Epistemologi Lokal dan Sains Modern: Tinjauan Kritis Filsafat Sains terhadap Pengetahuan Ekologis Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Tambora
Downloads
How to Cite
Diskursus mengenai relasi antara pengetahuan lokal dan sains modern semakin menempati posisi penting dalam kajian lingkungan dan keberlanjutan. Pengetahuan ekologis berbasis kearifan lokal tidak lagi dipahami semata sebagai praktik budaya, melainkan sebagai sistem epistemik yang memiliki rasionalitas, validitas kontekstual, dan kapasitas adaptif yang tinggi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk meninjau secara kritis bagaimana epistemologi lokal diposisikan dalam literatur ilmiah serta bagaimana relasinya dengan sains modern, dengan refleksi konseptual pada kearifan lokal Tambora. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan review literatur naratif-kritis terhadap jurnal internasional dan nasional bereputasi yang membahas pengetahuan ekologis lokal, epistemologi sains, dan pengelolaan lingkungan berkelanjutan. Hasil review menunjukkan bahwa meskipun pengetahuan lokal semakin diakui dalam praktik kebijakan dan pengelolaan sumber daya alam, posisinya masih sering direduksi secara instrumental dan belum sepenuhnya diakui sebagai sumber epistemik yang setara dengan sains modern. Literatur mutakhir menekankan pentingnya pluralisme epistemologis, keadilan epistemik, dan pendekatan berbasis tempat dalam memahami kompleksitas sistem sosial–ekologis. Dalam konteks Tambora, epistemologi lokal berpotensi memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan yang lebih kontekstual, relasional, dan berorientasi pada keberlanjutan.
Local Epistemology and Modern Science: a Critical Philosophy of Science Review of Ecological Knowledge Based on Tambora Local Wisdom
Abstract
The relationship between local knowledge and modern science has become an increasingly important topic in environmental and sustainability studies. Local ecological knowledge grounded in indigenous and local wisdom is no longer understood merely as cultural practice, but as an epistemic system with its own rationality, contextual validity, and adaptive capacity. This article aims to critically review how local epistemologies are positioned within scientific literature and how they relate to modern science, with a conceptual reflection on the local wisdom of the Tambora region. The study employs a critical narrative literature review of reputable international and national journals addressing local ecological knowledge, epistemology of science, and sustainable environmental management. The review findings indicate that although local knowledge is increasingly acknowledged in environmental governance and resource management practices, it is often incorporated instrumentally and not fully recognized as an autonomous epistemic source equivalent to modern science. Recent literature emphasizes the importance of epistemological pluralism, epistemic justice, and place-based approaches for understanding the complexity of social–ecological systems. In the context of Tambora, local epistemology demonstrates strong potential to contribute to the development of scientific knowledge that is more contextual, relational, and sustainability-oriented. This review contributes to contemporary philosophy of science by reinforcing the legitimacy of local knowledge as an integral component of inclusive and reflexive knowledge production.
Agrawal, A. (2024). Indigenous knowledge and the politics of sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 68, 101148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2024.101148
Akalibey, A. (2024). Integrating indigenous knowledge and culture in sustainable forest management. Journal of Forest Science, 70(6), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.17221/34/2024-JFS
Albar, H., Arifin, H., Aminah, R., & Fitriani, N. (2025). Pengetahuan ekologis lokal dan keberlanjutan pengelolaan lingkungan berbasis kearifan lokal. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan Indonesia, 23(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.23.1.15-27
Barzegar, M., Smith, L., & Johnson, P. (2025). Indigenous ecological knowledge and adaptive local initiatives in social–ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 83, 102706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2025.102706
Berkes, F. (2024). Sacred ecology and indigenous knowledge in the Anthropocene. Ecology and Society, 29(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-15021-290302
Caviedes, J., Rojas, P., & Molina, A. (2024). Indigenous and local knowledge on social–ecological change and livelihood resilience. World Development, 176, 106530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106530
Chairunnisa, R. (2024). Epistemologi pengetahuan lokal dalam pengelolaan sumber daya alam berkelanjutan. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 7(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v7i2.2024
Daniel, D., Müller, F., & Hartmann, T. (2022). To what extent does indigenous local knowledge support the social–ecological system? Resources, 11(12), 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11120106
Dean, A. J. (2024). The framing of indigenous and local ecological knowledge in global environmental discourse. Global Environmental Politics, 24(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00721
Fauzia, N. (2024). Integrasi kearifan lokal dalam pengelolaan lingkungan hidup. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota, 20(3), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpwk.2024.345
Ghazali, M., Husna, H., & Sukiman. (2024). Kearifan lokal dan pengetahuan ekologis masyarakat adat di Indonesia. Jurnal Biologi Tropis, 24(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbt.v24i2.2024
Hill, R., Walsh, F. J., Davies, J., & Holmes, M. C. (2024). Working with indigenous knowledge in sustainability science. Nature Sustainability, 7(5), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01241-3
Ijatuyi, E. J. (2025). Integration of indigenous knowledge with scientific knowledge for sustainable environmental management: A systematic review. Environmental Development, 45, 100862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.100862
Karpe, M. (2025). Pengetahuan lokal sebagai basis pengelolaan lingkungan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 14(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v14i1.2025
Latip, A., Kurniawan, D., & Yildirim, I. (2024). Local and indigenous knowledge integration in science learning: Epistemological implications. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(3), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.2710
Naves, L. C., Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Johnson, N., & Alessa, L. (2025). Integrating indigenous knowledge across homelands and scientific knowledge for harvest management. Ecology and Society, 30(4), 10. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-15361-300410
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
Perez, C., Martin, A., & Smith, H. (2024). Local ecological knowledge in interdisciplinary research and application: A critical review. Ecological Economics, 215, 108001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108001
Reyes-García, V., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., & McElwee, P. (2024). Place-based epistemologies and sustainability science. One Earth, 7(4), 512–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.03.006
Saputra, D. (2024). Pengetahuan tradisional dan sains modern dalam pengelolaan ekosistem. Jurnal Sains Lingkungan, 10(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsl.vol10.iss2.art6
Silva-Ávila, L., Pereira, L., & Bennett, E. (2025). Knowledge alliances for global change adaptation: Bridging indigenous knowledge and science. Sustainability, 17(8), 3653. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083653
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukiman, S., Lestari, D., & Pratama, R. (2024). Pengetahuan ekologis lokal dan konservasi biodiversitas. Jurnal Konservasi Alam, 18(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.29244/jka.18.1.33-45
Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., & Folke, C. (2022). Braiding knowledge systems: Integrating indigenous, local, and scientific knowledge. Ambio, 51(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01555-y
Turnhout, E., Tuinstra, W., & Halffman, W. (2024). Epistemic justice and environmental knowledge systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 152, 103588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103588
Whyte, K. P. (2024). Indigenous science and relational epistemologies in environmental governance. Environmental Ethics, 46(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20244612
Yuliana, S., & Prasetyo, B. (2025). Kearifan lokal sebagai sumber epistemologi lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat dan Pemikiran Islam, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20414/jfpi.v9i1.2025
Zari, M. P., Blaschke, P., & Jackson, B. (2025). Indigenous knowledge-driven nature-based solutions for sustainability transitions. Environmental Science & Policy, 156, 103713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.103713
Copyright (c) 2026 Gunawan Gunawan, Muhammad Sarjan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
