Hedging in Forensic Discourse: A Case Study on Noida Double Murder Interview
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ijlic.v2i3.2212Keywords:
Forensic Discourse, interview, hedging strategies, Noida Double Murder Case, cooperative principleAbstract
This paper delves into the intricacies of forensic discourse, focusing on linguistic hedging strategies in the context of the Noida Double Murder Case. Positioned at the intersection of linguistics, law, and crime, forensic discourse analysis provides a lens to examine language in legal settings. The paper centres on the 2008 Noida Murder Case, specifically analysing the communication strategies employed by Rajesh and Nupur Talwar during an interview. The paper aims to unravel the linguistic nuances within the interview setting by utilising Taweel et al.’s Hedging Strategi model, grounded by Grice's Cooperative Principle. This paper used a qualitative analysis to decodes linguistic manoeuvres, focusing on hedging strategies. The data were taken from an in-depth interview to obtain empirical information and undergo two stages of analysis identification of conventional maxims and examination of hedging markers and strategies. The analysis reveals intentional deviations from communicative norms, exposing three prominent hedging strategies: Avoidance, Question-to-Question, and Self-Protection. These strategies serve to deflect scrutiny, shape perceptions, and navigate the delicate balance of legal discourse. This paper contributes to forensic linguistics by uncovering the role of hedging strategies in the Noida Double Murder Case. By applying theoretical frameworks to case-specific discourse, the paper enhances our understanding of linguistic dynamics in high-stakes legal interviews, emphasising their significance in navigating complex legal communication.
Downloads
References
Aijmer, K., & Simon-Vandenbergen, A. M. (2020). Pragmatics of Modality in English. De Gruyter Mouton.
Azmi, N. A. A., Hamzah, Z. A. Z., & Azmi, M. I. A. (2021). Bahasa Lindung Nilai dalam Bukti Perundangan Niat Jenayah: Satu Analisis Pragmatik. Jurnal Bahasa, 21(1), 89-104.
BBC News. (2017, October 12). Aarushi Talwar murder: Parents Rajesh and Nupur cleared on appeal. BBC News. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from BBC News Website: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-41591524.
Blakemore, D. (2022). Linguistic Style and Persuasion in Legal Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Chaer A. And Agustina L. (2014). Sociolinguistic: Perkenalan Awal. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Chauhan, N. (2012, July 25). Aarushi Talwar murder case: Necks slit just before death. The Times of India. Retrieved from The Times of India website: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/aarushi-talwar-murder-case-necks-slit-just-before-death/articleshow/15133398.cms
Correa, M. (2013). Forensic linguistics: An overview of the intersection and interaction of language and law. Kalb? Studijos, (23), 5-13.
Coulthard, M. (2005). Some forensic applicationsof descriptive linguistics. Veredas-Revista de Estudos Linguísticos, 9(1 e 2).
Coulthard, M. & Johnson, A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research designs. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed). Sage.
Davies, B. L. (2007). Grice's cooperative principle: meaning and rationality. Journal of pragmatics, 39(12), 2308-2331.
Dewa, K. (2017). The Flouting and Hedging of Cooperative Principles by The Australian Witness in Jessica’s Murder Trial (A Discourse Analysis Approach) (Thesis). Hasanuddin University: Makassar.Eble. (1988). Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching. Washington: National Education Association.
Dumas, B. K. (2018). Legal Language: Spoken and Written Discourse. Wiley-Blackwell.
Gales, T. (2015). Identifying Uncertainty in Forensic Linguistic Analysis. Language & Law: International Journal of Language & Law.
Gibbons, J. P. (2014). Language and the Law. Routledge.
Goundar, S. (2012). Research methodology and research method. Victoria University of Wellington.
Gribanova, T. I., & Gaidukova, T. M. (2019). Hedging in different types of discourse. Training, Language and Culture, 3(2), 85-99.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Brill.
Hartini, L. (2014). Penerapan Fonetik Akustik dan Teori Grice pada Rekaman Penyadapan Telepon sebagai Alat Bukti Hukum: Kajian Linguistik Forensik Terhadap Percakapan Antara Artalyta Suryani dengan Jaksa urip Tri Gunawan. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 23(2), 223-240.
Hoey, E. M., & Kendrick, K. H. (2017). Conversation analysis. Research methods in psycholinguistics: A practical guide, 151-173.
Hutchby, I. (2017). Hybridisation, personalisation, and tribuneship in the political interview. Journalism, 18(1), 101-118.
Jharotia, A. K., & Singh, S. (2016). Use of Research Methodology in Research: An Overview. International Journal of Social Science, Journalism & Mass Communication, 2(2), 44–51.
Kamarul Azmi Jasmi. (2012). Metodologi pengumpulan data dalam penyelidikan kualitatitif. Kursus Penyelidikan Kualitatif Siri, 1(2012), 28-29.
Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2019). Inside the emergency service call-center: Reviewing thirty years of language and social interaction research. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 227-240.
Marco Margaritoff. (2023, January 11). The Full Story of Aarushi Talwar and The Noida Double Murder. All That’s Interesting. Retrieved January 11, 2023, from All That Interesting Website: https://allthatsinteresting.com/aarushi-talwar.
Mathers, N. J., Fox, N. J., & Hunn, A. (1998). Surveys and questionnaires (Vol. 1998). NHS Executive, Trent.
Milenkovi?, B. (2021). Detecting deception through hedging in Forensic analysis of written statements’’. Srpski jezik: studije srpske i slovenske, broj, 26, 163-180.
Nakane, I. (2019). Communication in Legal Contexts. Bloomsbury.
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language teaching research, 19(2), 129-132.
NDTV News Desk. (2017, October 12). Aarushi Talwar-Hemraj Murder: A Timeline of 2008 Double-Murder Case in Noida. NDTV.com. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from NDTV News Desk: https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/aarushi-talwar-hemraj-double-murder-case-timeline-542359
Oishi, E. (2006). Austin’s speech act theory and the speech situation. Esercizi Filosofici, 1(2006), 1-14.
Rajasekar, D., & Verma, R. (2013). Research methodology. Archers & Elevators Publishing House.
Rosanti, Elfira Dwi, and Alan Jaelani. (2016). The Use of Lexical Hedges in Spoken Language by Female and Male Students. Electronic Journals of UIKA Bogor 2(1). 29–39.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1997). I Think that Perhaps You Should: A Study of Hedges in Written Scientific Discourse. The Journal of Tesol-France.127-143.
Sharan, A. (2011, January 3). CBI hits dead end, closes Aarushi double murder case. Hindustan Times. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from Hindustan Times website: https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi/cbi-hits-dead-end-closes-aarushi-double-murder-case/story-khTB6StY4CcEcGv5903P0J.html
Taweel, A. Q., Saidat, E. M., Rafayah, H. A., & Saidat, A. M. (2011). Hedging in Political Discourse. Linguistics Journal, 5(1).
The Indian Express. (2017, October 13). What is the Aarushi Talwar murder case? The Indian Express. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from The Indian Express website: https://indianexpress.com/article/what-is/what-is-the-aarushi-talwar-murder-case-allahabad-high-court-hemraj-rajesh-talwar-nupur-talwar-4886203/
Tiersma, P. & Solan, L. (2005). Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Waskita, D. (2014). Transitivity in Telephone Conversation in a Bribery Case in Indonesia: a Forensic Linguistic Study. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 13(2), 91-100
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elmy Maswandi, Badriyah Yusof
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the International Journal of Linguistics and Indigenous Culture (IJLIC) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in International Journal of Linguistics and Indigenous Culture (IJLIC), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
