Menakar Demokrasi Lokal: Antara Uang dan Kekerabatan dalam Kontestasi Reje Kampung di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v6i2.2859Keywords:
Politik Uang, Politik Kekerabatan, Reje KampungAbstract
Pemilihan Reje Kampung di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah mencerminkan dinamika demokrasi lokal yang kompleks, di mana praktik politik uang dan politik kekerabatan menjadi dua elemen dominan yang saling memperkuat. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana praktik politik uang dan politik kekerabatan memengaruhi kualitas demokrasi dan tata kelola pemerintahan lokal di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah. Teori yang digunakan untuk menganalisis fenomena ini adalah teori politik uang dan politik kekerabatan. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, data dikumpulkan melalui observasi langsung dan wawancara mendalam terhadap informan sampel dari 5 Kampung di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa politik uang tidak hanya menjadi strategi elektoral utama, tetapi juga menurunkan kualitas kepemimpinan dan memperlemah akuntabilitas publik. Sementara itu, politik kekerabatan memperkuat eksklusivitas kekuasaan melalui mobilisasi jaringan sosial berbasis hubungan darah. Ketika keduanya berjalan secara simultan, pemilihan Reje Kampung cenderung menghasilkan kepemimpinan yang tidak representatif dan memperkuat oligarki lokal. Faktor ekonomi, rendahnya pendidikan politik, dan kebiasaan sosial lokal menjadi pendorong utama suburnya praktik ini. Penelitian ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya pendekatan struktural dan kultural dalam merespons tantangan demokrasi lokal serta merekomendasikan penguatan peran lembaga adat untuk memperbaiki integritas pemilihan di tingkat kampung.
Measuring Local Democracy: Between Money and Kinship in the Village Reje Contest in Central Aceh District
Abstract
The election of Reje Kampung in Central Aceh Regency reflects the complex dynamics of local democracy, where the practices of money politics and kinship politics emerge as two dominant and mutually reinforcing elements. This study aims to analyze how these practices influence the quality of democracy and local governance in Central Aceh Regency. The theoretical framework employed includes theories of money politics and kinship politics. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through direct observation and in-depth interviews with selected informants from five villages in the region. The findings reveal that money politics not only serves as the primary electoral strategy but also undermines leadership quality and weakens public accountability. Meanwhile, kinship politics reinforces the exclusivity of power through the mobilization of blood-based social networks. When both practices operate simultaneously, Reje Kampung elections tend to produce unrepresentative leadership and strengthen local oligarchies. Economic factors, low levels of political education, and prevailing local social habits are identified as the main drivers of these entrenched practices. This research highlights the importance of structural and cultural approaches in addressing the challenges of local democracy and recommends strengthening the role of traditional institutions to enhance the integrity of village-level elections.
Downloads
References
Abdurrohman, A. (2021). "Implikasi Politik Uang terhadap Integritas Pemilihan Umum di Tingkat Lokal." Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(1), 77-92
Agustino, L., Hikmawan, M. D., & Silas, J. (2020). Regional head elections, high-cost politics, and corruption in Indonesia. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(2), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.26618/ojip.v10i2.8438
Aminuddin, M. F., & Attamimi, N. H. (2018). From retail to grocery: Money politics in 2014 Indonesian legislative election. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 4(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v4i1.12609
Anjani, N. (2021). Politik Kekerabatan dalam Dinamika Pilkada di Indonesia. Jurnal Demokrasi dan Politik Lokal, 3(1), 45–56.
Aspinall, E. (2014). Money Politics in Indonesia: Patronage and Clientelism in Local Elections. NUS Press.
Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2014). Southeast Asia: Strong-state democratization and the politics of patronage. Journal of Democracy, 25(2), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2014.0046
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (Eds.). (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. NUS Press.
Berenschot, W. (2018). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Towett, J.K., & Kungu, S.K. (2020). The Implication of Political Patron-Client Linkages on Democratic Governance in Developing Democracies.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Hasan, E., Aminah, A., Hamil, H. J., & Mukhrijal, M. (2023). The practice of money politics in village head elections and its effect on the participation level of beginner voters. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 10(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.18196/gpp.v10i1.15576
Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge University Press.
Mawaddah, S., & Lubis, R. M. (2020). Pendidikan Politik Berbasis Komunitas dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Politik di Tingkat Lokal. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 24(2), 135–149.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Nurlinah, N., Darwin, R. L., & Haryanto, H. (2019). Incumbency disadvantages and populism in Indonesian local elections: Case studies of Banda Aceh and Takalar. PCD Journal, 7(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.35230
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pierskalla, J.H., & Sacks, A. (2019). Personnel Politics : Elections, Clientelistic Competition and Teacher Hiring in Indonesia. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1283-1305.
Prihatmoko, D., & Maharani, A. (2021). Politik Dinasti dan Tantangan Demokrasi Lokal di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 25(2), 141–156.
Qulsum, U. (2020). Fenomena Politik Uang dalam Pilkades: Studi Kasus di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Politik Indonesia, 12(2), 101-118.
Ramadhani, A. A. (2025). Pengaruh Politik Uang Terhadap Kualitas Demokrasi di Indonesia. Lentera Ilmu, 2(1), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.59971/li.v1i1.79.
Robison, R. & Hadiz, V. (2014). Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. Routledge.
Rusnaedy, Z., Fatma, F., & Haris, A. M. (2022). Political dynasty and single candidate in Indonesian local elections: Where are the parties?. Journal of Governance and Local Politics, 3(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.55199/jglp.v3i2.297
Simatupang, J., & Subekhan, M. (2018). The influence of money political culture in elections on the sustainability of Indonesian democracy. Law Research Review Quarterly, 4(4), 1297–1312. https://doi.org/10.15294/snh.v4i4.27028
Tapsell, R. (2022). Democracy, money and power in local Indonesian elections. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 52(1), 1–18.
Virananda, I. G. S., Dartanto, T., & Wijaya, B. D. (2021). Does money matter for electability? Lesson learned from the 2014 legislative election in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 11(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054492
Winters, J. (2014). Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia. Dalam M. Ford & T. Pepinsky (Eds.), Beyond Oligarchy: Wealth, Power and Contemporary Indonesian Politics (hlm. 11-33). Cornell University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Annisah Putri, Hazdi Syah Putra, Maghfira Faraidiany, Iqbal Ahmady, Ubaidullah Ubaidullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
