Analyzing STEM Students’ Critical Thinking Performance: Literacy Study on the Polymer Film Fabrication Process Irradiated with Gamma Rays

Muhammad Roil Bilad; Aris Doyan; Susilawati Susilawati

doi:10.36312/ijece.v1i2.782

Authors

Muhammad Roil Bilad Univeriti Brunei Darussalam
Aris Doyan University of Mataram
Susilawati Susilawati University of Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i2.782

Keywords:

Critical thinking performance, literacy, polymer film fabrication, STEM pedagogy

Abstract

The reliability of pedagogical practice is highly dictated by how it enhances science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’ critical thinking achievement. Adequate pedagogical practice is thus needed in line with the demands of STEM learning in the 21st century, namely achieving optimal critical thinking. This paper reports this pedagogical practice on a topic of polymer film fabrication irradiated with gamma rays. The specific objective was to analyze STEM students’ critical thinking performance in literacy of the aforementioned topic. It is an exploratory study with an experimental method. Only one treatment group was involved, they were STEM students attending the Material Physics Courses. By employing valid critical thinking instruments and adequate methods of analysis, the findings show that literacy on the assigned topic significantly improved STEM students’ CT skills. It was proven that the mean scores of CT indicators have increased in all aspects of the CT assessed. The statistical analysis confirmed that there were significant differences in the CT skills of STEM students between the observations before and after the learning process intervention. The implication of this study is that pedagogical interventions integrated with studies on advanced material modification technology could be effectively used for creating inspiring STEM learning, especially for training STEM students’ critical thinking ways.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Muhammad Roil Bilad, Univeriti Brunei Darussalam

Scopus ID: 36999741400

References

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M. A., Tamim, R., & Zhang, D. (2008). Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326084

Ali, R., Bhadra, J., Siby, N., Ahmad, Z., & Al-Thani, N. J. (2021). A STEM Model to Engage Students in Sustainable Science Education through Sports: A Case Study in Qatar. Sustainability, 13(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063483

Aydin Gunbatar, S., Oztay, E. S., & Ekiz Kiran, B. (2022). Supporting pre-service teachers’ integration of engineering into STEM lessons throughout engineering-infused training. Research in Science & Technological Education, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2121691

Belbase, S., Mainali, B. R., Kasemsukpipat, W., Tairab, H., Gochoo, M., & Jarrah, A. (2021). At the dawn of science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) education: Prospects, priorities, processes, and problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 0(0), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1922943

Bilad, M. R., Anwar, K., & Hayati, S. (2022). Nurturing Prospective STEM Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skill through Virtual Simulation-Assisted Remote Inquiry in Fourier Transform Courses. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijece.v1i1.728

Carmona, H. de P., Chinea, M. E. B., Cabrera, E. G., & Cabrera, J. R. (2022). Brewing Beer from Malt Extract as University Laboratory Experiment to Enhance Chemical Engineering Learning Outcomes Understanding. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 12(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v12i6.31687

Chan, M.-N., & Nagatomo, D. (2022). Study of STEM for Sustainability in Design Education: Framework for Student Learning and Outcomes with Design for a Disaster Project. Sustainability, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010312

Clark, L., Majumdar, S., Bhattacharjee, J., & Hanks, A. C. (2015). Creating an Atmosphere for STEM Literacy in the Rural South Through Student-Collected Weather Data. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-066.1

Costantino, T. (2018). STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973

Davies, M., & Barnett, R. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137378057

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston?: D.C. Heath & Co. http://archive.org/details/howwethink00deweiala

Doyan, A., Susilawati, S., Prayogi, S., Bilad, M. R., Arif, M. F., & Ismail, N. M. (2021). Polymer Film Blend of Polyvinyl Alcohol, Trichloroethylene and Cresol Red for Gamma Radiation Dosimetry. Polymers, 13(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111866

Dreessen, K., & Schepers, S. (2019). Foregrounding backstage activities for engaging children in a FabLab for STEM education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 20, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.02.001

Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2012). The thinker’s guide to intellectual standards: The words that name them and the criteria that define them. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126214

Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Measured Reasons LCC. https://www.insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia/pdf/whatwhy.pdf

Gibson, I. W. (2001). At the intersection of technology and pedagogy: Considering styles of learning and teaching. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390100200102

Grimsdale, A. C., Leok Chan, K., Martin, R. E., Jokisz, P. G., & Holmes, A. B. (2009). Synthesis of Light-Emitting Conjugated Polymers for Applications in Electroluminescent Devices. Chemical Reviews, 109(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr000013v

Guler, E., Soyleyici, H. C., Demirkol, D. O., Ak, M., & Timur, S. (2014). A novel functional conducting polymer as an immobilization platform. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 40, 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.03.063

Hagerman, M. S., Cotnam-Kappel, M., Turner, J.-A., & Hughes, J. M. (2022). Literacies in the Making: Exploring elementary students’ digital-physical meaning-making practices while crafting musical instruments from recycled materials. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1997794

Hake, R., R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Indiana University: Woodland Hills, CA - USA.

