The Effect of Artificial Intelligence Tools on EFL Students’ Writing Skills: A Mixed-Methods Study at Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi
Downloads
How to Cite
Although artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been incorporated into EFL writing instruction, previous research has largely focused on overall writing performance, with less attention to changes across specific writing dimensions and students’ actual experiences of using AI during the writing process. This study examined the effect of AI-assisted instruction on EFL students’ writing performance, with particular attention to five writing dimensions—content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics and explored how students used and experienced AI during writing. Using a quasi-experimental explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, the study involved 60 English Language Education students at Universitas Panca Sakti Bekasi, equally divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group engaged in AI-assisted writing activities integrated into regular writing tasks, while the control group received conventional instruction. Pre- and post-test writing scores were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANCOVA, complemented by semi-structured interviews and AI Usage Logs. The experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in overall writing performance than the control group (F = 381.24, p < .001, partial η² = .870), with significant differences across all five dimensions. Language use showed the largest raw gain, whereas mechanics yielded the largest effect size. AI Usage Logs further showed that students primarily used AI for language feedback, idea generation, vocabulary enrichment, and revision. The findings indicate a substantial effect within the specific instructional context and demonstrate the value of examining writing outcomes alongside students’ actual AI-use practices.
Agustin, N. Z., Cahyono, B. Y., & Agustina, F. R. (2025). College EFL students’ perception toward AI assistance in academic writing assignments. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v14i3.23636
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Fan, N. (2023). Exploring the effects of automated written corrective feedback on EFL students’ writing quality: A mixed-methods study. SAGE Open, 13(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181296
Jaya, S., & Susyla, D. (2024). Assessing students' perceptions of AI grammar and writing assistance tools: Implications for academic writing instruction. Teaching English and Language Learning English Journal, 4(3).
Kang, D. (2025). Direct vs. reformulation feedback through ChatGPT on EFL learners’ writings. Journal of Korean English Education Society, 24(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18649/jkees.2025.24.3.1
Karatay, Y., & Karatay, L. (2024). Automated writing evaluation use in second language classrooms: A research synthesis. System, 123, 103332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103332
Liu, Y., et al. (2025). The impact of integrating ChatGPT with teachers’ feedback on EFL writing skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 59, 101766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101766
Maghfiroh, T. G., & Akhiriyah, S. (2025). EFL learners’ perception of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for academic writing: Benefits and challenges. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v4i8.994
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2236469. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Meniado, J. C., Huyen, D. T. T., Panyadilokpong, N., & Lertkomolwit, P. (2024). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313
Mun, C. (2024). EFL learners’ English writing feedback and their perception of using ChatGPT. STEM Journal, 25(2), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2024.25.2.26
Nguyen, D. M. Q. (2026). The role of ChatGPT in providing written corrective feedback for EFL academic writing: A literature review. International Journal of AI in Language Education. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.26313
Poláková, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
Prasetya, R., Syarif, A., & Mayof, A. (2026). Comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Grammarly in supporting grammar correction and writing development in EFL students. Journal of English and Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v12i1.44160
Pratiwig, A. C., et al. (2024). ChatGPT affordances and Indonesian EFL students’ perceptions in L2 writing: A collaborative reflexive thematic analysis. Changing English, 32(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2024.2418132
Rad, H. S., Alipour, R., & Jafarpour, A. (2024). Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome: A case of Wordtune application. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(9), 5020–5040. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2208170
Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024). A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research. ReCALL, 36(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344023000265
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Suryanto, S., Islami, N., Alsolami, T., & Shinjee, B. (2026). AI-assisted writing in EFL education: Students’ experiences with QuillBot. Teaching English as a Foreign Language Journal, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.12928/tefl.v5i1.2120
Teng, M. F. (2024). A systematic review of ChatGPT for English as a Foreign Language writing: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.58304/ijts.20240304
Wang, et al. (2025). Generative AI-assisted feedback and EFL writing: A study on proficiency, revision frequency and writing quality. Discover Education, 4, 170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00602-7
Woo, D. J., Wang, D., Guo, K., & Susanto, H. (2024). Teaching EFL students to write with ChatGPT: Students’ motivation to learn, cognitive load, and satisfaction with the learning process. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24963–24990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12819-4
Xiao, Y., & Zhi, Y. (2023). An exploratory study of EFL learners’ use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages, 8(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030212
Yang, Y., Hussin, S., & Hashim, H. (2025). Revising with intelligence: ChatGPT feedback and its impact on EFL students’ revision and self-efficacy. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9845
Yin, X., Dou, K., & Han, J. (2025). An AI-assisted critical thinking intervention to enhance undergraduate EFL learners’ writing proficiency. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 86, 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101480
Zhang, K., & Saeed, M. A. (2025). Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback on academic writing: A case study in Malaysia. Computers and Composition, 78, 102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102976
Zhang, Y., & Liu, Y. (2026). Designing ChatGPT-mediated feedback activities in EFL writing: A design-based study of the dialogic feedback triangle. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 51(1), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2571846
Zhou, et al. (2025). Translanguaging with generative AI in EFL writing: Students’ practices and perceptions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101181
Copyright (c) 2026 Subadar Subadar, Eryandi Eryandi, Deka Meuthia Novari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
