Strategi Penyembunyian dan Pengucilan Aktor Sosial dalam Berita Razia Kamar Kos: Analisis Wacana Theo Van Leeuwen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v5i2.2250Keywords:
Analisis Wacana Kritis, Eksklusi, Inklusi, Media Massa, Theo van LeeuwenAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis strategi eksklusi dan inklusi aktor sosial dalam pemberitaan media massa tentang razia kamar kos yang dilakukan oleh Tim Maung Galunggung Polres Tasikmalaya Kota. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan analisis wacana kritis Theo van Leeuwen, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pasangan yang tertangkap dan pemilik kos mengalami eksklusi melalui pasivasi, asimilasi, dan generalisasi, sedangkan polisi dan masyarakat diinklusikan melalui nominasi, determinasi, dan asosiasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa strategi ini memperkuat stigma sosial terhadap kelompok marginal, mempertegas legitimasi otoritas, dan mendorong solidaritas sosial yang terbatas. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada wacana kritis dengan menyoroti bagaimana media membentuk narasi moral yang berdampak pada dinamika sosial dan kebijakan publik.
The Strategic Role of Educational Philosophy in Human Resource Development: Theoretical Insights and Global Implementation
Abstract
This study aims to analyze strategies of exclusion and inclusion of social actors in media coverage of boarding house raids conducted by the Maung Galunggung Team of the Tasikmalaya City Police. Using Theo van Leeuwen's critical discourse analysis framework, the study reveals that arrested couples and boarding house owners were excluded through passivation, assimilation, and generalization, while the police and the community were included through nomination, determination, and association. The findings indicate that these strategies reinforce social stigma against marginalized groups, legitimize authority, and foster limited social solidarity. This study contributes to critical discourse analysis by highlighting how media narratives shape moral perceptions, social dynamics, and public policy.
Downloads
References
Barry, C. L., McGinty, E. E., Pescosolido, B. A., & Goldman, H. H. (2014). Stigma, discrimination, treatment effectiveness, and policy: public views about drug addiction and mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 65(10), 1269-1272. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201400140
Bleich, E., Bloemraad, I., & Graauw, E. d. (2015). Migrants, minorities and the media: information, representations and participation in the public sphere. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(6), 857-873. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2014.1002197
Chan, C. K. K. (2014). Gendered morality and development narratives: the case of female labor migration from indonesia. Sustainability, 6(10), 6949-6972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6106949
Eden, A., Daalmans, S., Ommen, M. v., & Weljers, A. (2017). Melfi’s choice: morally conflicted content leads to moral rumination in viewers. Journal of Media Ethics, 32(3), 142-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2017.1329019
Hahn, L., Tamborini, R., Prabhu, S., Grall, C., Novotny, E., & Klebig, B. (2022). Narrative media’s emphasis on distinct moral intuitions alters early adolescents’ judgments. Journal of Media Psychology, 34(3), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000307
Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2016). Structural stigma: research evidence and implications for psychological science.. American Psychologist, 71(8), 742-751. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000068
Hildebrandt, T. and Bode, L. (2019). Responsibilization and sexual stigma under austerity: surveying public support for government-funded prep in england. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 17(4), 643-653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00422-z
Inglis, G., McHardy, F., Sosu, E., McAteer, J., & Biggs, H. (2019). Health inequality implications from a qualitative study of experiences of poverty stigma in scotland. Social Science &Amp; Medicine, 232, 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.033
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Lee, T. K. and Shapiro, M. A. (2014). The interaction of affective dispositions, moral judgments, and intentionality in assessing narrative characters: rationalist and intuitionist sequences. Communication Theory, 24(2), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12031
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage Publications.
McGinty, E. E., Pescosolido, B. A., Kennedy-Hendricks, A., & Barry, C. L. (2018). Communication strategies to counter stigma and improve mental illness and substance use disorder policy. Psychiatric Services, 69(2), 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700076
Morgan, C. and Lewis, R. (2017). Moral ambiguity in narratives decreases creative performance in highly creative people. Journal of Creative Communications, 12(2), 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973258617708376
Nazir, U., Sulaiman, N., & Abid, S. K. (2021). Rise of digital humanitarian network (dhn) in southeast asia: social media insights for crisis mapping in disaster risk reduction (drr). International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 11(5), 573-583. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110509
Purtle, J., Lê?Scherban, F., Wang, X. I., Shattuck, P., Proctor, E. K., & Brownson, R. C. (2019). State legislators’ support for behavioral health parity laws: the influence of mutable and fixed factors at multiple levels. The Milbank Quarterly, 97(4), 1200-1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12431
Purtle, J., Nelson, K., & Gollust, S. E. (2021). Public opinion about adverse childhood experiences: social stigma, attribution of blame, and government intervention. Child Maltreatment, 27(3), 344-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595211004783
Rao, N. and Lingam, L. (2020). Smartphones, youth and moral panics: exploring print and online media narratives in india. Mobile Media &Amp; Communication, 9(1), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920922262
Rowe, E. and O’Brien, E. (2014). ‘genuine’ refugees or illegitimate ‘boat people‘: political constructions of asylum seekers and refugees in the malaysia deal debate. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 49(2), 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2014.tb00307.x
Sinpeng, A. and Koh, Y. (2023). Journalism in the age of digital autocracy: a comparative asean perspective. JAS (Journal of ASEAN Studies), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v10i2.9162
Sláma, M. and Hoesterey, J. B. (2021). Ambivalence, discontent, and divides in southeast asia's islamic digital realms: an introduction. CyberOrient, 15(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyo2.5
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ridwan Anas, Agus Hamdani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
