Pengaruh Metode Concept Map Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di MA NW Kotaraja

Authors

  • Indri Febriani Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
  • Irham Azmi Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika
  • Syarifuddin Syarifuddin Universitas Halu Oleo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/jar.v2i2.2140

Keywords:

Concept map, hasil belajar, pembelajaran fisika, suhu dan kalor

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh metode concept map terhadap hasil belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran fisika di MA NW Kotaraja. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain eksperimen dengan dua kelompok, yaitu kelompok eksperimen yang diberikan pembelajaran menggunakan metode concept map dan kelompok kontrol yang diberikan pembelajaran dengan metode konvensional. Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 56 siswa kelas X yang dibagi menjadi dua kelompok: 31 siswa di kelompok eksperimen dan 25 siswa di kelompok kontrol. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata nilai post-test siswa di kelompok eksperimen adalah 75 dengan standar deviasi 10, sementara di kelompok kontrol rata-rata nilainya adalah 57 dengan standar deviasi 9. Uji hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa thitung sebesar 7,148 lebih besar dari ttabel sebesar 1,671 pada taraf signifikansi 95%, yang berarti terdapat perbedaan signifikan antara kedua kelompok. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa metode concept map secara signifikan meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa dibandingkan dengan metode konvensional. Rekomendasi untuk penelitian lanjutan termasuk penggunaan peta konsep dalam mata pelajaran lain dan integrasi teknologi dalam pembelajaran.

The Influence of Concept Map Method on Student Learning Outcomes at MA NW Kotaraja

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of the concept map method on student learning outcomes in physics at MA NW Kotaraja. The research employed an experimental design with two groups: an experimental group that received instruction using the concept map method and a control group that received conventional teaching methods. The sample consisted of 56 tenth-grade students, divided into two groups: 31 students in the experimental group and 25 in the control group. The results showed that the average post-test score for students in the experimental group was 75 with a standard deviation of 10, while the control group averaged 57 with a standard deviation of 9. Hypothesis testing revealed that the t-value of 7.148 exceeded the critical value of 1.671 at a 95% confidence level, indicating a significant difference between the two groups. These findings suggest that the concept map method significantly enhances student learning outcomes compared to conventional methods. Recommendations for future research include the application of concept maps in other subjects and the integration of technology in teaching.

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (edisi 2). Bumi Aksara. https://ecampus-fip.umj.ac.id/pustaka_umj/main/item/14939

Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Liang, Y.-R. (2014). A cooperative computerized concept-mapping approach to improving students’ learning performance in web-based information-seeking activities. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0001-2

Eshuis, E. H., ter Vrugte, J., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2022). Expert examples and prompted reflection in learning with self-generated concept maps. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12615

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.

Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). Using Concept Maps to Facilitate Collaborative Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 340–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.748664

Hafeez, M. (2021). Assessment of academic achievements and memorisation power of students by concept map strategy and traditional lecture approach. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 13(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v13i3.5922

Kusumadewi, R. F., & Kusmaryono, I. (2022). Concept maps as dynamic tools to increase students’ understanding of knowledge and creative thinking. Premiere Educandum?: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v12i1.11745

Putri, R. A., Gusnedi, G., Desnita, D., & Dewi, W. S. (2023). EFFECT OF THE PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODEL WITH CONCEPT MAP ON PHYSICS STUDENTS ACHIEVEMENT. Physics Learning and Education, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24036/ple.v1i1.13

Ramdiah, S., & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning Strategy Equalizing Students’ Achievement, Metacognitive, and Critical Thinking Skills. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-8-3

Rugh, M. S., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2023). Improving Self-Efficacy With Automatically Generated Interactive Concept Maps: DIME Maps. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 21(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.21.3.2765

Wong, R. M., Alpizar, D., Adesope, O. O., & Nishida, K. R. A. (2024). Role of concept map format and student interest on introductory electrochemistry learning. School Science and Mathematics, 124(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12599

Downloads

Published

2023-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Febriani, I., Azmi, I., & Syarifuddin, S. (2023). Pengaruh Metode Concept Map Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di MA NW Kotaraja. Journal of Authentic Research, 2(2), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.36312/jar.v2i2.2140