Standar Isi Artikel Penelitian: Komponen Detail untuk Dipublikasikan di Jurnal Ilmiah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v3i1.668Keywords:
artikel ilmiah, standar isi, publikasi ilmiahAbstract
Peningkatan publikasi ilmiah Indonesia pada jurnal ilmiah mengalami peningkatan pesat. Pada tahun 2019-2020, Indonesia bahkan berada pada peringkat 1 di ASEAN. Sayangnya peningkatan jumlah publikasi tersebut tidak dibarengi dengan peningkatan jumlah sitasi sehingga menunjukkan minimnya kualitas tulisan ilmiah Indonesia. Permasalahan tersebut dapat disebabkan oleh kurangnya kemampuan dalam menulis karya tulis ilmiah. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan standar isi pada tiap komponen artikel ilmiah seperti abstrak, pendahuluan, metode, hasil dan pembahasan, dan kesimpulan/implikasi. Tiap komponen tersebut setidaknya berisi 200-250 kata yang terdiri dari 18 paragraf sehingga total jumlah kata pada satu artikel ilmiah adalah 3600-4500 kata. Detail isi pada setiap paragraph dijelaskan lebihlanjut pada artikel ini.
Standard Content of Research Paper: Detail Component to Get Publish in Scientific Journal
Abstract
The increase of Indonesian scientific publications in scientific journals has increased rapidly. In 2019-2020, Indonesia is even ranked 1st in ASEAN. Unfortunately, the increase in the number of publications was not accompanied by an increase in the number of citations, thus indicating the low quality of Indonesian scientific writings. These problems can be caused by a lack of ability in writing scientific papers. This article aimed to describe the content standards for each component of scientific articles such as abstracts, introductions, methods, results and discussion, and conclusions/implications. The components of the scientific article must contain at least 200-250 words consisting of 18 paragraphs so that the total number of words in one scientific article is 3600-4500 words. Details of the contents of each paragraph are explained further in this article.
Downloads
References
Abt, G., Boreham, C., Davison, G., Jackson, R., Nevill, A., Wallace, E., & Williams, M. (2020). Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(17), 1933–1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1776002
Ahlstrom, D. (2012). Several key reasons why a paper is likely to be rejected at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(3), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9315-7
Albarran, J. W., & Scholes, J. (2005). How to get published: Seven easy steps. Nursing in Critical Care, 10(2), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1362-1017.2005.00105.x
Bastos, J. L., Duquia, R. P., González-Chica, D. A., Mesa, J. M., & Bonamigo, R. R. (2014). Field work I: Selecting the instrument for data collection. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 89(6), 918–923. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143884
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices (Second edition). Anol Bhattacherjee.
Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent Variables in Psychology and the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239
Caric, M., Caric, O., & Smiesko, O. (2013). Construction and techniques of writing a scientific paper in natural and engineering sciences. Zbornik Matice Srpske Za Prirodne Nauke, 125, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSPN1325119C
Cloutier, C. (2016). How I Write: An Inquiry Into the Writing Practices of Academics. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615585875
Dirjendikti. (2012). Surat Keputusan Dirjen Dikti No. 152/E/T/2021 tentang Publikasi Karya Ilmiah. Kemendikbud. luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/SKDirjen152-E-T-2012KaryaIlmiah.pdf
Ecarnot, F., Seronde, M.-F., Chopard, R., Schiele, F., & Meneveau, N. (2015). Writing a scientific article: A step-by-step guide for beginners. European Geriatric Medicine, 6(6), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2015.08.005
Elangovan, N., & Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX, 8, 101326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326
Feldman, D. C. (2003). Sense and Sensibility: Balancing the Interests of Authors, Reviewers, and Editors. Journal of Management, 29(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630302900102
Fischer, E., Gopaldas, A., & Scaraboto, D. (2017). Why papers are rejected and how to get yours accepted: Advice on the construction of interpretive consumer research articles. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0051
Gopaldas, A. (2016). A front-to-back guide to writing a qualitative research article. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-08-2015-0074
Griffiths, P., & Norman, I. (2016). Why was my paper rejected? Editors’ reflections on common issues which influence decisions to reject papers submitted for publication in academic nursing journals. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 57, A1–A4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.017
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (Eighth edition). Cengage.
Hartley, J. (2004). Current findings from research on structured abstracts. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 92(3), 368–371.
Hernon, P., & Schwartz, C. (2007). What is a problem statement? Library & Information Science Research, 29(3), 307–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.06.001
Hoogenboom, B. J., & Manske, R. C. (2012). How to write a scientific article. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 7(5), 512–517.
Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2021). A Practical Guide to Instrument Development and Score Validation in the Social Sciences: The MEASURE Approach. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7275/SVG4-E671
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Fourth edition). The Guilford Press.
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). What Is A Theoretical Framework? A Practical Answer. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(7), 593–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9443-2
Lor, P. J. (2019). International and comparative librarianship: Concepts and methods for global studies. De Gruyter Saur.
Mack, C. A. (2018). How to write a good scientific paper. SPIE Press.
Maxwell, S. E. (2000). Sample size and multiple regression analysis. Psychological Methods, 5(4), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.5.4.434
Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
Mooi, E., Sarstedt, M., & Mooi-Reci, I. (2018). Market Research. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5218-7
National Information Standards Organization. (2014). Demand driven acquisition of monographs: A recommended practice of the National Information Standards Organization. http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/13373/rp-20-2014_DDA.pdf
Newman, I., & Covrig, D. M. (2013). Building consistency between title, problem statement, purpose, & research questions to improve the quality of research plans and reports: New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 25(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha.20009
Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press.
Watson, R. (2021). Writing for Publication: The Journal Article. In K. Holland & R. Watson (Eds.), Writing for Publication in Nursing and Healthcare (1st ed., pp. 62–97). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119583592.ch5
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Asy'ari, Muhammad Roil Bilad, Muhali Muhali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
