Pengembangan Rubrik Penilaian Keterampilan Proses Sains pada Praktikum Laju Reaksi Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Lombok
Downloads
How to Cite
Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengembangkan rubrik penilaian keterampilan proses sains pada laju reaksi berbasis kearifan lokal Lombok. Penelitian ini termasuk sebagai penelitian pengembangan dengan metode pengembangan dan validasi yang diadaptasi dari Adams dan Wieman. Draft rubrik yang telah dirancang divalidasi oleh 5 orang validator ahli yang berasal dari guru kimia dan dosen kimia. Hasil validasi menggunakan rumurs Aiken’s menunjukkan item rubrik dinyatakan valid. Pengujian reliabilitas menggunakan Interclass Correlation Coeffecient (ICC) menunjukkan skor 0,512 yang termasuk dalam kategori moderat. Draft rubrik keterampilan proses sains pada tiap faktor berbeda. Keterampilan proses sains pada tiap faktor (luas permukaan, suhu, konsentrasi, dan katalis) yang muncul berturut-turut sebanyak 4, 5, 6, dan 6 keterampilan. Uji coba terbatas dilakukan pada satu kelompok siswa yang melakukan praktikum laju reaksi pada faktor suhu terhadap laju fermentasi tape ketan sebagai pangan tradisional Lombok. Hasil ujicoba terbatas menunjukkan bahwa keterampilan proses sains muncul pada aktivitas praktikum. Hanya saja, keterampilan menyusun grafik dari siswa masih tergolong rendah. Rubrik keterampilan proses sains masih bisa dikembangkan lebih lanjut untuk mata praktikum kimia lainnya.
Development of a Science Process Skills Rubric for Reaction Rate Practicum Based on Local Lombok Wisdom
Abstract
This study aims to develop a rubric for assessing science process skills in reaction rate contexts, grounded in local Lombok wisdom. It is classified as a development research using the development and validation method adapted from Adams and Wieman. The draft rubric was validated by five expert validators—comprising chemistry teachers and chemistry lecturers. Validation results using Aiken’s V formula indicated that all rubric items were deemed valid. Reliability testing using the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) yielded a score of 0.512, categorized as moderate. The draft rubric revealed differing science process skills across each factor. Specifically, the number of observed science process skills was as follows: 4 for surface area, 5 for temperature, 6 for concentration, and 6 for catalysts. A limited trial was conducted with one group of students performing a practical experiment on the effect of temperature on the rate of fermentation of glutinous rice tape—a traditional Lombok food. The trial results showed that science process skills emerged during the practical activity. However, students’ ability to construct graphs was still relatively low. The science process skills rubric remains eligible for further development and adaptation for other chemistry laboratory courses.
Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2010). Development and Validation of Instruments to Measure Learning of Expert‐Like Thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1289–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.512369
Agan, Ş. and Deni̇z, S. (2019). A rubric study for assessing paragraph level written texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v8i1.4610
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Al-Ghazo, A. and Ta’amneh, I. (2021). Evaluation: and grading of students' writing: holistic and analytic scoring rubrics. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 9(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v9i1.19060
Anggrella, D. and Sudrajat, A. (2024). Development of an integrated project-based learning module based on black soybean ethnoscience to improve students' science process skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Ipa, 10(6), 3038-3045. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.5855
Angra, A. and Gardner, S. (2018). The graph rubric: development of a teaching, learning, and research tool. Cbe—life Sciences Education, 17(4), ar65. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-01-0007
Arabacıoğlu, S. and Ünver, A. (2016). Supporting inquiry based laboratory practices with mobile learning to enhance students’ process skills in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(2), 216-231. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.216
Arrufat, M. and Dandis, M. (2016). Rubrics in a secondary mathematics class. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/282
Awaliyah, M., Wıdodo, W., & Haryono, E. (2023). Development of flipbooks based on guided inquiry models to train science process skills of junior high school students on temperature and heat materials. Ijorer International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 4(6), 899-908. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v4i6.407
Aydogdu, B. (2015). The investigation of science process skills of science teachers in terms of some variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 582-594
Baharudin, H., Maskor, Z., & Matore, M. (2022). The raters’ differences in arabic writing rubrics through the many-facet rasch measurement model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988272
Bain, K., Rodriguez, J.-M. G., & Towns, M. H. (2019). Investigating student understanding of rate constants: When is a constant “constant”? Journal of Chemical Education, 96(8), 1571–1577. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00005.
