Prinsip Desain Video Pembelajaran Prosedural Otomotif: Systematic Review

Zifa  Oktavianza; Toto  Sugiarto; Wagino Wagino; Ahmad  Arif; Muslim Muslim

doi:10.36312/eex8m511

Authors

Zifa Oktavianza Universitas Negeri Padang
Toto Sugiarto Universitas Negeri Padang
Wagino Wagino Universitas Negeri Padang
Ahmad Arif Universitas Negeri Padang
Muslim Muslim Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/eex8m511

Keywords:

otomotif; PRISMA 2020; systematic literature review; video pembelajaran; vokasional

Abstract

Pengembangan video pembelajaran untuk pendidikan vokasional otomotif memerlukan dasar desain yang melampaui kualitas visual karena pembelajaran perawatan kemudi, rem, dan suspensi menuntut pemahaman prosedur, diagnosis gejala, penggunaan alat, keselamatan, dan evaluasi performa. Studi ini memetakan dan menyintesis prinsip desain video pembelajaran prosedural melalui systematic mapping review berbasis metadata Scopus dengan pelaporan alur seleksi mengacu pada PRISMA 2020. Pencarian pada 15 Januari 2025 menghasilkan 1.400 rekaman; setelah 34 duplikasi dihapus, 1.366 rekaman disaring dan 50 artikel dipertahankan untuk sintesis akhir berdasarkan relevansi tematik dan kontribusi konseptual. Empat klaster ditemukan: desain dan efektivitas video instruksional; interaktivitas, flipped learning, dan YouTube; VR/AR dan media praktikum; serta kesiapan implementasi TVET. Sintesis menghasilkan framework 10 komponen yang mengintegrasikan orientasi gejala, tujuan kompetensi, demonstrasi tersegmentasi, cue visual, narasi alasan teknis, keselamatan kerja, pertanyaan diagnosis, praktik terbimbing, rubrik performa, dan refleksi-remediasi. Kontribusi studi terletak pada penerjemahan prinsip multimedia learning ke konteks procedural cognition, diagnostic reasoning, skill transfer, dan safety performance dalam pembelajaran bengkel otomotif.

Instructional videos for automotive vocational education require design foundations that extend beyond visual quality because steering, brake, and suspension maintenance involves procedural understanding, symptom-based diagnosis, tool use, safety, and performance evaluation. This study maps and synthesizes design principles for procedural learning videos through a Scopus metadata-based systematic mapping review, with the selection process reported using PRISMA 2020. A search conducted on 15 January 2025 yielded 1,400 records; after 34 duplicates were removed, 1,366 records were screened and 50 articles were retained for final synthesis based on thematic relevance and conceptual contribution. Four clusters emerged: instructional video design and effectiveness; interactivity, flipped learning, and YouTube; VR/AR and practicum media; and TVET implementation readiness. The synthesis generated a 10-component framework integrating symptom orientation, competency objectives, segmented demonstration, visual cues, technical reasoning narration, occupational safety, diagnostic questions, guided practice, performance rubrics, and reflection-remediation. The contribution lies in extending multimedia-learning principles toward procedural cognition, diagnostic reasoning, skill transfer, and safety performance in automotive workshop learning.

References

Abd Majid, M. Z., Kasavan, S., & Siron, R. (2022). Bibliometric analysis and science mapping of global scientific publications on technical vocational education training (TVET). Library Hi Tech, 42(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2021-0485

Acevedo, P., Magana, A. J., Benes, B., & Mousas, C. (2024). A Systematic Review of Immersive Virtual Reality in STEM Education: Advantages and Disadvantages on Learning and User Experience. IEEE Access, 12, 189359–189386. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3489233

Agustian, D., Amartha, A., & Wardoyo, S. (2024). Tantangan Pendidikan Vokasional dalam Meningkatkan Penyerapan Lulusan SMK di Dunia Industri. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 7(3), 1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.7.3.2024.5016

Ahmad, S., Watrianthos, R., Samala, A., Muskhir, M., & Dogara, G. (2023). Project-based Learning in Vocational Education: A Bibliometric Approach. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2023.04.04

Alam, M. J., Reza, S. M. A., Ogawa, K., & Ahsan, A. H. M. (2024). Sustainable employment for vocational education and training graduates: The case of future skills matching in Bangladesh. International Journal of Training Research, 22(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2024.2308224

Aldossari, A. S. (2020). Vision 2030 and reducing the stigma of vocational and technical training among Saudi Arabian students. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 12(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-020-00089-6

Alemdag, E. (2022). Effects of instructor-present videos on learning, cognitive load, motivation, and social presence: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12713–12742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11154-w

Aliyyah, R. R., Amini, A., Subasman, I., & Herawati, E. S. B. (2021). UPAYA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR IPA MELALUI PENGGUNAAN MEDIA VIDEO PEMBELAJARAN. 12.

