Abstract
Little research attention has been given to investigating inequalities in access to social rights for older women and men in rural Indonesia. This paper aims to analyse the extent of access of older adults to the elements of the social welfare program, the determinants of exclusion from these programs and how existing programs can be improved. Data is drawn from the Ageing in Rural Indonesian Study (ARIS). The Indonesian government has made efforts to fulfil the social rights of older adults. However, logistic regression analysis indicates significant variation and inequalities in access to government services among rural older adults depending on sex, region and social class. The extent of access is influenced by the state’s approach and certain cultural assumptions in the local communities. The state influence works through the way programs are organized and provided. This paper also highlights the challenges that affect the quality of services for older adults, including very limited coverage, underfunding, poor targeting, decentralization and lack of integration, and poorly prepared health care workers.
References
Adioetomo, S. M., Howell, F., McPherson, A., & Priebe, J. (2013). Social Assistance for the Elderly in Indonesia: An Empirical Assessment of the Asistensi Sosial Lanjut UsiaTerlantar Programme. Jakarta: Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan (TNP2K).
Adioetomo, S. M., & Pardede, E. L. (2022). Older Persons in Indonesia: Sources of Income and Social Protection. In Handbook of Aging, Health and Public Policy: Perspectives from Asia (pp. 1-16): Springer.
Ananta, A., Arifin, E. N., & Bakhtiar. (2005). Ethnicity and ageing in Indonesia, 2000–2050. Asian Population Studies, 1(2), 227-243.
Bank, W. (2003). World Development Report 2004: Making services work for poor people: The World Bank.
Barrientos, A., & Hulme, D. (2008). Social protection for the poor and poorest: An introduction. In Social protection for the poor and poorest (pp. 3-24): Springer.
Beresford, P. (2005). Redistributing profit and loss: the new economics of the market and social welfare. Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 464-482.
Binelli, C., Loveless, M., & Whitefield, S. (2012). 'What is Social Inequality and Why Does it Matter?'. Paper presented at the APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper.
BPS. (2019). Statistik Penduduk Lanjut Usia 2019. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Cao, J., & Rammohan, A. (2016). Social capital and healthy ageing in Indonesia. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 631.
Devarajan, S., & Reinikka, R. (2004). Making services work for poor people. Journal of African economies, 13(suppl_1), i142-i166.
Gough, I., Bradshaw, J., Ditch, J., Eardley, T., & Whiteford, P. (1997). Social assistance in OECD countries. Journal of European social policy, 7(1), 17-43.
Hall, B., & Scragg, T. (2012). Social work with older people: Approaches to person-centred practice: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Hermalin, A. I., Ofstedal, M. B., & Mehta, K. (2002). The vulnerable and their potential disadvantages. The well-being of the elderly in Asia: A four country comparative study, 461-518.
Ihromi, T. O. (1994). Inheritance and equal rights for Toba Batak daughters. Law and Society Review, 525-537.
Kadar, K. S., Francis, K., & Sellick, K. (2013). Ageing in Indonesia–health status and challenges for the future. Ageing International, 38(4), 261-270.
Kandal, T. R. (1988). The woman question in classical sociological theory.
Kudrna, G., Le, T., & Piggott, J. (2022). Macro-demographics and ageing in emerging Asia: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Population Ageing, 15(1), 7-38.
McCarthy, J., & Sumarto, M. (2018). Social Protection Program in Indonesia: Understanding the Politics of Distribution. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 35(2), 223.
Muis, I., Andi Agustang, A. A., & Adam, A. (2020). Elderly poverty: social demographic, work distribution, problem health & social protection. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (AJSSH), 9(1), 40-48.
O'rand, A. (2018). Age and inequality: Diverse pathways through later life: Routledge.
OECD. (2019). Social Protection System Review of Indonesia. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Priebe, J., & Howell, F. (2014). Old-age poverty in Indonesia: Empirical evidence and policy options. Retrieved from
Rosser, A., & Edwin, D. (2010). The politics of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 23(1), 1-22.
Schmitt, V., & Chadwick, R. (2014). Social protection assessment?based national dialogue exercises: C ambodia, I ndonesia, T hailand, V iet N am. International Social Security Review, 67(1), 95-119.
Schröder-Butterfill, E., & Marianti, R. (2006). A framework for understanding old-age vulnerabilities. Ageing & Society, 26(1), 9-35.
Sumarto, S., & Suryahadi, A. (2001). Principles and approaches to targeting with reference to the Indonesian social safety net. ASEAN-Australia Social Safety Net Project in Jakarta, Indonesia, May, 22-23.
Suryahadi, A., Yumna, A., Raya, U. R., & Marbun, D. (2010). Review of Government's Poverty Reduction Strategies, Policies and Programs in Indonesia: SMERU Research Institute Jakarta.
Thristiawati, S. (2013). Socio-cultural dimension of gendered wellbeing of older persons in Lampung, Indonesia. (Dissertation Dissertation). The Australian National University, Canberra.
TNP2K. (2018). The Future of The Social Protection System in Indonesia: Social Protection for All. In: TNP2K Jakarta.
Utomo, A., Mcdonald, P., Utomo, I., Cahyadi, N., & Sparrow, R. (2019). Social engagement and the elderly in rural Indonesia. Social Science & Medicine, 229, 22-31.
Van Minh, H., Ng, N., Byass, P., & Wall, S. (2012). Patterns of subjective quality of life among older adults in rural Vietnam and Indonesia. Geriatrics & gerontology international, 12(3), 397-404.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Muh Ulil Absor