Demokrasi Industri dan Pendidikan Vokasi dalam Membangun Budaya Partisipatif dan Keadilan Sosial di Dunia Kerja

Authors

  • Ridha Kartini Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Tika Sylviani Gusti Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Agus Fadly Taqwan Lubis Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rijal Abdullah Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Hendra Hidayat Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/1rvpst35

Keywords:

Demokrasi Industri, Partisipasi Pekerja, Kompetensi Sosio-Politik

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji pengintegrasian konsep Demokrasi Industri (DI) ke dalam pendidikan vokasi Indonesia untuk mengatasi keterbatasan pendekatan link and match yang terlalu instrumental. Meskipun model link and match berhasil mencetak lulusan yang kompeten secara teknis, ia gagal membekali mereka dengan kompetensi sosio-politik (seperti kesadaran hak pekerja, negosiasi, dan pemahaman hubungan industrial), membuat lulusan rentan dan minim partisipasi dalam pengambilan keputusan di tempat kerja. Konsep DI, yang menekankan prinsip kesetaraan, akuntabilitas, dan pembagian kekuasaan, terbukti efektif memperkuat rasa memiliki dan meningkatkan kualitas keputusan dalam organisasi. Oleh karena itu, fokus kajian diarahkan pada bagaimana mengintegrasikan kompetensi sosio-politik termasuk kemampuan berunding dan kesadaran partisipatif ke dalam pembelajaran vokasi tanpa mengabaikan keterampilan teknis. Solusi strategis diwujudkan melalui tiga pilar utama: integrasi kurikulum, kolaborasi industri, dan dukungan kebijakan. Penelitian ini berargumen bahwa pendidikan vokasi yang berorientasi DI tidak hanya meningkatkan relevansi lulusan terhadap tantangan industri modern dan digitalisasi, tetapi juga berkontribusi langsung pada kesejahteraan sosial pekerja.

Industrial Democracy and Vocational Education in Building a Participatory Culture and Social Justice in the World of Work

Abstract

This research examines the integration of the concept of Industrial Democracy (ID) into Indonesian vocational education to address the limitations of the overly instrumental link and match approach. While the link and match model successfully produces technically competent graduates, it fails to equip them with socio-political competencies (such as awareness of workers' rights, negotiation skills, and understanding of industrial relations), rendering graduates vulnerable and limiting their participation in workplace decision-making. The ID concept, which emphasizes the principles of equality, accountability, and power-sharing, has proven effective in fostering ownership and improving the quality of organizational decisions. Therefore, the study focuses on how to integrate socio-political competencies including negotiation abilities and participatory awareness into vocational learning without neglecting technical skills. The strategic solution is realized through three main pillars: curriculum integration, industry collaboration, and policy support This research argues that ID-oriented vocational education not only enhances the relevance of graduates to the challenges of modern industry and digitalization but also directly impact the social welfare of workers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Billett, S. (2014) Mimetic learning at work. Dordrecht: Springer.

Busemeyer, M.R. and Trampusch, C. (eds.) (2011) The political economy of collective skill formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599431.001.0001

Cedefop (2019) European skills index 2018. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2801/564143

Council of Europe (2025a) Learning democracy in vocational education and training (VET). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

Council of Europe (2025b) Learning democracy in vocational education and training in Europe: An anthology. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

Creswell, J.W. (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Euler, D. (2023) Roadmap to high-quality dual vocational education and training. Bonn: Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB). https://doi.org/10.11586/2023061

Frega, R. (2021) ‘Employee involvement and workplace democracy’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(4), pp. 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McGrath, S. and Russon, J.-A. (2023) ‘TVET SI: Towards sustainable vocational education and training: Thinking beyond the formal’, Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 39, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v39i.03

Müller-Jentsch, W. (2019) ‘Industrial democracy: Historical development and current challenges’, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 25(1), pp. 1–15.

OECD (2019) OECD skills strategy 2019: Skills to shape a better future. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264313835-en

Raelin, J.A. (2013) ‘The manager as facilitator of dialogue’, Organization, 20(6), pp. 818–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412455085

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kartini, R., Gusti, T. S., Lubis, A. F. T., Abdullah, R., & Hidayat, H. (2025). Demokrasi Industri dan Pendidikan Vokasi dalam Membangun Budaya Partisipatif dan Keadilan Sosial di Dunia Kerja. Empiricism Journal, 6(4), 2474-2481. https://doi.org/10.36312/1rvpst35