Pengaruh Model Siklus Belajar Hipotesis-Deduktif terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v2i2.599Keywords:
siklus belajar, hipotesis-deduktif, hasil belajar, learning cycle, hypothetical-deductive, learning outcomesAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pengaruh model siklus belajar hipotesis-deduktif terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan pretest-posttest control group design. Sampel penelitian ini melibatkan 66 siswa di dua kelas pada Madrasah Aliyah Darul Mahmudien NW Lombok Tengah sebagai sampel. Kelompok eksperimen (29 siswa) dan kelompok control (37 siswa) dipilih menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling. Data hasil belajar siswa dianalisis sesara statistic menggunakan independent t-test dengan bantuan software IBM SPSS versi 23. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model siklus belajar hipotesis-deduktif berpengaruh signifikan (p < 0,05) terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa. Temuan tersebut didukung hasil skor rata-rata kelompok eksperimen (mean= 81,0345) yang lebih tinggi dari kelompok control (mean= 76,9730) sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa model siklus belajar hipotesis-deduktif berpengaruh signifikan terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa.
The Effect of Hypothetical-Deductive Learning Cycle Model on Mathematics Learning Outcomes of High School Students
Abstract
This study aims to describe the effect of the hypothetical-deductive learning cycle model on students' mathematics learning outcomes. This research is a quasi-experimental research with pretest-posttest control group design. The sample of this study involved 66 students in two classes at Madrasah Aliyah Darul Mahmudien NW Central Lombok as a sample. The experimental group (29 students) and the control group (37 students) were selected using cluster random sampling technique. Data on student learning outcomes were analyzed statistically using an independent t-test with the help of IBM SPSS version 23 software. The results showed that the hypothesis-deductive learning cycle model had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on students' mathematics learning outcomes. This finding is supported by the average score of the experimental group (mean = 81.0345) which is higher than the control group (mean = 76.9730) so it can be concluded that the hypothetical-deductive learning cycle model has a significant effect on students' mathematics learning outcomes.
Downloads
References
Dahar, R. W. (2003). Teori-teori belajar. Gelora Aksara Prima.
Dewi, R., Supriyanti, F. M. T., & Dwiyanti, G. (2016). Analisis penguasaan konsep larutan elektrolit-nonelektrolit siswa menggunakan siklus belajar hipotesis deduktif. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan), 1(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.30870/educhemia.v1i2.764
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Gunasih, N. L. M. A. (2011). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran siklus belajar hipotesis - deduktif dengan seting 5 e (engagement-eksplorasi-ekslpanasi-elaborasi-evaluasi) terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar fisika siswa (studi eksperimen di sma negeri 7 denp. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 1(2), Article 2. https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/246
Haerunnissa, N., Solfarina, S., & Langitasari, I. (2019). Pengaruh Siklus Belajar Hipotesis Deduktif pada Konsep Reaksi Redoks Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 5(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpk.v5i1.17783
Kemendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 54 Tahun 2013. Kemendikbud. https://akhmadsudrajat.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/01-b-salinan-lampiran-permendikbud-no-54-tahun-2013-ttg-skl.pdf
Kuswanti, Y., Setiawani, S., & Lestari, N. D. S. (2017). Analisis Soal Dalam Buku Siswa Matematika Kurikulum 2013 Untuk Sekolah Menengah Pertama Kelas VII Berdasarkan Dimensi Kognitif Trends International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Jurnal Edukasi, 4(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v4i3.6156
Lawson, A. E., & Karplus, R. (2002). The Learning Cycle. Dalam R. G. Fuller (Ed.), A Love of Discovery (hlm. 51–76). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0876-1_4
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., Stanco, G. M., International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, & Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (Ed.). (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. IEA, TIMSS & PIRLS, International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Muhali, M., & Asy’ari, M. (2021). Penerapan Pendekatan STML dengan Strategi Siklus Belajar Empiris-Induktif untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Literasi Sains-Teknologi Siswa. Empiricism Journal, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v2i1.473
Muslimin, M., Yoga, W., & Darmadi, W. (2019). Pengaruh Model Siklus Belajar Hipotetikal Deduktif terhadap Keterampilan Generik Sains Siswa Kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Balaesang pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 6(3), 40–44.
Nur, M. (2011). Modul Keterampilan-keterampilan Proses dan Hakikat Sains. PSMS Unesa.
Piaget, J. (1967). Six Psychological Studies. Random House.
Prastyo, H. (2020). Kemampuan Matematika Siswa Indonesia Berdasarkan TIMSS. Jurnal Padegogik, 3(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.35974/jpd.v3i2.2367
Ramadoan, N., & Sulisworo, D. (2018). Strategi berpikir hipotetikal deduktif dalam pengembangan keterampilan berpikir kritis pada pembelajaran fisika. Quantum: Seminar Nasional Fisika, Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 0, 351–357.
Salamah, D. P. (2020). Analisis kesalahan berdasarkan newman error analysis terhadap materi peluang kejadian majemuk ditinjau dari gender dan self confidence pada siswa kelas xii smk di Bandung Barat. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 3(4), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i4.p%p
Saputra, H. N. (2019). Analisis respon guru dan siswa terhadap penerapan model siklus belajar hipotesis deduktif dalam pembelajaran kimia. PEDAGOGIK: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(2), 278–299. https://doi.org/10.33650/pjp.v6i2.729
Sari, N. R., Hidayat, W., & Yuliani, A. (2019). Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas X SMA Pada Materi SPLTV Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v7i1.3776
Sriyanto. (2007). Startegi Sukses Menguasai Matematika. Indonesia Cerdas.
Sutama, S., Janah, N. N., & Novitasari, M. (2018). Faktor Stratejik Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa di Sekolah Menegah Pertama. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 29(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v29i2.5633
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Nachdr.). Harvard Univ. Press.
Wasonowati, R. R. T., Redjeki, T., & Ariani, S. R. D. (2014). Penerapan model problem based learning (pbl) pada pembelajaran hukum - hukum dasar kimia ditinjau dari aktivitas dan hasil belajar siswa kelas x ipa sma negeri 2 Surakarta tahun pelajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(3), 66–75.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Helmi Rahmawati, Moh. Supratman, Zema Yuliana Aulan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