Halpern, D. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). An Introduction to Critical Thinking: Maybe It Will Change Your Life. In R. J. Sternberg & D. F. Halpern (Eds.), Critical Thinking in Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–9). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108684354.002

Hartshorne, R., Waring, S. M., & Okraski, H. (2019). Developing Well-informed, Critically Thinking, and Active Citizens Through the Connection of Modeling & Simulation and Social Studies Education. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92(1–2), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2019.1571988

Hi?de, E., & Aktam??, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000

Huang, X., Erduran, S., Zhang, P., Luo, K., & Li, C. (2022). Enhancing teachers’ STEM understanding through observation, discussion and reflection. Journal of Education for Teaching, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.2006571

Hubbard, K. (2021). Disciplinary literacies in STEM: What do undergraduates read, how do they read it, and can we teach scientific reading more effectively? Higher Education Pedagogies, 6(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2021.1882326

Hughes, B. S., Corrigan, M. W., Grove, D., Andersen, S. B., & Wong, J. T. (2022). Integrating arts with STEM and leading with STEAM to increase science learning with equity for emerging bilingual learners in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00375-7

Kang, N.-H. (2019). A review of the effect of integrated STEM or STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics) education in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0034-y

Kim, D., & Bolger, M. (2017). Analysis of Korean Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Changing Attitudes About Integrated STEAM Pedagogy Through Developing Lesson Plans. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9709-3

Kong, S. F., & Mohd Matore, M. E. E. (2022). Can a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach Enhance Students’ Mathematics Performance? Sustainability, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010379

Liao, C. (2019). Creating a STEAM Map: A Content Analysis of Visual Art Practices in STEAM Education. In M. S. Khine & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM Education (pp. 37–55). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_3

Mater, N. R., Haj Hussein, M. J., Salha, S. H., Draidi, F. R., Shaqour, A. Z., Qatanani, N., & Affouneh, S. (2020). The effect of the integration of STEM on critical thinking and technology acceptance model. Educational Studies, 0(0), Article 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1793736

Oyman, G., Geyik, C., Ayranci, R., Ak, M., Odaci Demirkol, D., Timur, S., & Coskunol, H. (2014). Peptide-modified conducting polymer as a biofunctional surface: Monitoring of cell adhesion and proliferation. RSC Adv., 4(96), Article 96. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA08481K

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2018). From STEM to STEAM: Using Brain-Compatible Strategies to Integrate the Arts,. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1300970

Prayogi, S., Ahzan, S., Indriaturrahmi, I., & Rokhmat, J. (2022). Opportunities to Stimulate the Critical Thinking Performance of Preservice Science Teachers Through the Ethno-Inquiry Model in an E Learning Platform. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), Article 9. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/5818

Prayogi, S., & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). The Effect of Conflict Cognitive Strategy in Inquiry-based Learning on Preservice Teachers’ Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), 21, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-pray

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L., & Wasis. (2018). Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning: Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Pre-service Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947, 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012013

Rehan, H. H. (2003). A new polymer/polymer rechargeable battery: Polyaniline/LiClO4(MeCN)/poly-1-naphthol. Journal of Power Sources, 113(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00485-8

Sannasi, V., Jose, T. P., & Jeyakumar, D. (2015). Synthesis and optical properties of poly(2,7-(9,9-dihexylfluorene)-3,3?(4,4?-dialkoxybiphenyl)). Designed Monomers and Polymers, 18(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/15685551.2014.947553

Son, H. J., Wang, W., Xu, T., Liang, Y., Wu, Y., Li, G., & Yu, L. (2011). Synthesis of Fluorinated Polythienothiophene- co -benzodithiophenes and Effect of Fluorination on the Photovoltaic Properties. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 133(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja108601g

Stroud, A., & Baines, L. (2019). Inquiry, Investigative Processes, Art, and Writing in STEAM. In M. S. Khine & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM Education (pp. 1–18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_1

Susilawati, S., Prayogi, S., Arif, M. F., Ismail, N. M., Bilad, M. R., & Asy’ari, M. (2021). Optical Properties and Conductivity of PVA–H3PO4 (Polyvinyl Alcohol–Phosphoric Acid) Film Blend Irradiated by ?-Rays. Polymers, 13(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071065

Taylor, E. (Lily), & Taylor, P. C. (2022). Transformative STEAM Education for Sustainable Development: Beyond Traditional STEM Education (pp. 3–19). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004524705_001

Tucker-Raymond, E., & Gravel, B. E. (2019). STEM Literacies in Makerspaces: Implications for Learning, Teaching, and Research (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351256728

Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2020). The Effect of Gamma Ray (?) Irradiation on Optical Absorption of Polymer Film Blend. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v8i2.3215

Verawati, N. N. S. P., Ernita, N., & Prayogi, S. (2022). Enhancing the Reasoning Performance of STEM Students in Modern Physics Courses Using Virtual Simulation in the LMS Platform. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(13), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i13.31459

Verawati, N. N. S. P., Harjono, A., Wahyudi, W., & Gummah, S. (2022). Inquiry-Creative Learning Integrated with Ethnoscience: Efforts to Encourage Prospective Science Teachers’ Critical Thinking in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), Article 9. https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/5890

Verawati, N. N. S. P., Hikmawati, H., & Prayogi, S. (2020). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Models Intervened by Reflective Processes to Promote Critical Thinking Ability in Terms of Cognitive Style. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14687

Verawati, N. N. S. P., Hikmawati, H., Prayogi, S., & Bilad, M. R. (2021). Reflective Practices in Inquiry Learning: Its Effectiveness in Training Pre-Service Teachers’ Critical Thinking Viewed from Cognitive Styles. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.31814

Wahyudi, P Verawati, N. N. S., Ayub, S., & Prayogi, S. (2018). Development of Inquiry-Creative-Process Learning Model to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Physics Prospective Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012005

Wahyudi, W., Verawati, N. N. S. P., Ayub, S., & Prayogi, S. (2019). The Effect of Scientific Creativity in Inquiry Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Prospective Teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(14), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i14.9532