Bernard, P., Stelmachowski, P., Broś, P., Makowski, W., & Kotarba, A. (2021). Demonstration of the Influence of Specific Surface Area on Reaction Rate in Heterogeneous Catalysis. Journal of chemical education, 98(3), 935–940. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01101
Becker, A. (2016). Student-generated scoring rubrics: examining their formative value for improving esl students’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 29, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002
Bulent, A. (2015). The investigation of science process skills of science teachers in terms of some variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(5), 582-594. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2015.2097
Chaniago, A., Kartika, W., & Siburian, J. (2023). Development of animal development practicum guide based on science process skills embryogenesis observation material. Jurnal Bioeduin Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.15575/bioeduin.v13i1.24361
Chu, H. (2022). The implementation of different types of rubrics in a hong kong secondary school. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 9(2), 108. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v9i22022p108
Correa-Rojas, J. (2021). Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: Applications to estimate the temporal stability of a measuring instrument. Ciencias Psicológicas, 15(2), e-2318. doi: https://doi.org/10.22235/cp.v15i2.2318
Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D., Parasdila, H., Hadijah, S., & Perdana, R. (2019). Practicum guide: basic physics based of science process skill. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7420
Dawson, P. (2015). Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
Fahmi, N. & Nurrahman. (2011). Kadar Glukosa, Alkohol dan Citarasa Tape Onggok Berdasarkan Lama Fermentasi. Jurnal Pangan dan Gizi, 02(03):25–42.
Garcia-Ros, R., Ruescas-Nicolau, M. A., Cezón-Serrano, N., Flor-Rufino, C., Martin-Valenzuela, C. S., & Sánchez-Sánchez, M. L. (2024). Improving assessment of procedural skills in health sciences education: a validation study of a rubrics system in neurophysiotherapy. BMC psychology, 12(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01643-7
Golnik, Karl C., Motley, W., Atilla, …..and Zhao, Kanxing. (2012). The ophthalmology surgical competency assessment rubric for strabismus surgery. Neurology. 1645.
https://scholar.barrowneuro.org/neurology/1645
Habib, S. (2018). Rubric system for evaluation of crown preparation performed by dental students. European Journal of Dental Education, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12333
Hadibarata, T., Hidayat, T., & Kwabena, J. (2024). The use of scoring rubrics in university. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v3i1.312
Hasbullah. 2016. Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berorientasi Keterampilan Proses dalam Pembelajaran Saintifik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Peserta didik Pada Pokok Bahasan Sistem Pencernaan Manusia. Jurnal pendidikan biologi, 7 (2): 121-128
Hassell, D. and Lee, K. (2020). Evaluation of multi-peer and self-assessment in higher education. International Journal of Innovative Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijitlhe.2020010104
Hikmawati, H., Kusmiyati, K., & Sutrio, S. (2020). Keterampilan Psikomotor Siswa Dalam Melakukan Kegiatan Percobaan Tentang Suhu Dan Kalor Menggunakan Media Tiga Dimensi Dan Simulasi Komputer. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/jppfi.v1i1.11
Isnaini, A. I., & Utami, L. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Psikomotorik Siswa dalam Praktikum Laju Reaksi . Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry, 12(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.22437/jisic.v12i1.9054
Jeong, H. (2015). Rubrics in the classroom: do teachers really follow them?. Language Testing in Asia, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-015-0013-5
Kartini, K. (2019). Deskripsi Perkembangan Keterampilan Dasar Kerja Laboratorium Kimia Siswa SMA Negeri 1 Singaraja. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 6(1), 21-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1596
Kato, M. (2022). Examining the dependability and practicality of analytic rubric of summary writing using multivariate generalizability theory: focusing on japanese university students with lower-intermediate proficiency in english. English Language Teaching, 15(9), 82. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n9p82
Kemdikbud RI. (2014). Amanat kurikulum 2013 melalui Pendekatan Saintifik. https://gurudikdas.dikdasmen.go.id/news/Amanat-Kurikulum-2013-Melalui-Pendekatan-Saintifik
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lee, K., Hassell, D., Salleh, S., & Munohsamy, T. (2021). Online-based rubric for peer assessment: effectiveness and implications. Saltel Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning), 4(2), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v4i2.76
Mashami, R. A., Suryati , S. ., Harisanti, B. M. ., & Khery, Y. . (2023). Identification of Local Wisdom of The Sasak Tribe In Chemistry Learning as an Effort to Strengthen Student Character . Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2434
