Analisis Kritis Karakter Profil Pelajar Pancasila Ditinjau dari Perspektif Filsafat Pendidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v4i2.1664Keywords:
Profil Pelajar Pancasila, Filsafat Pendidikan, Karakter.Abstract
Pancasila adalah dasar dan ideologi bangsa Indonesia yang mempunyai fungsi dalam kehidupan bangsa dan negara Indonesia. Di Indonesia, karakter yang dibelajarkan pada peserta didik mengacu pada nilai nilai Pancasila yang dituangkan dalam Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Filsafat pendidikan adalah pemikiran yang mendalam tentang pendidikan berdasarkan filsafat. Apabila di hubungkan profil pelajar pancasila dengan filsafat pendidikan maka hal ini dapat mengembangkan pengetahuan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menelaah literatur yang membahas karakter profil pelajar pancasila, dan mendeskripsikan pandangan-pandangan filsafat pendidikan terhadap karaktek profil pelajar pancasila karakter pelajar. Peninjauaan ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan aliran filsafat Pendidikan parenialisme dan esensialisme. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur dengan cara pengumpulan Informasi yang didapatkan dari berbagai buku, jurnal dan literatur lainnya. Dari informasi yang didapatkan bahwa Keterkaitan antara filsafat pendidikan dan karakteristik profil pelajar Pancasila menyoroti bahwa berbagai aliran filsafat pendidikan dapat memberikan pandangan yang berbeda-beda dalam memberikan pandangan terhadap masing masing dari ke enam karakter profil pelajar pancasila. Namun demikian, Integrasi elemen-elemen dari berbagai aliran tersebut dapat memberikan pendekatan pendidikan yang seimbang dan holistik, membantu menciptakan generasi muda yang beriman, bertakwa, berakhlak mulia, gotong royong, kreatif, nalar kritis, kebinekaan global, dan mandiri sesuai dengan cita-cita bangsa.
Critical Analysis of the Character of Pancasila Profile Viewed from the Perspective of Educational Philosophy
Abstract
Pancasila is the foundation and ideology of the Indonesian nation, serving a crucial role in the life of the Indonesian people and the state. In Indonesia, the principles taught to learners are based on the values of Pancasila as outlined in the Pancasila Student Profile. Educational philosophy involves profound reflections on education based on philosophical principles. When we connect the Pancasila Student Profile with educational philosophy, it can contribute to knowledge development. The aim of this research is to examine literature discussing the characteristics of the Pancasila Student Profile and to describe the views of educational philosophy on the characteristics of student profiles. This investigation is conducted using the philosophical streams of Parentalism and Essentialism in education. The method employed is a literature review, collecting information from various books, journals, and other literature sources. From the gathered information, it is evident that the connection between educational philosophy and the characteristics of the Pancasila Student Profile highlights that various educational philosophies can offer different perspectives on each of the six characteristics of the Pancasila Student Profile. Nevertheless, integrating elements from various philosophies can provide a balanced and holistic educational approach, aiding in the creation of a younger generation that is faithful, pious, morally upright, collaborative, creative, critically thinking, globally tolerant, and independent, in line with the aspirations of the nation.
Downloads
References
Aditomo, A. (2019). Disposisi berpikir terbuka secara aktif: Definisi, pengukuran, dan kaitannya dengan prestasi akademik. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v10n1.p1-14
Asah, S. T., Bengston, D. N., Westphal, L. M., & Gowan, C. H. (2018a). Environmental Citizenship Scale-Modified Version [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi. org/10.1037/t69397-000
Asah, S. T., Bengston, D. N., Westphal, L. M., & Gowan, C. H. (2018b). Mechanisms of children’s exposure to nature: Predicting adulthood environmental citizenship and commitment to nature-based activities. Environment and Behavior, 50(7), 807–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517718021
Astutik, U. P., & Khojir, K. (2023). Perenialisme dalam Pandangan Filsafat Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 3247-3256
Beck, K. L., Acevedo-Polakovich, I. D., Lyons, E., Estevez, J., Sevecke, J. R., Rossman, D. L., Barnett, M. L., & Fisher, H. R. (2018). The Youth Diversity Acceptance Scale: Development and validity. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 51(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/07
Chen, P. P., Cleary, T. J., & Lui, A. M. (2015). Examining parents’ ratings of middleschool students’ academic self-regulation using principal axis factoring analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 385–397. https://doi. org/10.1037/spq0000098
Chen, Y.-H., & Lin, Y.-J. (2018). Validation of the Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire for Taiwanese college students (TSSRQ). Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https:// doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00259
Cheng, J. C.-H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to Nature Index [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t22972-000
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 43–52.
