Generative AI in Translation: Trust, Transformation, and Pedagogical Integration in the Post-LLM Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/ijlic.v4i1.4676Keywords:
Generative AI, Large Language Models, Translator Trust, Machine Translation, Translator EducationAbstract
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) like Catgut has sparked both excitement and anxiety in the translation field. This literature review critically examines how generative AI is reshaping professional translation and translator education in the post-LLM era. Early studies showed that ChatGPT could produce translations between major languages with quality on par with neural machine translation, fueling hopes for productivity gains. However, trust in generative AI among translators remains limited. Surveys indicate that practitioners adopt tools like ChatGPT cautiously, primarily for ancillary tasks such as summarisation or drafting ideas. Key concerns, including data privacy, confidentiality, output accuracy, and the threat of job displacement, undermine translators’ trust in AI systems. We situate these concerns within technology acceptance models (TAM2) and AI trust frameworks, highlighting how perceived usefulness, reliability, and transparency shape adoption. At the same time, generative AI is transforming translation workflows: translators’ roles are evolving toward post-editing and quality control, raising questions of professional identity and autonomy. In translator education, recent experiments integrating ChatGPT show improved student performance and confidence, provided that pedagogical approaches emphasise critical AI literacy and post-editing skills. This review synthesises theoretical and empirical insights from 2023 to 2025 to present a balanced perspective on generative AI in translation. We argue that a human-centric integration of GenAI, one that builds translator trust, addresses ethical/legal risks, and nurtures new competencies, will be essential for harnessing these technologies’ benefits without undermining professional standards.
References
Andrade Preciado, J. S., & González Vallejo, R. (2024). Integrating ChatGPT and Generative IA apps in Specialised Text Translation and Post-Editing: An Exploratory Study. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024624
Andrade Preciado, J. S., & González Vallejo, R. (2025). Self-Efficacy and Perception in the Use of GAI Tools in the Translation Classroom. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025526
Cabrero-Daniel, B., & Sanagustín Cabrero, A. (2023). Perceived trustworthiness of natural language generators. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems, 1–9.
Gasaymeh, A., Abu Qbeita, A., Al-Mohtadi, R., & Beirat, M. (2025). Exploring education students’ use of ChatGPT for academic and personal purposes: insights from a developing country context. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1580310
Hubbard, P., & Schulze, M. (2025). AI and the Future of Language Teaching: Motivating Sustained Integrated Professional Development. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.378304
Isabel, M., Ginel, R., & Moorkens, J. (2025). Translators ’ trust and distrust in the times of GenAI. Translation Studies, 18(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2025.2507594
Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. (2024). Exploring professional translators’ attitudes towards control and autonomy in the human-centred AI era: quantitative results from a survey study. Revista Tradumatica, 22, 276–301. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.400
Leiter, C., Lertvittayakumjorn, P., Fomicheva, M., Zhao, W., Gao, Y., & Eger, S. (2024). Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105018907000&partnerID=40&md5=bad07f0879a6c90d5baca4c804c578c0
Lockey, S., Gillespie, N., Holm, D., & Someh, I. A. (2021). A review of trust in artificial intelligence: Challenges, vulnerabilities and future directions.
Rivas Ginel, M. I., & Moorkens, J. (2025). Translators’ trust and distrust in the times of GenAI. Translation Studies, 18(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2025.2507594
Tavares, C., Oliveira, L., Duarte, P., & da Silva, M. M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: A Blessing or a Threat for Language Service Providers in Portugal. Informatics, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10040081
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Wang, Y. (2024). Cognitive and sociocultural dynamics of self-regulated use of machine translation and generative AI tools in academic EFL writing. System, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103505
Webb, R., Yuksel, D., & Dikilitaş, K. (2026). Generative AI in English-medium instruction: Perceptions, usage, and impact on academic performance and language proficiency. System, 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2026.103973
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lalu Nurul Yaqin, Isma Noornisa Ismail

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the International Journal of Linguistics and Indigenous Culture (IJLIC) agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in International Journal of Linguistics and Indigenous Culture (IJLIC), copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











