Strategi Inovatif Guru Berbasis Systems Thinking Untuk Kelancaran Membaca Siswa(Studi di Kelas II SDN 3 Plampang Sumbawa)
Downloads
How to Cite
Kemampuan membaca permulaan merupakan fondasi utama pendidikan dasar yang menentukan keberhasilan akademik siswa. Namun, realita di kelas II SDN 3 Plampang menunjukkan hampir separuh siswa mengalami kesulitan kelancaran membaca (reading fluency), seperti lambatnya decoding dan kesalahan fonologis, akibat pendekatan pembelajaran konvensional yang linear. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan implementasi, kendala, dan dampak strategi inovatif guru berbasis Systems Thinking dalam meningkatkan kemampuan membaca permulaan siswa. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SDN 3 Plampang, Kabupaten Sumbawa. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi partisipatif, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi. Informan penelitian meliputi guru kelas II, siswa, kepala sekolah, dan orang tua. Analisis data menerapkan model interaktif Miles dan Huberman yang mencakup reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan, dengan uji keabsahan melalui triangulasi sumber dan teknik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi inovatif guru berbasis Systems Thinking diterapkan secara holistik melalui metode multisensori, bimbingan scaffolding individu, dan pembelajaran kolaboratif tutor sebaya. Kendala utama yang dihadapi meliputi keterbatasan fasilitas media literasi berjenjang, heterogenitas kemampuan siswa yang tinggi, serta rendahnya dukungan literasi di lingkungan keluarga. Meskipun demikian, penerapan strategi sistemik ini terbukti memberikan dampak signifikan terhadap peningkatan kelancaran membaca siswa, mereduksi kesalahan fonologis, mempercepat otomatisasi visual-auditori, serta mengubah model mental siswa menjadi lebih termotivasi dan percaya diri dalam belajar. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pendekatan berpikir sistem efektif mentransformasi ekosistem literasi dasar di sekolah secara adaptif dan berkelanjutan.
Systems Thinking-Based Innovative Teacher Strategies to Improve Students’ Reading Fluency: A Study in Grade II at SDN 3 Plampang, Sumbawa
Abstract
Early reading ability is the fundamental foundation of primary education that determines students' academic success. However, reality in Grade II at SDN 3 Plampang shows that nearly half of the students experience reading fluency difficulties, such as slow decoding and phonological errors, due to conventional, linear learning approaches. This study aims to describe the implementation, constraints, and impact of innovative teacher strategies based on Systems Thinking in improving students' early reading skills. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, this research was conducted at SDN 3 Plampang, Sumbawa Regency. Data were collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The research informants included the Grade II teacher, students, the school principal, and parents. Data analysis applied the Miles and Huberman interactive model, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification, with trustworthiness tested through source and technique triangulation. The results show that innovative teacher strategies based on Systems Thinking are implemented holistically through multisensory methods, individual scaffolding guidance, and peer-tutor collaborative learning. The main constraints encountered include limited leveled literacy media facilities, high student ability heterogeneity, and low literacy support in the family environment. Nevertheless, the implementation of this systemic strategy is proven to have a significant impact on improving students' reading fluency, reducing phonological errors, accelerating visual-auditory automatization, and shifting students' mental models to become more motivated and confident in learning. This study concludes that the systems thinking approach is effective in adaptively and sustainably transforming the basic literacy ecosystem in schools.
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140.
Ehri, L. C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5-21.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hidayat, A. (2022). Pendekatan berpikir sistemik dalam transformasi mutu pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 145-158.
Kemendikbud. (2021). Panduan Pembelajaran Literasi di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21.
Kurniawan, D. (2019). Dinamika Metode Pembelajaran Membaca Awal di Sekolah Dasar Konteks Daerah Terpencil (Disertasi Doktoral tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Negeri Malang.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: A theoretical context for interpreting the effects of frequency, context, and attention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 123-146.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pratiwi, I. (2019). Analisis kemampuan membaca permulaan dan dampaknya terhadap hasil belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 34-45.
Rahmawati, E. (2021). Identifikasi kesalahan fonologis pada anak kesulitan membaca di kelas awal. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(3), 212-225.
Rasinski, T. V. (2012). Why reading fluency should be hot! Reading Teacher, 65(8), 516-522.
Richmond, B. (1993). Systems thinking: Critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9(2), 113-133.
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-407.
Suryani, N. (2020). Korelasi Keterampilan Membaca Permulaan Kelas Rendah Terhadap Pemahaman Teks Kompleks Siswa Kelas Tinggi SDN di Kabupaten Sumbawa (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Mataram.
UNESCO. (2017). More Than One-Half of Children and Adolescents Are Not Learning Worldwide. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
World Bank. (2020). The Human Capital Index 2020 Update: Human Capital in the Time of COVID-19. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Copyright (c) 2026 Maya Susilawati, Ahmad Yamin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
