Penerapan Pendekatan STML dengan Strategi Siklus Belajar Empiris-Induktif untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Literasi Sains-Teknologi Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v2i1.473Keywords:
STML, siklus belajar, empiris-induktif, hasil belajar, literasi sains teknologi, respon siswaAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa, (2) meningkatkan literasi sains teknologi (LST) siswa, dan (3) mendeskripsikan respon siswa terhadap penerapan pendekatan Sains Teknologi Masyarakat dan Lingkungan (STML) dengan strategi siklus belajar empiris-induktif dalam pembelajaran fisika pada materi rangkaian listrik dan hukum Ohm. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan kelas, yang dilaksanakan dalam 2 (dua) siklus. Subyek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X MAN 3 Lombok Tengah tahun pelajaran 2020/2021 yang berjumlah 45 siswa. Instrument penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa tes hasil belajar, tes literasi sains dan teknologi, dan angket respon. Data penelitian dianalisis secara deskriptif kuntitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan pendekatan STML dengan strategi siklus belajar empiris-induktif dapat meningkatkan (1) hasil belajar, (2) LST dan (3) respon posistif siswa berdasarkan tinjauan peningkataan siklus I dan siklus II. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pendekatan STML dengan strategi siklus belajar empiris-induktif dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar, LST, dan respon positif siswa dalam pembelajaran fisika pada materi rangkaian listrik dan hukum Ohm.
Application of STML Approach with Empirical-Inductive Learning Cycle Strategy to Improve Student's Learning Outcomes and Science-Technology Literacy
Abstract
This study aimed to (1) improve student learning outcomes, (2) improve students' science technology literacy (LST), and (3) describe student responses to the application of the Community and Environmental Science Technology (STML) approach with an empirical-inductive learning cycle strategy in learning physics on electrical circuit material and Ohm's law. This research is a classroom action research, which is carried out in 2 (two) cycles. The subjects of this study were students of class X MAN 3 Central Lombok in the academic year 2020/2021, totaling 45 students. The research instruments used in this study were learning outcomes tests, scientific and technological literacy tests, and response questionnaires. The research data were analyzed descriptively and quantitatively. The results showed that the application of the STML approach with an empirical-inductive learning cycle strategy could improve (1) learning outcomes, (2) LST and (3) students' positive responses based on a review of the improvement in cycle I and cycle II. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the STML approach with the empirical-inductive learning cycle strategy can improve student learning outcomes, LST, and positive responses of students in learning physics on electrical circuits and Ohm's law material.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, Z. (2019). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Pendekatan STML untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 2(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v2i1.432
Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2016). Comparison of Students’ Scientific Literacy in Integrated Science Learning Through Model of Guided Discovery and Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5786
Arikunto, S. (1999). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Chusni, M. M., Zakwandi, R., Hasanah, A., Malik, A., Ghazali, A. M., & Ubaidillah, M. (2018). Scientific Literacy: How is it Evolved to Pre-Service Physics Teacher? Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2781
Fathurrohman, M. A., & Astuti, R. K. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Fisika Dasar I Berbasis Literasi Sains. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 2(2), 163–171.
Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Kemendikbud.
Khoiriah, M., & Kholiq, A. (2019). Validitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berbantuan E-Book Literasi Sains Pada Materi Fluida Dinamis. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 9(1), 779–783.
Kurniawati, L., Aminah, N. S., & Marzuki, A. (2019). Assessing scientific literacy on optics among high school students in Kudus. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1170, 012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012038
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
Linder, A., Airey, J., Mayaba, N., & Webb, P. (2014). Fostering Disciplinary Literacy? South African Physics Lecturers’ Educational Responses to their Students’ Lack of Representational Competence. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2014.953294
Ni’mah, F. (2019). Research trends of scientific literacy in Indonesia: Where are we? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.20862
Nurhasanah, N., Jumadi, J., Herliandry, L. D., Zahra, M., & Suban, M. E. (2020). Perkembangan Penelitian Literasi Sains dalam Pembelajaran Fisika di Indonesia. EDUSAINS, 12(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i1.14148
Nurkancana, & Sunartana. (1992). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Usaha Nasional.
OCED. (2016). Country Note – Results from PISA 2015 [Report]. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf
Pahrudin, A., Irwandani, I., Triyana, E., Oktarisa, Y., & Anwar, C. (2019). The Analysis of Pre-Service Physics Teachers in Scientific Literacy: Focus on the Competence and Knowledge Aspects. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.15728
Pamungkas, Z. S., Aminah, N. S., & Nurosyid, F. (2018). Students Critical Thinking Skill in Solving Scientific Literacy using a Metacognitive Test Based on Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2909
Parno, Yuliati, L., & Munfaridah, N. (2018). The profile of high school students’ scientific literacy on fluid dynamics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012027
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 dengan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmpf.v9i1.31612
Rideng, I. M. (2000). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran IPA dengan Pendekatan Sains-Teknologi-Masyarakat terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SLTP. STKIP N Singaraja.
Sukaisih, R. (2004). Penerapan Pendekatan Sains-Teknologi-Masyarakat dan Lingkungan (STML) dengan Strategi Siklus Belajar Empiris-Induktif sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Literasi Sains-Teknologi Siswa Kelas IIIB2 Semester 1 SMPN 6 Singaraja Tahun Pelajaran 2004/2005. IKIP Negeri Singaraja.
Sukaisih, R. (2013). Penerapan Pendekatan Sains-Teknologi-Masyarakat dan Lingkungan (STML) sebagai upaya Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Rangkaian Listrik dan Hukum Ohm. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 1(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v1i2.1904
Sukaisih, R., & Muhali, M. (2014). Meningkatkan Kesadaran Metakognitif dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Penerapan Pembelajaran Problem Solving. Prisma Sains?: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 2(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v2i1.803
Wena, M. (2012). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Bumi Aksara.
Widiani, N. L. R., Suadnyana, I. N., & Manuaba, I. B. S. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran SETS Berbantuan Media Audio Visual terhadap Kompetensi Pengetahuan IPA Siswa Kelas V. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 5(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v5i2.10755
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 M. Muhali, Muhammad Asy'ari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