Featherstone, M. (2020). Problematizing the global: An Introduction to global culture revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(7–8), 157–167. https://doi. org/10.1177/0263276420957715
Fernando, J. W., Burden, N., Ferguson, A., O’Brien, L. V., Judge, M., & Kashima, Y. (2018). Functions of utopia: How utopian thinking motivates societal engagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(5), 779–792. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0146167217748604
Fung, J. J. Y., Yuen, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2018). Validity evidence for a Chinese version of the Online Self-Regulated Learning Questionnaire with average students and mathematically talented students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 51(2), 111–124. https://doi. org/10.1080/07481 756.2017.1358056
Hahm, J. (Jeannie), Breiter, D., Severt, K., Wang, Y., & Fjelstul, J. (2016). The relationship between sense of community and satisfaction on future intentions to attend an association’s annual meeting. Tourism Management, 52, 151– 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.016
Hjerm, M., Eger, M. A., Bohman, A., & Fors Connolly, F. (2020). A new approach to the study of tolerance: Conceptualizing and measuring acceptance, respect, and appreciation of difference. Social Indicators Research, 147(3), 897– 919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02176-y
Hoskin, B., & Liu, L. (2019). Measuring life skills in the context of Life Skills and Citizenship Education the Middle East and North Africa. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and the World Bank
Jenilan, J. (2018). Filsafat Pendidikan. EL-AFKAR: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Tafsir Hadis, 7(1), 69-74.
Khairani, D., & Putra, E. D. (2021). Analisis implementasi lima nilai karakter pendidikan pada kegiatan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2247–2255. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.1198
Lee, T. H., Jan, F.-H., & Yang, C.-C. (2013). Environmentally Responsible Behavior Scale [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t22946-000
Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014).Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next-generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–23.
Liu, S. H. (2017). Relationship between the factors influencing online help-seeking and self-regulated learning among Taiwanese preservice teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2017.02.034
Maharani, S. T., & Muhtar, T. (2022). Implementasi pembelajaran berbasis kearifan lokal untuk meningkatkan karakter siswa. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 5961–5968. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3148
Muttaqin, D & Widhiarso, W. (2022). Dokumen Rekomendasi Kebijakan Hasil Asesmen Nasional Tahun 2021. Jakarta: Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
Nanggala, A., & Suryadi, K. (2021). Analisis konsep kampus merdeka dalam perspektif aliran Filsafat Pendidikan Progresivisme dan Perenialisme. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 14-26.
Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2020). Global culture, 1990, 2020. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(7–8), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420958447
Nursikin, M. (2016). Aliran-Aliran Filsafat Pendidikan Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam. ATTARBIYAH: Journal of Islamic Culture and Education, 1(2), 303-334.
Novariana, N. (2017). Pendidikan dan Pembentukan Karakter dengan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Kepribadian. https://journal.unbara.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/download/82/69
Purwati, P., Rizal, A. S., & Nurdin, E. S. (2020). Konsep pendidikan umum di perguruan tinggi dalam tinjauan esensialisme. Sosio Religi: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Umum, 18(2).
Rinkus, M. A., Kramer, D., & Dobson, T. (2016). Informing community engagement in sea turtle conservation by examining non-conservation-related participation in northeast Brazil. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 21(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/10871209.2016.1098752
Robertson-Kraft, C., & Austin, K. (2015). The character of achievement: An analysis of teachers’ instructional practices for character education. Journal of Character Education, 11, 109+. https:// link. g a l e . c o m / a p p s / d o c / A 4 5 9 8 0 6 1 7 5 / A O N E ? u = b r o o k l a w _ main&sid=googleScholar&xid=e7b9cded
Rosenthal, S. (2011). Measuring knowledge of indoor environmental hazards. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvp.2010.08.003
Rowe, M., Clayton, A., Benedict, P., Bellamy, C., Antunes, K., Miller, R., Pelletier, J.-F., Stern, E., & O’Connell, M. J. (2012). Citizenship Outcome Measure [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t31762-000
Sari, M., & Asmendri, A. (2020). Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. Natural Science, 6(1), 41-53.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Masjudin Masjudin, I Wayan Suastra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
