Pelatihan Penulisan Proposal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas bagi Guru guru Bahasa Inggris SMP se MGMP Kabupaten Mojokerto
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/sasambo.v3i3.514Keywords:
PTK, MGMP, Guru Bahasa Inggris, Kompetensi.Abstract
Tujuan Program Pengabdian Masyarakat adalah memberikan pelatihan kepada guru guru Bahasa Inggris se MGMP Kabupaten Mojokerto tentang sistematika penulisan proposal penelitian Tindakan kelas (PTK). Pelatihan ini diikuti oleh 35 peserta dari guru guru Bahasa Inggris SMP se MGMP Kabupaten Mojokerto. Metode pelaksanaan pelatihan ini adalah dengan pendampingan dan ceramah tentang konsep PTK yang dilakukan dengan daring menggunakan zoom, whatsapp, dan email. Berdasarkan hasil pendampingan, terdapat 6 proposal yang sudah di beri catatan dari Tim pelaksana untuk direvisi dan dikembalikan dalam waktu 1 minggu setelah pelaksanaan kegiatan. 29 peserta yang belum melakukan pendampingan proposalnya beri kesempatan untuk konsultasi melalui whatsapp atau email. Hasil peserta dapat mengidentifikasi kesalahan yang dibuat oleh peserta dalam proposal para peserta dan memberikan pembetulan terhadap kesalahan tersebut, misalnya kesalahan pada judul yang tidak mencerminkan karakteristik PTK, pendahuluan yang tidak focus pada masalah dalam kelas, dan metode penelitian yang tidak ditulis dan dijabarkan secara sistematis dan adanya kesalahan konsep tentang data dan sumber data, dan prosedur pengumpulan data.
Classroom Action Research Proposal Writing Training for Middle School English teachers in Mojokerto Regency MGMP
The objective of the Community Service Program is to provide training to English teachers throughout Mojokerto Regency MGMP on the systematics of writing classroom action research proposals (CAR). This training was attended by 35 participants from junior high school English teachers throughout Mojokerto Regency MGMP. The method of implementing this training is with mentoring and lectures on the concept of CAR which are carried out online using zoom, WhatsApp, and email. Based on the results of the assistance, there are 6 proposals that have been noted from the implementation team to be revised and returned within 1 week after the implementation of the activity. 29 participants who have not assisted their proposals, give them the opportunity to consult via WhatsApp or email. Results participants can identify errors made by participants in the participants' proposals and provide corrections for these errors, for example, errors in titles that do not reflect the characteristics of CAR, introductions that do not focus on problems in class, and research methods that are not written and described systematically and there are misconceptions about data and data sources, and data collection procedures.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, Suhardjono, dan Supardi. (2021). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Alex. (2016). Classroom Action Research Dalam Pendidikan Bahasa: Teori, Design, dan Praktek. Tangerang Selatan: UIN Jakarta Press.
Birokrasi, M. N. P. A. N. dan R. (2010). Jabatan Fungsional Pengawas Sekolah dan Fungsi Angka Kreditnya. Mentri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi.
Hamied, F. A. (2009). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif di Era Global (Suatu Kajian Perbandingan di Negara Maju. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(2), 95–110.
Hia, Y. D, Sumarni, dan A. (2016). Pelatihan Metode Pembelajaran Inovatif Untuk Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru SMA. Jurnal Pelangi, 8(2), 243–249.
Hurmaini, M. (2011). Dampak pelaksanaan sertifikasi guru terhadap peningkatan kinerja guru dalam proses pembelajaran: Studi pada Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri Kota Jambi. Media Akademika, 26(4), 501–535.
Kependidikan, D. D. D. D. T. (2001). Pedoman Penyusunan Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan dan Angka Kredit Pengembangan Profesi Guru.
Kunandar. (2011). Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. PtT. Rajawali Press.
Mettetal, G. (2012). The What, Why and How of Classroom Action Research. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 6–13. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1589
Mulyasa, E. (2013). Praktik penelitian Tindakan Kelas menciptakan Perbaikan Berkesinambungan. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Stringer, E. (2008). Action Research in Education (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Salim, Karo Karo, dan Haidir. (2016). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (Teori dan Aplikasi Bagi Mahasiswa, Guru Mata Pelajaran Umum dan Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah). Medan: Perdana Publishing.
Widyaningrum, H.K and Rahmanumeta, F, M. (2016). Pentingnya Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Menghadapi Kreativitas Siswa Di Masa Depan. Proceedings International Seminar FoE (Faculty of Education), 268–277.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Ribut Surjowati, Bekti Wirawati, Heru Wibowo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Sasambo: Jurnal Abdimas (Journal of Community Service) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
