A Critical Discourse Analysis of CNBC Indonesia and CNN Indonesia on Russia’s Invasions of Ukraine: A Socio-Cultural Dimension

Authors

  • Alamsyah Alamsyah Mulawarman University
  • Awang Azman Awang Pawi University of Malaya
  • Wilma Prafitri Mulawarman University
  • Effendi Limbong Mulawarman University
  • Lalu Nurul Yaqin Universiti Brunei Darussalam
  • Muhammad Alim Akbar Nasir Mulawarman University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/ijlic.v3i1.2561

Keywords:

Mass Media, CNBC News Indonesia, CNN News Indonesia, Military Power, Sociocultural, Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract

This study aims to critically examine how CNBC News and CNN News Indonesia portrayed Russia's military actions in Ukraine through the lens of Fairclough's socio-cultural dimension of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), specifically focusing on political, economic, and cultural perspectives. Using a qualitative methodology, the analysis of selected articles from both media outlets between February and August 2022 revealed that both media outlets propagated justifications for Russia’s military actions, citing geopolitical and national security concerns. For instance, the media described Russia’s actions as defensive responses to NATO's affiliations with the United States and perceived economic threats related to food and energy security. However, the analysis also uncovered differences in framing economic impacts. CNN News Indonesia highlighted immediate humanitarian and economic crises, whereas CNBC News emphasized long-term global economic implications. This research underscores the media’s influential role in shaping public perceptions of geopolitical conflicts in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alyukov, M. (2022). Making sense of the news in an authoritarian regime: Russian television viewers’ reception of the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Europe-Asia Studies, 74(3), 337-359. https://doi.org/[DOI jika tersedia]

Alyukov, M., Kunilovskaya, M., & Semenov, A. (2023). Wartime Media Monitor (WarMM-2022): A study of information manipulation on Russian social media during the Russia-Ukraine War. In Proceedings of the 7th Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature (pp. 152-161). https://doi.org/[DOI jika tersedia]

Amaglobeli, G. (2016). Ideological-moral grounds of Georgian political discourse in the context of the Framing Theory. VII International Conference in American Studies, 30-38. Akaki Tsereteli State University.

Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/[DOI jika tersedia]

Ammar, A. A., & Rizal, R. A. (2023). Value-belief communication in social media: An analysis of the influencers' effect on TikTok. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 429-444. https://doi.org/[DOI jika tersedia]

Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-dasar ilmu politik (Basics of political science). PT Gramedia Pustaka.

Bisri, M. H. H., Subrata, I. D., Maulana, M. I., & Rasyid, Y. R. (2022). Analisis framing pemberitaan konflik Rusia dan Ukraina di CNN dan CNBC Indonesia. Perspektif Komunikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik dan Komunikasi Bisnis, 6(2), 247-259.

Diacona?u, D. E., Mehdian, S. M., & Stoica, O. (2023). The reaction of financial markets to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine: Evidence from gold, oil, bitcoin, and major stock markets. Applied Economics Letters, 30(19), 2792-2796. https://doi.org/[DOI jika tersedia]

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 9-20). Routledge.

Islam, S. S., & Moten, A. R. (2004). Political science: A primer. Cengage Learning Asia.

Kwei, Q. F. (2022). A comparison of online news media framing of the 2022 Russia-Ukraine conflict in Ukraine, Russia, the US & China.

Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255-256.

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2023). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Sage.

Melnyk, O. (2019). From the “Russian Spring” to the armed insurrection: Russia, Ukraine and political communities in the Donbas and Southern Ukraine. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 47(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/[DOI jika tersedia]

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Moses, J. M., Wilson, F., & Umar, B. N. (2023). Media framing of the Russia-Ukraine War by TASS and Ukrinform during the first month of the invasion. Current Trends in Mass Communication, 2(1), 56-66.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman.

Shi, R. (2023). A critical discourse analysis of intergroup interpretations and representations of ideologies and national identities in Sino-US news reports of the Russia-Ukraine affair. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022).

Shah, S. N. A., Majeed, G., Ali, R. A., & Hussain, T. (2022). Russia-Ukraine crisis and its impact on South Asia. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 5(2), 141-148.

Simons, G. (2022). “Inevitable” and “imminent” invasions: The logic behind Western media war stories. Journal of International Analytics, 13(2), 43-58. https://doi.org/[DOI jika tersedia]

Suhana, B. S., & Shahrul, N. S. (2023). Does Malaysian media truly exhibit bias? An analysis of Malaysian online news portals' coverage of the 15th general election. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(4), 404-423.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-29

How to Cite

Alamsyah, A., Awang Pawi, A. A., Prafitri, W., Limbong, E., Yaqin, L. N., & Nasir, M. A. A. (2025). A Critical Discourse Analysis of CNBC Indonesia and CNN Indonesia on Russia’s Invasions of Ukraine: A Socio-Cultural Dimension. International Journal of Linguistics and Indigenous Culture, 3(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijlic.v3i1.2561

Issue

Section

Articles