Studi Akuntabilitas Yayasan di Nusa Tenggara Barat

Authors

  • M. Ali Fikri Universitas Mataram
  • Sapto Hendri BS Universitas Mataram
  • Siti Atikah Universitas Mataram
  • Elin Erlina Sasanti Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v4i1.1288

Keywords:

Akuntabilitas, Organisasi, Keuangan.

Abstract

Organisasi tidak dapat dipisahkan dari keberadaan individu dan kelompok di sekitarnya seperti konsumen, kreditur, dan pemerintah. Semua pihak baik secara langsung atau tidak langsung menentukan kelangsungan hidup organisasi, termasuk organisasi sosial seperti yayasan. Permasalahan yang sering dijumpai dilapangan terkait kritik akuntabilitas yayasan yang sering kali kurang, terutama dalam hal akuntabilitas keuangan. Metode yang digunakan yakni berupa analisis survey penelusuran dokumen secara online yang terdapat di Nusa Tenggara Barat. Ditemukan bahwa yayasan cenderung menyajikan akuntabilitas mengenai kegiatan yang akan dan telah mereka lakukan serta lingkup organisasi secara umum. Sebanyak 375 NGO yang terdaftar sejak tahun 2014 sampai 2020 sedangkan pada tahun 2022 terdapat sejumlah 362 yayasan yang memperoleh bantuan namun tidak menyajikan akuntabilitas keuangan organisasi secara terbuka ke publik.

Foundation Accountability Study in West Nusa Tenggara

Abstract

Organizations cannot be separated from the existence of individuals and groups around them such as consumers, creditors and the government. All parties either directly or indirectly determine the survival of the organization, including social organizations such as foundations. The problems that are often encountered in the field are related to criticism of foundation accountability which is often lacking, especially in terms of financial accountability. The method used is in the form of an online document search survey analysis in West Nusa Tenggara. It was found that foundations tend to present accountability regarding the activities they will and have undertaken and the scope of the organization in general. A total of 375 NGOs have been registered from 2014 to 2020, while in 2022 there were a total of 362 foundations that received assistance but did not present their organizational financial accountability openly to the public.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atack, I. (1999). Four Kriteria of Devellopement NGO Legitimacy. World Developement, Vol. 27, pp. 855-864.

Brown, L. D. & Mark, H. M. (2001) Accountability, Strategy, and International Non Governmental Organization. Working Paper, Harvard University.

Creswell, J. & Guetterman, T. (2018). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 6th Edition. New York: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed Edisi Keempat. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dixon., Rob., John, R., & Juliana, S. (2006) Microfinance: Accountability From the Grassroots. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal. Vol.19, No.3. pp.405-427.

Ebrahim, A. (2003), Accountability In Practice: Mechanism for NGOs, World Development, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 813-29.

Fries, R. (2003), “The legal environmental of civil society”, in Kaldor, M., Anheier, H. and Glasius,M. (Eds), Global Civil Society 2003, Oxford

Gibelman, M., & Sheldon, R. G. (2001). Very Public Scandals: Nongovernmental Organizations in Trouble. Internasional Jurnal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 12(1), 49– 66.

Goddard, A. & Mussa, J. A. (2006). Accounting and Navigating Legitimacy in Tanzanian NGO. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 377-404.

Gray., Rob., Jan, B., & David, C. (2006) NGOs, Civil Society and Accountability: Making the People Accountable to Capital. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal. Vol. 19, No.3I. pp. 319-348.

Jensen., Michael, C. & William, H. M. (1976), Teory of the Firm: Manajerial Behaviour, Agency Cost and Owenership Structure. Jurnal of Financial Economics. October, 1976, V.3 No.4, pp.305-360.

Kaldor, M. (2003). Civil Society and Accountability. Journal of Human Development. Vol. 4 No. 1.

Kovach, H., Caroline, N., & Simon, B. (2003), Power Without Accountability? The Global Accountability Report 1, One World Trust, London, pdf download available at: www.oneworldtrust.org/htmlGAP/report.

Lehman, G. (1999). Disclosing New Worlds: A Role for Social and Environmental Accounting and Auditing. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 217-42.

Lehman, G. (2005). A Critical Perspective on the Harmonisation of Accounting In A Globalising World, Critical Perspectives on Accounting. Vol. 16, pp. 975-92.

Yamin, M. (2022). LSM di Tengah Tuntutan Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi. https://boyanesia.republika.co.id/posts/145990/lsm-di-tengah-tuntutan-akuntabilitas-dan-transparansi.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-29

How to Cite

Fikri, M. A., BS, S. H., Atikah, S., & Sasanti, E. E. (2023). Studi Akuntabilitas Yayasan di Nusa Tenggara Barat. Empiricism Journal, 4(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v4i1.1288

Issue

Section

Articles