Katalog Miskonsepsi dalam Pembelajaran Ikatan Kimia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ej.v4i2.1729Keywords:
Miskonsepsi, Pembelajaran, Ikatan Kimia.Abstract
Kesulitan belajar pada konsep-konsep ikatan kimia dapat muncul dalam berbagai bentuk. Salah satu kesulitan yang umum terjadi adalah miskonsepsi, dimana siswa mempunyai konsep yang tidak sama dengan konsep para ilmuwan. Kesalahan konsep dalam pembelajaran ikatan kimia telah banyak dilaporkan, dan sebagian yang adalah bentuk yang berulang kali terjadi. Penelitian ini adalah review bentuk-bentuk miskonsepsi, sebagai upaya membuat katalog bentuk-bentuk miskonsepsi. Penelitian review ini mengikuti kerangka PRISMA. Paper artikel penelitian dikumpulkan melalui pencarian Google scholar. Kemudian, setelah dilakukan seleksi eligibilitas, sebanyak 103 artikel jurnal dianalisis dan dirangkum area dan bentuk miskonsepsi ikatan kimia yang dilaporkan. Beberapa miskonsepsi yang berkaitan dengan konsep-konsep ikatan ionik dan ikatan kovalen telah dirangkum dari penelitian terdahulu yang dilakukan dari tahun 2006 sampai 2003. Beberapa argumentasi dan pertimbangan yang mempengaruhi terjadinya miskonsepsi, seperti cara konsep ikatan kimia diajarkan, sumber belajar dan strategi pembelajaran telah dijelaskan dalam artikel ini. Beberapa saran dan rekomendasi untuk belajar dan pembelajaran selanjutnya yang berkaitan dengan konsep ikatan kimia telah didiskusikan dalam artikel ini.
Catalog of Misconceptions in Learning Chemical Bonds
Abstract
Learning difficulties on the concept of chemical bonding can arise in a variety of forms. One common difficulty is understanding complex chemical bonds, such as covalent, ionic, and metallic bonds, as well as the relationship between molecular structure and substance properties. This review research methods followed PRISMA framework. Research paper were collected through Google scholar. After selecting the eligibilty, 103 journal articles were analized for cataloging the area of students difficulties and misconceptions regard to chemical bonding subject matter. Some misconceptions related to ionic bonding and covalent bonding were summarized from previous research were conducted from 2006 to 2023. Some argumentations and considerations affected on students misconceptions such as the way the concept were taught, learning resources and learning strategies, were explained in this article. Some suggestion framework for further teaching and learning recommendation related to chemical bonding are discussed in this article.
Downloads
References
Analita, N. R. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Chemical Bonding Misconception with A Four-Tier Diagnostic Test.
Ardiansah. (2018). Colleges Students’ Misconception about Type of Bonding. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 05079.
Ardiansyah, A., Jahro, I. S., & Darmana, A. (2021). Identification of High School Students’ Misconceptions on Chemical Bonding With Three Tier Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 10(3).
Awan, A. S., & Khan, T. M. (2013). Investigating Pakistani Students’ alternative Ideas regarding the Concept of Chemical Bonding. Bulletin of Education and Research, 35(1), 17–29.
Awan, A. S., Iqbal, M. Z., Khan, T. M., Mahmood, T., & Mohsin, M. N. (2012). Pupils’ ideas in learning concept of the chemical bonding among Pakistani students. International Journal of Applied, 2(6).
Bergqvist, A., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2017b). The influence of textbooks on teachers’ knowledge of chemical bonding representations relative to students’ difficulties understanding. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1295934
Bergqvist, A., & Chang Rundgren, S.-N. (2017a). The influence of textbooks on teachers’ knowledge of chemical bonding representations relative to students’ difficulties understanding. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 215–237.
Bergqvist, A., Drechsler, M., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2016b). Upper Secondary Teachers’ Knowledge for Teaching Chemical Bonding Models. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1125034
Bergqvist, A., Drechsler, M., & Chang Rundgren, S.-N. (2016a). Upper secondary teachers’ knowledge for teaching chemical bonding models. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 298–318.
Bergqvist, A., Drechsler, M., De Jong, O., & Rundgren, S.-N. C. (2013). Representations of chemical bonding models in school textbooks–help or hindrance for understanding? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 589–606.
Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2001). Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held by upper secondary and tertiary students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 171–191.
Croft, M., & de Berg, K. (2014). From Common Sense Concepts to Scientifically Conditioned Concepts of Chemical Bonding: An Historical and Textbook Approach Designed to Address Learning and Teaching Issues at the Secondary School Level. Science and Education, 23(9), 1733–1761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9683-0
Dhindsa, H. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Prospective pedagogy for teaching chemical bonding for smart and sustainable learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 435–446.
Doymus, K. (2008). Teaching chemical bonding through jigsaw cooperative learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 47–57.
Erman, E. (2017). Factors contributing to students’ misconceptions in learning covalent bonds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 520–537.
Graulich, N., Lewis, S. E., Kahveci, A., Nyachwaya, J. M., & Lawrie, G. A. (2021). Writing a review article: What to do with my literature review. In Chemistry Education Research and Practice (Vol. 22, Issue 3, pp. 561–564). Royal Society of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1rp90006d
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade?12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611–628.
