Pengembangan Modul Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Pendidikan Jasmani Luar Ruangan Berbasis Pedagogi Deep Learning di Sekolah Alam Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/dpe.v5i2.6680Keywords:
ADDIE, literasi risiko, pedagogi deep learning, pendidikan jasmani luar ruangan, pendidikan keselamatanAbstract
Pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani (PJOK) luar ruangan menghadapkan siswa pada risiko lingkungan yang dinamis, sementara pengajaran keselamatan masih cenderung menekankan kepatuhan terhadap aturan daripada kemampuan menilai dan mengelola risiko secara aktif. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan, memvalidasi, dan memperoleh bukti awal efektivitas modul kesehatan dan keselamatan berbasis Pedagogi Deep Learning (DLP) untuk PJOK luar ruangan. Penelitian menggunakan desain Research and Development dengan kerangka ADDIE dan evaluasi one-group pretest-posttest pada 30 siswa Kelas VIII/Fase D di satu sekolah alam di Surakarta, Indonesia. Validasi melibatkan enam ahli, sedangkan kepraktisan dinilai oleh satu praktisi PJOK senior. Modul mengintegrasikan scenario-based task cards, dynamic risk assessment, collaborative problem solving, dan metacognitive debriefing. Validasi menghasilkan Content Validity Index 0,92, Aiken’s V 0,89, dan kelayakan operasional 91,5%. Setelah empat sesi, skor meningkat dari 58,40 ± 8,25 menjadi 86,70 ± 6,15, t(29) = 16,42, p < 0,001, dengan . Observasi guru menunjukkan peningkatan identifikasi bahaya dan pengambilan keputusan situasional siswa.
References
Becker, C., Lauterbach, G., Spengler, S., Dettweiler, U., & Mess, F. (2017). Effects of regular classes in outdoor education settings: A systematic review on students’ learning, social and health dimensions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050485
Bierer, S. B., Beck Dallaghan, G., Borges, N. J., Brondfield, S., Fung, C. C., Huggett, K. N., Teal, C. R., Thammasitboon, S., & Colbert, C. Y. (2025). Moving beyond simplistic research design in health professions education: What a one-group pretest-posttest design will not prove. MedEdPORTAL, 21, 11527. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11527
Boke, H., Aygun, Y., Tufekci, S., Yagin, F. H., Canpolat, B., Norman, G., Prieto-González, P., & Ardigò, L. P. (2025). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ learning outcomes in physical education: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1508808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508808
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
British Educational Research Association. (2024). Ethical guidelines for educational research (5th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-fifth-edition-2024-online
Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56(3), 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/research-design/book255675
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/educational-research-planning-conducting-and-evaluating-quantitative-and-qualitative-research/P200000000920
Fang, B.-B., Lu, F. J. H., Gill, D. L., Liu, S. H., Chyi, T., & Chen, B. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of outdoor education programs on adolescents’ self-efficacy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(5), 1932–1958. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211022709
Fleur, D. S., Bredeweg, B., & van den Bos, W. (2021). Metacognition: Ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences. npj Science of Learning, 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin. https://www.corwin.com/books/deep-learning-255374
Goulet-Pelletier, J.-C., & Cousineau, D. (2018). A review of effect sizes and their confidence intervals, Part I: The Cohen’s d family. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 14(4), 242–265. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.14.4.p242
Guo, L. (2022). Using metacognitive prompts to enhance self-regulated learning and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies in computer-based learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(3), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12650
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia. (2025). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia Nomor 126/P/2025 tentang pedoman implementasi pembelajaran mendalam pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah. https://bpmpbabel.kemendikdasmen.go.id/PPID/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Salinan-Kepmendikdasmen-Nomor-126_P_2025-CAP.pdf
Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305
Mann, J., Gray, T., Truong, S., Brymer, E., Passy, R., Ho, S., Sahlberg, P., Ward, K., Bentsen, P., Curry, C., & Cowper, R. (2022). Getting out of the classroom and into nature: A systematic review of nature-specific outdoor learning on school children’s learning and development. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 877058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.877058
McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
Mygind, L., Kjeldsted, E., Hartmeyer, R., Mygind, E., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2019). Mental, physical and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment of the evidence. Health & Place, 58, 102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.05.014
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Porsanger, L. (2023). Risk and safety management in physical education: Teachers’ knowledge. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 28(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1934663
Porsanger, L., & Magnussen, L. I. (2021). Risk and safety management in physical education: A study of teachers’ practice perspectives. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3, 663676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2021.663676
Porsanger, L., & Sandseter, E. B. H. (2021). Risk and safety management in physical education: Teachers’ perceptions. Education Sciences, 11(7), 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070321
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Trabelsi, O., Gharbi, A., Souissi, M. A., Mezghanni, N., Bouchiba, M., & Mrayeh, M. (2022). Video modeling examples are effective tools for self-regulated learning in physical education: Students learn through repeated viewing, self-talk, and mental rehearsal. European Physical Education Review, 28(2), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211046300
Trust, T., & Pektas, E. (2018). Using the ADDIE model and Universal Design for Learning principles to develop an open online course for teacher professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1494521
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2021). UNICEF procedure on ethical standards in research, evaluation, data collection and analysis. https://www.unicef.org/evaluation/documents/unicef-procedure-ethical-standards-research-evaluation-data-collection-and-analysis
Yuliarto, H. (2021). Analisis indeks Aiken untuk mengukur validitas isi instrumen komitmen tugas bermain sepakbola. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 17(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpji.v17i1.38777
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Annisa Asy Syahidah, Rezha Arzhan Hidayat

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

