(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.12928/fundadikdas.v5i3.6296
Selinske, M. J., Garrard, G. E., Bekessy, S. A., Gordon, A., Kusmanoff, A. M., & Fidler, F. (2018). Revisiting the promise of conservation psychology. Conservation Biology, 32(6), 1464–1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13106
Setianingrum, R. (2022). Kerangka Kerja Berpikir Sistem Menggunakan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam sebagai Pengetahuan Konten Sistem Kompleks. Biocaster?: Jurnal Kajian Biologi, 2(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.36312/bjkb.v2i4.129
Seymour, V. (2016). The human-nature relationship and its impact on health: A critical review. Frontiers in Public Health, 4(NOV), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2016.00260
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(July), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Soeprapto, S. (1994). Kedudukan metafisika dalam kawasan keilmuan. Jurnal FIlsafat, 18, 21–25.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2014). The Assessment of Rational Thinking: IQ ? RQ. 41(3), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314537988
Subekti, I., Syukri, A., Badarussyamsi, B., & Fadhil Rizki, A. (2021). Kontribusi Filsafat Ilmu dalam Penelitian Ilmiah dan Kehidupan Sosial. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i3.37304
Supriarno, S., Budiono, A. R., Widagdo, S., & Fadli, Moh. (2020). The position of the relationship between philosophy, philosophy and legal philosophy. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 14, 281–285.
Upenieks, L., Ford-Robertson, J., & Robertson, J. E. (2022). Trust in God and/or Science? Sociodemographic Differences in the Effects of Beliefs in an Engaged God and Mistrust of the COVID-19 Vaccine. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(1), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01466-5
Vitale, G. (2023). Research Methodology. In G. Vitale (Ed.), Understanding Supply Chain Digitalization Through Actor-Network Theory: The Interplay Between Blockchain, Accounting and Management Control (pp. 47–69). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30988-5_3
Welty, C. A., & Jenkins, J. (1999). Formal ontology for subject. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 31(2), 155–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-023X(99)90021-6
Xin, Z., Liu, G., & Zong, Z. (2023). Feeling and Calculation: The Impact of Lay Rationalism Thinking Mode on Mental Budgeting. Current Psychology, 42(30), 26514–26526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03689-5
Yao, J., Carciofo, R., & Pan, L. (2023). Rational thinking as a mediator of the relationship between mindfulness and dental anxiety. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 3104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28879-4
Abidin, Z. (2000). Memahami Manusia Melalui Filsafat. In Remaja Rosda Karya (Issue Bandung, p. Hal 37).
Zainuddin, Z. (2015). Berpikir Deduktif-Induktif dalam Filsafat. In GEMA: Media Informasi dan Kebijakan Kampus. UIN Malang.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wahyu Prihanta, Mutiara Lubis, Joko Widodo, Tobroni Tobroni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