Asghar, M. Z., Afzaal, M. N., Iqbal, J., & Sadia, H. A. (2022). Analyzing an Appropriate Blend of Face-to-Face, Offline and Online Learning Approaches for the In-Service Vocational Teacher’s Training Program. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710668

Bai, C., Yang, J., & Tang, Y. (2022). Embedding self-explanation prompts to support learning via instructional video. Instructional Science, 50(5), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09587-4

Beege, M., Krieglstein, F., & Arnold, C. (2022). How instructors influence learning with instructional videos—The importance of professional appearance and communication. Computers & Education, 185, 104531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104531

Beege, M., Schroeder, N. L., Heidig, S., Rey, G. D., & Schneider, S. (2023). The instructor presence effect and its moderators in instructional video: A series of meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 41, 100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564

Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125

Chen, C.-H. (2020). AR videos as scaffolding to foster students’ learning achievements and motivation in EFL learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12902

Chinedu, C. C., Saleem, A., & Wan Muda, W. H. N. (2023). Teaching and Learning Approaches: Curriculum Framework for Sustainability Literacy for Technical and Vocational Teacher Training Programmes in Malaysia. Sustainability, 15(3), 2543. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032543

Deng, R., & Gao, Y. (2024). Effects of embedded questions in pre-class videos on learner perceptions, video engagement, and learning performance in flipped classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, 25(3), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231167098

Dressen-Hammouda, D., & Wigham, C. R. (2022). Evaluating multimodal literacy: Academic and professional interactions around student-produced instructional video tutorials. System, 105, 102727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102727

Elme, L., Jørgensen, M. L. M., Dandanell, G., Mottelson, A., & Makransky, G. (2022). Immersive virtual reality in STEM: Is IVR an effective learning medium and does adding self-explanation after a lesson improve learning outcomes? Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 1601–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10139-3

Expósito, A., Sánchez-Rivas, J., Gómez-Calero, M. P., & Pablo-Romero, M. P. (2020). Examining the use of instructional video clips for teaching macroeconomics. Computers & Education, 144, 103709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103709

Fan, Y., Zheng, H., Ebonite, R., De Asis, W., & Juanatas, R. (2024). Overview and developmental analysis of China’s technical and vocational education and training. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 7, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i1.2606

Fidan, M., & Debbag, M. (2023). Comparing the Effectiveness of Instructional Video Types: An In-Depth Analysis on Pre-Service Teachers for Online Learning. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(3), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041905

Fyfield, M. (2022). YouTube in the secondary classroom: How teachers use instructional videos in mainstream classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1980429

Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2021). Navigating four billion videos: Teacher search strategies and the YouTube algorithm. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1781890

Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2022). Improving instructional video design: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7296

Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239

Kuhlmann, S. L., Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., Hogan, K. A., Evans, M., Plumley, R., Gates, K., & Panter, A. (2023). How do students’ achievement goals relate to learning from well-designed instructional videos and subsequent exam performance? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, 102162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102162

Kuhlmann, S. L., Plumley, R., Evans, Z., Bernacki, M. L., Greene, J. A., Hogan, K. A., Berro, M., Gates, K., & Panter, A. (2024). Students’ active cognitive engagement with instructional videos predicts STEM learning. Computers & Education, 216, 105050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105050

Kuncoro, T., Ichwanto, M. A., & Muhammad, D. F. (2023). VR-Based Learning Media of Earthquake-Resistant Construction for Civil Engineering Students. Sustainability, 15(5), 4282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054282

Lawson, A. P., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Does the emotional stance of human and virtual instructors in instructional videos affect learning processes and outcomes? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 70, 102080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102080

Liao, C.-H., & Wu, J.-Y. (2023). Learning analytics on video-viewing engagement in a flipped statistics course: Relating external video-viewing patterns to internal motivational dynamics and performance. Computers & Education, 197, 104754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104754

Liu, R., Xu, X., Yang, H., Li, Z., & Huang, G. (2022). Impacts of Cues on Learning and Attention in Immersive 360-Degree Video: An Eye-Tracking Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792069

