Perbedaan Kesadaran Metakognitif Berdasarkan Gender di SMA Negeri 1 Gunungsari
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jar.v2i1.2134Keywords:
Metacognition, Gender, Metacognitive Awareness, Learning StrategiesAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbedaan kesadaran metakognitif antara siswa laki-laki dan perempuan di SMA Negeri 1 Gunungsari. Kesadaran metakognitif, yang mencakup kemampuan untuk memantau, mengontrol, dan mengevaluasi proses berpikir, merupakan faktor penting dalam keberhasilan akademik. Penelitian deskriptif ini melibatkan 100 siswa kelas XI IPA, dengan 52 siswa laki-laki dan 48 siswa perempuan yang dipilih secara acak. Data dikumpulkan melalui angket metakognitif berbasis skala Likert dengan empat pilihan jawaban. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa perempuan memiliki kesadaran metakognitif yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa laki-laki pada hampir semua indikator yang diukur. Rata-rata nilai kesadaran metakognitif siswa perempuan adalah 2,65 (SD = 0,57), sementara rata-rata nilai siswa laki-laki adalah 2,58 (SD = 0,55). Perbedaan paling signifikan terlihat pada indikator perencanaan, dengan nilai rata-rata siswa perempuan sebesar 2,76 (SD = 0,58) dibandingkan dengan 2,61 (SD = 0,60) pada siswa laki-laki. Berdasarkan hasil ini, direkomendasikan agar strategi pembelajaran yang lebih responsif terhadap gender diterapkan, termasuk pendekatan yang lebih personal dan integrasi teknologi untuk mendukung pengembangan kesadaran metakognitif. Penelitian lanjutan diperlukan untuk mengeksplorasi lebih lanjut pengaruh faktor lain, seperti lingkungan belajar dan dukungan sosial, terhadap kesadaran metakognitif.
Gender Differences in Metacognitive Awareness at SMA Negeri 1 Gunungsari
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the differences in metacognitive awareness between male and female students at SMA Negeri 1 Gunungsari. Metacognitive awareness, encompassing the ability to monitor, control, and evaluate cognitive processes, is a critical factor in academic success. This descriptive study involved 100 randomly selected 11th-grade science students, consisting of 52 male and 48 female students. Data were collected using a Likert-scale-based metacognitive questionnaire with four response options. The results indicated that female students had higher metacognitive awareness than male students across most measured indicators. The average metacognitive awareness score for female students was 2.65 (SD = 0.57), compared to 2.58 (SD = 0.55) for male students. The most significant difference was observed in the planning indicator, with female students scoring an average of 2.76 (SD = 0.58) compared to 2.61 (SD = 0.60) for male students. Based on these findings, it is recommended that more gender-responsive learning strategies be implemented, including personalized approaches and the integration of technology to support the development of metacognitive awareness. Further research is needed to explore the influence of other factors, such as learning environments and social support, on metacognitive awareness.
References
Ahmad, N., & Sultana, M. A. (2021). Effects of metacognitive ability and selective attention ability on academic performance of adolescents. Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences, 30(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v30i1.51809
Al-gaseem, M., Bakkar, B., & Al-zoub?, S. (2020). Metacognitive thinking skills among talented science education students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.707205
Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Inquiry Learning Model in Improving Prospective Teachers’ Metacognition Knowledge and Metacognition Awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12229a
Azevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning, 15(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x
Cromley, J. G., & Kunze, A. J. (2020). Metacognition in education: Translational research. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000218
Dezhbankhan, F., Baranovich, D. L., Abedalaziz, N., & Dezhbankhan, S. (2020). Impacts of Metacognition Management System (MMS) Training Course on Metacognitive Competencies. International Education Studies, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n1p12
Ekici, F., Uluta?, B., & Atasoy, B. (2019). An Investigation of Preservice Teachers’ Levels of Metacognitive Awareness in Terms of Certain Variables. Bart?n University Journal of Faculty of Education, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.566640
Esbjørn, B. H., Sømhovd, M. J., Holm, J. M., Lønfeldt, N. N., Bender, P. K., Nielsen, S. K., & Reinholdt-Dunne, M. L. (2013). A structural assessment of the 30-item Metacognitions Questionnaire for Children and its relations to anxiety symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033793
Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2023). Self-regulated Learning Theory in Metacognitive-Based Teaching and Learning of High-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). TEM Journal, 12(4), 2530–2540. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM124-65
Hsiao, T., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing Theories of Language Learning Strategies: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00155
Kaur, M., & Embi, M. A. (2011). The Relationship between Language Learning Strategies and Gender among Primary School Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1432–1436. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.10.1432-1436
Koyuncu, ?., Bulus, M., & F?rat, T. (2022). The Moderator Role of Gender and Socioeconomic Status in the Relationship Between Metacognitive Skills and Reading Scores. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.55.9.3
Mahmud, M., & Nur, S. (2018). EXPLORING STUDENTS’ LEARNING STRATEGIES AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING. International Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4346
Muhali, M., Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2019). The Validity and Effectiveness of the Reflective-Metacognitive Learning Model to Improve Students’ Metacognition Ability in Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 33–74. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2019.16.2.2
Ozoji, B. E., Iliya, G. B., Garba, S. A., & Isuwa, S. D. (2022). Achieving Gender Equity in Nigerian Basic Science and Technology Classrooms with Metacognitive Skills Package. Kashere Journal of Education, 3(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.4314/kje.v3i1.20
Ratnayake, A., Bansal, A., Wong, N., Saseetharan, T., Prompiengchai, S., Jenne, A., Thiagavel, J., & Ashok, A. (2023). All “wrapped” up in reflection: Supporting metacognitive awareness to promote students’ self-regulated learning. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 25(1), e00103-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00103-23
Ruffing, S., Wach, F.-S., Spinath, F. M., Brünken, R., & Karbach, J. (2015). Learning strategies and general cognitive ability as predictors of gender- specific academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01238
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Siegel, M. A. (2012). Filling in the Distance Between Us: Group Metacognition During Problem Solving in a Secondary Education Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9326-z
Surati, D. S. (2021). Metacognitive Skills for the Integrated Problem Based Numbered Head Together Learning. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56(2), Article 2. http://jsju.org/index.php/journal/article/view/862
Synekop, O., Lavrysh, Y., Lukianenko, V., Ogienko, O., Lytovchenko, I., Stavytska, I., Halatsyn, K., & Vadaska, S. (2023). Development of Students’ Metacognitive Skills by Means of Educational Technologies in ESP Instruction at University. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/14.2/448
Was, C. A. (2014). Discrimination in measures of knowledge monitoring accuracy. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0161-y
Yu, B. (2024). A Correlation Study of Individual Differences Factors and Oral Chinese Learning Strategies: A Survey Based on Sri Lankan Learners. SHS Web of Conferences, 185, 01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202418501009
Zafarmand, A., Ghanizadeh, A., & Akbari, O. (2014). A Structural Equation Modeling of EFL Learners’ Goal Orientation, Metacognitive Awareness, and Self-efficacy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.6p.112
Zouhor, Z., Bogdanovi?, I., Skuban, S., & Pavkov-Hrvojevi?, M. (2017). THE EFFECT OF THE MODIFIED KNOW-WANT-LEARN STRATEGY ON SIXTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN PHYSICS. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), Continuous. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.946
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Baiq Ayu Retnasari, Muhammad Asy'ari, Saiful Prayogi, Muhali Muhali
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Authentic Research agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Journal of Authentic Research, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
