Dinamika Keberlanjutan Program Rehabilitasi Rumah: Perspektif Ganda Penerima Manfaat dan Pelaksana di Sumbawa Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/s0ycje94Keywords:
Keberlanjutan Program, Rehabilitasi Rumah, Pasca-Bencana, Kesenjangan PersepsiAbstract
Program rehabilitasi rumah pasca-bencana merupakan intervensi krusial, namun evaluasinya seringkali terbatas pada output fisik dan mengabaikan dinamika keberlanjutan jangka panjang. Pendekatan teknokratis ini kerap gagal menangkap kesenjangan persepsi antara tujuan manajerial pelaksana program dengan realitas yang dialami penerima manfaat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dinamika keberlanjutan program RR di Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat dengan membandingkan secara sistematis kedua perspektif tersebut. Menggunakan metode kualitatif studi kasus, data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan 5 pelaksana program dan 10 penerima manfaat, didukung oleh observasi partisipatoris. Temuan menunjukkan adanya keselarasan pada keberhasilan fisik bangunan, namun mengungkap tiga kesenjangan fundamental pada: (1) makna kualitas (standar teknis vs. kenyamanan fungsional), (2) keberlanjutan ekonomi (visi pemberdayaan vs. realitas beban perawatan), dan (3) makna partisipasi (formalistik vs. substantif). Kesenjangan ini berakar pada perbedaan fokus: pelaksana berorientasi pada output, sementara penerima manfaat berorientasi pada outcome. Simpulan menegaskan bahwa keberlanjutan yang holistik menuntut pergeseran dari model intervensi teknis menuju kemitraan transformasional yang secara aktif menjembatani kesenjangan persepsi melalui dialog dan partisipasi yang substantif. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoretis dengan memperluas diskursus evaluasi pasca-bencana dari sekadar metrik teknis menuju perspektif sosio-psikologis, menempatkan persepsi subjektif penerima manfaat sebagai indikator keberhasilan yang setara dengan standar struktural.
Sustainability Dynamics of a Housing Rehabilitation Program: A Dual Perspective Analysis from West Sumbawa
Abstract
Post-disaster housing rehabilitation (RR) programs are crucial interventions, yet their evaluations are often limited to physical outputs, neglecting long-term sustainability dynamics. This technocratic approach frequently fails to capture the perception gaps between the managerial objectives of program implementers and the lived realities of beneficiaries. This study aims to analyze the sustainability dynamics of an RR program in West Sumbawa Regency by systematically comparing these two perspectives. Employing a qualitative case study methodology, data were collected through in-depth interviews with 5 program implementers and 10 beneficiaries, supported by participant observation. Findings indicate a consensus on the physical success of the buildings but reveal three fundamental perception gaps concerning: (1) the meaning of quality (technical standards vs. functional comfort), (2) economic sustainability (empowerment vision vs. the reality of maintenance burdens), and (3) the meaning of participation (formalistic vs. substantive). These gaps are rooted in a core difference in focus: implementers are output-oriented, whereas beneficiaries are outcome-oriented. The study concludes that holistic sustainability requires a shift from a technical intervention model to a transformational partnership that actively bridges these perception gaps through dialogue and substantive participation. This study makes a theoretical contribution by expanding the discourse on post-disaster evaluation from mere technical metrics to a socio-psychological perspective, positioning the subjective perceptions of beneficiaries as success indicators equivalent to structural standards.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, I. and Parrack, C. (2022). Shelter Self-Recovery: The Experience of Vanuatu. Architecture, 2(2), 434-445. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2020024
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
Carrasco, S. and O’Brien, D. (2022). Incremental Pathways of Post-Disaster Housing Self-Recovery in Villa Verde, Chile. Architecture, 2(3), 544-561. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2030030
Crawford, G. and Morrison, C. (2021). Community led reconstruction, social inclusion and participation in post earthquake Nepal. Development Policy Review, 39(4), 548-568. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12512
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Ghannad, P., Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2020). Feasibility and Implications of the Modular Construction Approach for Rapid Post-Disaster Recovery. International Journal of Industrialized Construction, 1(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.29173/ijic220
Hidayati, Z., & Noviana, M. (2024). Post landslides recovery: Resilience of community and local construction. EMARA: Indonesian Journal of Architecture, 9(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.29080/eija.v9i2.1470
Jha, A. K., Barenstein, J. D., Phelps, P. M., Pittet, D., & Sena, S. (2010). Safer homes, stronger communities: A handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters. World Bank Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Muller, C. and ElZomor, M. (2024). Addressing Post-Disaster Challenges and Fostering Social Mobility through Origami Infrastructure and Construction Trade Education. Sustainability, 16(8), 3415. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083415
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Putra, A. D., & Setiawan, B. (2023). Peran partisipasi masyarakat dalam keberlanjutan jangka panjang program rehabilitasi rumah: Studi kasus di Lombok. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 19(2), 112=128.
Rahmayanti, K. P., & Rukmana, D. (2024). Scoping review of the depth of participation and barriers to community participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 104, 104375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104375
Rama, F. and Qadriina, H. (2024). Evaluasi pelaksanaan rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi: Konsep dan metode teknis monitoring. Information, Communication, and Disaster, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.61511/icd.v1i1.2024.607
Sari, L. P., & Widodo, A. (2022). Kesenjangan perspektif: Perbandingan persepsi keberhasilan program rekonstruksi rumah antara pemerintah dan penerima manfaat. Jurnal Sosiologi Indonesia, 25(1), 45–60.
Shahzad, W., Rajakannu, G., & Ghalenoei, N. (2022). Potential of Modular Offsite Construction for Emergency Situations: A New Zealand Study. Buildings, 12(11), 1970. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111970
UN-Habitat. (2022). People’s process in post-disaster recovery: A guidebook for community-led housing reconstruction. UN-Habitat.
Wu, H. (2021). When Housing and Communities Were Delivered: A Case Study of Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Rural Reconstruction and Recovery. Sustainability, 13(14), 7629. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147629
Wulandari, S. R., & Winarsih, W. (2022). Upaya Peningkatan Pengetahuan Ibu melalui Penyuluhan dan Pemeriksaan Tumbuh Kembang pada Balita. Jurnal Kolaborasi, 1(2), 45–52.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syaiful Arief, Umar Umar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Empiricism Journal agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in Empiricism Journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