Lowenthal, P. R. (2022). Exploring student perceptions of asynchronous video in online courses. Distance Education, 43(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2088479

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-Based Principles for How to Design Effective Instructional Videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.03.007

Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6

Merkt, M., Lux, S., Hoogerheide, V., van Gog, T., & Schwan, S. (2020). A change of scenery: Does the setting of an instructional video affect learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000414

Mohd Dahlan, M., Halim, N., Kamarudin, N., & Ahmad, F. (2023). Exploring interactive video learning: Techniques, applications, and pedagogical insights. International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 10, 220–230. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.12.024

Mohd Jamil, M. R., Hasyim, A., Othman, M., Muqsith, A., Noh, N., & Kamal, M. (2023). Digital Pedagogy Policy in Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in Malaysia: Fuzzy Delphi Approach. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2023.15.02.001

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713

Osti, F., de Amicis, R., Sanchez, C. A., Tilt, A. B., Prather, E., & Liverani, A. (2021). A VR training system for learning and skills development for construction workers. Virtual Reality, 25(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00470-6

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Panev, I., Mikelic Preradovic, N., & Lauc, T. (2020). Investigating interactivity in instructional video tutorials for an undergraduate informatics course. Issues in Educational Research, 30, 203–223.

Perez-Ramirez, M., Arroyo-Figueroa, G., & Ayala, A. (2021). The use of a virtual reality training system to improve technical skill in the maintenance of live-line power distribution networks. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1587636

Petillion, R. J., & McNeil, W. S. (2020). Johnstone’s Triangle as a Pedagogical Framework for Flipped-Class Instructional Videos in Introductory Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(6), 1536–1542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01105

Polat, H. (2023). Instructors’ presence in instructional videos: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8537–8569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11532-4

Pulukuri, S., & Abrams, B. (2020). Incorporating an Online Interactive Video Platform to Optimize Active Learning and Improve Student Accountability through Educational Videos. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(12), 4505–4514. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00855

Putri, A. A. L., & Lestari, A. (2025). Analisis Kualitas Video Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Teori Multimedia Mayer. Sinergi : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(2), 1555–1573.

Sari, A., Dardjito, H., & Azizah, D. (2020). EFL Students’ Improvement through the Reflective YouTube Video Project. International Journal of Instruction, 13, 393–408. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13425a

Sari, R. C., Pranesti, A., Solikhatun, I., Nurbaiti, N., & Yuniarti, N. (2024). Cognitive overload in immersive virtual reality in education: More presence but less learnt? Education and Information Technologies, 29(10), 12887–12909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12379-z

Tarchi, C., Zaccoletti, S., & Mason, L. (2021). Learning from text, video, or subtitles: A comparative analysis. Computers & Education, 160, 104034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104034

Wang, J., Antonenko, P., & Dawson, K. (2020). Does visual attention to the instructor in online video affect learning and learner perceptions? An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 146, 103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103779

Wang, X., Liu, T., Wang, J., & Tian, J. (2022). Understanding Learner Continuance Intention: A Comparison of Live Video Learning, Pre-Recorded Video Learning and Hybrid Video Learning in COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 38(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1938389

Wannapiroon, P., Nilsook, P., Jitsupa, J., & Chaiyarak, S. (2022). Digital Competences of Vocational Instructors with Synchronous Online Learning in Next Normal Education. International Journal of Instruction, 15, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15117a

Xie, T., Li, Y., & Tang, Y. (2023). Effects of Using Immersive Virtual Reality for Science Education on Learning Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6), 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3263587

Yamada, S., & Otchia, C. S. (2020). Perception gaps on employable skills between technical and vocational education and training (TVET) teachers and students: The case of the garment sector in Ethiopia. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 11(1), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-08-2019-0105

Yoon, M., Lee, J., & Jo, I.-H. (2021). Video learning analytics: Investigating behavioral patterns and learner clusters in video-based online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100806

Yusop, S. R. M., Rasul, M. S., Mohamad Yasin, R., Hashim, H. U., & Jalaludin, N. A. (2022). An Assessment Approaches and Learning Outcomes in Technical and Vocational Education: A Systematic Review Using PRISMA. Sustainability, 14(9), 5225. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095225

Zheng, X., Ma, Y., Yue, T., & Yang, X. (2023). Effects of different types of cues and self-explanation prompts in instructional videos on deep learning: Evidence from multiple data analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(3), 807–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10188-2