O’Donnell, J., Oakley, M., Haney, S., O’Neill, P., & Taylor, D. (2011). Rubrics 101: a primer for rubric development in dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 75(9), 1163-1175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2011.75.9.tb05160.x
Pangajuanto, T. (2020). Peningkatan Kompetensi Menimbang Dengan Neraca Analitis Melalui Model Pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) Pada Siswa Kelas KI A SMK Negeri 2 Sukoharjo Semester 1 Tahun Pelajaran 2019/2020. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 69-74. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i1.41409
Prasetyo, A., & Rasmiyana, R. (2025). Variasi Substrat dan Waktu pada Fermentasi Tapai: Tinjauan Narasi. Jurnal Teknologi Pangan Dan Industri Perkebunan (LIPIDA), 5(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.58466/lipida.v5i1.1765
Portney, L.G., Watkins, M.P. (2009). Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education
Purba, L.S.L., Tamansa, A.A., ….& Harefa, H.I. (2024). Analysis of The Need for Chemical Learning Media Based on Local Wisdom in Sitaro Island. The Journal of Innovation in Chemistry Education, 6(1): 68-79. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jipk/article/view/57355
Reddy, M. (2011). Design and development of rubrics to improve assessment outcomes. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(1), 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881111107771
Regan, K., Evmenova, A., Mergen, R., Verbiest, C., Hutchison, A., Murnan, R., … & Gafurov, B. (2023). The feasibility of using virtual professional development to support teachers in making data–based decisions to improve students’ writing. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 38(1), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12301
Rengganis, D., Mukti, G.W., Deliana, Y., & Esperanza, D. (2018). Model Bisnis Olahan Singkong Pada Usaha Peuyeum Abbas Sawargi Kecamatan Cimenyan Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 4(2):121–38. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v4i2.1174.
Rodriguez, J. M. G., Santos-Diaz, S., Bain, K., & Towns, M. H. (2018). Using symbolic and graphical forms to analyze students’ mathematical reasoning in chemical kinetics. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(12), 2114–2125.
Saragih, I., Sudrajat, A., & Silaban, S. (2024). Pengembangan Rubrik Asesmen Kinerja Siswa Pada Praktikum Titrasi Asam-Basa. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(2), 2365-2376. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.719
Sukarno, Permanasari, A., & Idah, H. (2013). The Profile of Science Process Skills Student at Secondary High School (Case Study in Jambi). International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research, 1, 79-83.
Tamyiz, M., Ismet, & Yusup, M. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa dalam Membuat Grafik pada Pokok Bahasan Kinematika di SMA N 1 Indralaya. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 1(02), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v1i02.263
Tomás, C., Whitt, E., Lavelle-Hill, R., & Severn, K. (2019). Modeling holistic marks with analytic rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00089
Uhl, J., Sripathi, K., Saldanha, J., Moscarella, R., Merrill, J., Urban‐Lurain, M., … & Haudek, K. (2020). Introductory biology undergraduate students' mixed ideas about genetic information flow. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 49(3), 372-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21483
Utami Azzahra, Yohana, Wuri Julita, & Afifatul Achyar. (2023). Pengaruh Lama Fermentasi Dalam Pembuatan Tape Singkong (Manihot utilissima). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi, 2(2), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.24036/prosemnasbio/vol2/476
Varela, J. and Giralt, E. (2018). Rubrics for developing students’ professional judgement: a study of sustainable assessment in arts education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.06.001
Winke, P. and Lim, H. (2015). Esl essay raters’ cognitive processes in applying the jacobs et al. rubric: an eye-movement study. Assessing Writing, 25, 38-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.05.002
Yamanishi, H., Ono, M., & Hijikata, Y. (2019). Developing a scoring rubric for l2 summary writing: a hybrid approach combining analytic and holistic assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-019-0087-6
Yeo, S., Signorelli, C., Vo, K., & Smith, G. (2024). A retrospective cohort analysis comparing analytic and holistic marking rubrics in medical research education. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241277337
Yune, S., Lee, S., Im, S., Kam, B., & Baek, S. (2018). Holistic rubric vs. analytic rubric for measuring clinical performance levels in medical students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1228-9
Yustiandi dan Saepuzaman, D. (2017). Profil kemampuan interpretasi grafik kinematika siswa SMA kelas X. Gravity, 3(1). https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/Gravity/article/viewFile/2410/1873
Zamista, A. A & Kaniawati, I. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Kognitif Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. Edusains, 7(2): 191-201, https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/edusains/article/view/1815
Copyright (c) 2026 Marjan Marjan, Nova Kurnia, Sutrato Sutrato, Lovy Herayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
