Analisis Kategori Lingkungan Belajar Siswa Tingkat SMA Berdasarkan Analisis Rasch Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jar.v3i2.1768Keywords:
Lingkungan belajar, Model Rasch, Ministep, Validitas, Reliabilitas, Instrumen PenelitianAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi kualitas lingkungan belajar di Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 1 Banjarmasin menggunakan Model Rasch. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah angket dengan 25 butir soal yang mengukur variabel-variabel lingkungan belajar seperti interaksi sosial dan akses ke sumber belajar. Data dikumpulkan dari 54 siswa kelas X dan XI dan dianalisis menggunakan software Ministep versi 5.3.1.0. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar siswa memiliki lingkungan belajar yang baik (46,3%) dan cukup (50%), dengan hanya 3,7% yang memiliki lingkungan belajar yang kurang. Analisis juga mengidentifikasi 9 siswa sebagai outlier, menunjukkan ketidakkonsistenan dalam jawaban angket. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi lingkungan belajar termasuk keaktifan guru, kondisi fisik ruang kelas, serta ketersediaan alat tulis dan buku pelajaran. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya lingkungan belajar yang kondusif untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa. Model Rasch dan software Ministep terbukti efektif dalam memastikan validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian, memberikan data yang akurat dan konsisten untuk analisis lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi praktis untuk meningkatkan lingkungan belajar di sekolah-sekolah di Indonesia.
Analysis of the Learning Environment Categories for High School Students Based on the Rasch Model
Abstract
This study aims to assess the quality of the learning environment at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 1 Banjarmasin utilizing the Rasch Model. The research instrument comprised a questionnaire with 25 items measuring variables related to the learning environment such as social interaction and access to learning resources. Data were collected from 54 students in grades X and XI and analyzed using Ministep software version 5.3.1.0. The results indicated that the majority of students experienced a positive learning environment (46.3%) and adequate (50%), with only 3.7% experiencing a less favorable learning environment. The analysis also identified 9 students as outliers, indicating inconsistencies in questionnaire responses. Factors affecting the learning environment included teacher engagement, the physical conditions of the classrooms, and the availability of stationery and textbooks. These findings underline the importance of a conducive learning environment to enhance student motivation and learning outcomes. The Rasch Model and Ministep software were effective in ensuring the validity and reliability of the research instrument, providing accurate and consistent data for further analysis. The study offers practical recommendations for enhancing the learning environment in schools across Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Al Hakim, R., Mustika, I., & Yuliani, W. (2021). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Angket Motivasi Berprestasi. FOKUS (Kajian Bimbingan & Konseling Dalam Pendidikan), 4(4), 263. https://doi.org/10.22460/fokus.v4i4.7249
Al-Kansa, B. B., Agustini, S., & Pertiwi, P. I. (2023). Pengaruh Penataan Tempat Duduk Terhadap Keefektifan Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i1.10860
Amelia, D., & Rusman, R. (2022). Sintesis Indikator Lingkungan Belajar Konstruktivis sebagai Instrumen Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam. EDUKATIF?: JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3203
Ardiyanti, D. (2017). Aplikasi Model Rasch pada Pengembangan Skala Efikasi Diri dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Karir Siswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 248. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.17801
Aristyani, N. S. (2015). Pengaruh Kondisi Siswa dan Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI Kompetensi Keahlian Administrasi Perkantoran di SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Tempel [Skripsi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta]. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/25552/
Aryadoust, V., Tan, H. A. H., & Ng, L. Y. (2019). A Scientometric Review of Rasch Measurement: The Rise and Progress of a Specialty. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02197
Aziz, R. (2015). Aplikasi Model RASCH dalam Pengujian Alat Ukur Kesehatan Mental di Tempat Kerja. Psikoislamika?: Jurnal Psikologi dan Psikologi Islam, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.18860/psi.v12i2.6402
Azizah, A., & Wahyuningsih, S. (2020). Penggunaan Model Rasch Untuk Analisis Instrumen Tes Pada Mata Kuliah Matematika Aktuaria. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30598/jupitekvol3iss1pp45-50
Bennett, R. J., Larsson, J., Gotowiec, S., & Ferguson, M. (2024). Refinement and Validation of the Empowerment Audiology Questionnaire: Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Evaluation. Ear and Hearing, 45(3), 583. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001449
Cahyani, A., Listiana, I. D., & Larasati, S. P. D. (2020). Motivasi Belajar Siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. IQ (Ilmu Al-Qur’an): Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(01), Article 01. https://doi.org/10.37542/iq.v3i01.57
Che Lah, N. H., Tasir, Z., & Jumaat, N. F. (2022). An Evaluation of the Online Social Learning Environment Instrument (OSLEI) Using Rasch Model Analysis. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221104083. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221104083
Cho, S.-K., Kim, H., Song, Y.-J., Nam, E., Jones, B., Ndosi, M., & Sung, Y.-K. (2022). Validation of the Korean Leeds satisfaction questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis with Rasch models. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases, 25(11), 1270–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14419
Cordier, R., Milbourn, B., Martin, R., Buchanan, A., Chung, D., & Speyer, R. (2017). A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion. PLOS ONE, 12(6), e0179109. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179109