Gudyanga, E., & Madambi, T. (2014). Pedagogics of chemical bonding in Chemistry; perspectives and potential for progress: The case of Zimbabwe secondary education. International Journal of Secondary Education, 2(1), 11–19.
Hanson, R. (2017). Unearthing conceptions about types of chemical bonding through the use of tiered worksheets: A case study. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 8(2), 3112–3122.
Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 247–264.
Hunter, K. H., Rodriguez, J. M. G., & Becker, N. M. (2022). A Review of Research on the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Bonding. In Journal of Chemical Education (Vol. 99, Issue 7, pp. 2451–2464). American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00034
Jenkins, J. L., & Shoopman, B. T. (2019). Identifying Misconceptions That Limit Student Understanding of Molecular Orbital Diagrams. Science Education International, 30(3), 152–157.
Levy Nahum, T., Mamlok?Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Taber, K. S. (2010). Teaching and learning the concept of chemical bonding. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 179–207.
Luxford, C. J., & Bretz, S. L. (2014). Development of the bonding representations inventory to identify student misconceptions about covalent and ionic bonding representations. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(3), 312–320.
Majeed, S. (2023). An Exploration of Students’ Common Misconceptions in the Subject of Chemistry at Secondary Level. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(II). https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2023(4-II)25
Majeed, S., Ahmad, R., & Mazhar, S. (2023). An Exploration of Students’ Common Misconceptions in the Subject of Chemistry at Secondary Level. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(2), 265–272.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. In BMJ (Online) (Vol. 339, Issue 7716, pp. 332–336). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Nahum, T. L., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Ziva, B.-D. (2004). CAN FINAL EXAMINATIONS AMPLIFY STUDENTS’MISCONCEPTIONS IN CHEMISTRY? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 301–325.
Nahum, T. L., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Hofstein, A. (2013). Teaching and learning of the chemical bonding concept: Problems and some pedagogical issues and recommendations. In Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 373–390). Springer.
Nahum, T. L., Mamlok?Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Developing a new teaching approach for the chemical bonding concept aligned with current scientific and pedagogical knowledge. Science Education, 91(4), 579–603.
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992) Why some students don’t learn chemistry?, Journal of Chemical Education,69(3), 191–196.
Othman, J., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2008). An investigation into the relationship between students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter and their understanding of chemical bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1531–1550.
Ozmen, H. (2008). The influence of computer-assisted instruction on students’ conceptual understanding of chemical bonding and attitude toward chemistry: A case for Turkey. Computers & Education, 51(1), 423–438.
Peterson, R. F., Treagust, D. F., & Garnett, P. (1989). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade?11 and?12 students’ concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(4), 301–314.
Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Hertina, A. M. (2019). The Misconception Diagnosis on Ionic and Covalent Bonds Concepts with Three Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1477–1488.
Rohmah, R. S., Sholichah, N., Pratiwi, Y. N., & Analita, R. N. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Chemical Bonding Misconception with A Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. Vol, 2, 166–174.
Salah, H., & Dumon, A. (2014). Conceptual integration of covalent bond models by Algerian students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00041b
Salyani, R., Nurmaliah, C., & Mahidin, M. (2020). Application of the 5E learning cycle model to overcome misconception and increase student learning activities in learning chemical bonding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012102.
Sunyono, S., & Meristin, A. (2018). THE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION-BASED LEARNING (MRL) TO INCREASE STUDENTS’UNDERSTANDING OF CHEMICAL BONDING CONCEPTS. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 399–406.
Taber, K. S. (1997). Understanding Chemical Bonding: The development of A level students’ understanding of the concept of chemical bonding. University of Surrey (United Kingdom).
Taber, K. S. (2011). Models, molecules and misconceptions: a commentary on “secondary school students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding”. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(1), 3–18.
Taber, K. S. (2013). A common core to chemical conceptions: Learners’ conceptions of chemical stability, change and bonding. Concepts of Matter in Science Education, 391–418.
Thompson, B., Bunch, Z., & Popova, M. (2023). A Review of Research on the Quality and Use of Chemistry Textbooks. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2884–2895. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00385
Tsaparlis, G., Pappa, E. T., & Byers, B. (2018). Teaching and learning chemical bonding: research-based evidence for misconceptions and conceptual difficulties experienced by students in upper secondary schools and the effect of an enriched text. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(4), 1253–1269.
Unal, S., Çal?k, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2006). A review of chemical bonding studies: needs, aims, methods of exploring students’ conceptions, general knowledge claims and students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(2), 141–172.
Venkataraman, B. (2017). Emphasizing the significance of electrostatic interactions in chemical bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(3), 296–303.
Vladusic, R., Bucat, R. B., & Ozic, M. (2023). Understanding covalent bonding–a scan across the Croatian education system. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 108–131.
Vrabec, M., & Proks?a, M. (2016). Identifying misconceptions related to chemical bonding concepts in the Slovak school system using the bonding representations inventory as a diagnostic tool. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(8), 1364–1370.
Yayon, M., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Fortus, D. (2012). Characterizing and representing student’s conceptual knowledge of chemical bonding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(3), 248–267.
Zohar, A. R., & Levy, S. T. (2019). Students’ reasoning about chemical bonding: The lacuna of repulsion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 881–904.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hendrawani Hendrawani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