Damanik, B. E. (2019). Pengaruh Fasilitas Dan Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Motivasi Belajar. Publikasi Pendidikan, 9(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.26858/publikan.v9i1.7739
Faizah, S. N. (2017). Hakikat Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. At-Thullab?: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v1i2.85
Hamdu, G., Fuadi, F. N., Yulianto, A., & Akhirani, Y. S. (2020). Items Quality Analysis Using Rasch Model To Measure Elementary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skill On Stem Learning. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.20884
Jayaram, M., Wang, C., Wang, L., & Chung, K. C. (2021). Validating the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using Rasch analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(7), e0254984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254984
Lange, J., Dalege, J., Borsboom, D., van Kleef, G. A., & Fischer, A. H. (2020). Toward an Integrative Psychometric Model of Emotions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 444–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895057
Lim, C.-T. D., & Fraser, B. J. (2018). Learning environments research in English classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 21(3), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9260-6
Lohgheswary, N., Diana, A. S. F. N., Preethy, A., & Lun, A. W. (2022). Analysis on numerical analysis final exam questions. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6(S2), Article S2. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS2.5076
Mohamed, N., Sulaiman, W. S. W., Halim, F. wati, & Masodi, M. S. (2021). An Initial Analysis of Reliability and Validity of a Personality Instrument Using the Rasch Measurement Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9), 1735–1755.
Muliani, M., Novita, N., Mellyzar, M., Pasaribu, A. I., & Fadli, Mhd. R. (2022). Analysis of the Characteristics of the Ethnoscience-Based Numeracy Test Instrument Using the Rasch Model. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(5), 2176–2183. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i5.2285
Neldawati, N. (2020). Deskripsi Lingkungan Belajar Siswa Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fisika di SMA Ferdy Ferry Putra Kota Jambi. Journal Evaluation in Education (JEE), 1(1), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v1i1.12
Noviati, R., Misdar, M., & Adib, H. S. (2019). Pengaruh Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Tingkat Konsentrasi Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Akidah Akhlak Di Man 2 Palembang. Jurnal PAI Raden Fatah, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.19109/pairf.v1i1.3010
Pane, A., & Dasopang, M. D. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945
Parvizi, M. M., Amini, M., Dehghani, M., Jafari, P., & Parvizi, Z. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Ambulatory Care Learning Educational Environment Measure (ACLEEM) questionnaire, Shiraz, Iran. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, Volume 7, 559–566. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S112861
Rahayu, W., Putra, M. D. K., Rahmawati, Y., Hayat, B., & Koul, R. B. (2021). Validating an Indonesian Version of the What Is Happening in this Class? (WIHIC) Questionnaire Using a Multidimensional Rasch Model. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14252a
Ramdhani, R., Sayekti, S. P., Rohman, D., & Fahma, M. B. (2023). Implementasi Reward dan Punishment dalam Menciptakan Lingkungan Kondusif Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Siroh di SDIT Al-Hikmah Depok. Tarbiatuna: Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.47467/tarbiatuna.v3i1.2812
Roffiq, A., Qiram, I., & Rubiono, G. (2017). Media Musik dan Lagu pada Proses Pembelajaran. JPDI (Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia), 2(2), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpdi.v2i2.330
Saari, T., Koivisto, A., Hintsa, T., Hänninen, T., & Hallikainen, I. (2022). Psychometric Properties of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory: A Review. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 86(4), 1485–1499. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200739
Sari, H. V., & Suswanto, H. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Webuntuk Mengukur Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Komputer Jaringan Dasar Program Keahlian Teknik Komputer Dan Jaringan. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i7.9734
Sari, N., Sunarno, W., & Sarwanto, S. (2018). Analisis motivasi belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran fisika sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 3(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v3i1.591
Sovey, S., Osman, K., & Mohd Matore, M. E. E. (2022). Rasch Analysis for Disposition Levels of Computational Thinking Instrument Among Secondary School Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), em2088. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11794
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (edisi revisi). Trim Komunikata.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2015). Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Trim Komunikata.
Winser, S. J., Smith, C. M., Hale, L. A., Claydon, L. S., Whitney, S. L., & Mehta, P. (2015). COSMIN for quality rating systematic reviews on psychometric properties. Physical Therapy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743288X15Y.0000000003
Wulandari, V., Astuti, I., & Afandi. (2022). Analisis Kualitas Lingkungan Belajar Berdasarkan Persepsi Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Biotek, 10(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v10i2.32454
Zhang, L. (2019). Development of Universal Design for Learning–Aligned Environment Assessment Inventory (UDL-EAI): A Conceptual Framework and Its Application. Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting. 2019 AERA Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.3102/1433730
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Bakharzi Hakam, Saiyidah Mahtari, Mustika Wati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Authentic Research agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Journal of Authentic Research, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
