Generative AI in Translation: Trust, Transformation, and Pedagogical Integration in the Post-LLM Era

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/ijlic.v4i1.4676

Keywords:

Generative AI, Large Language Models, Translator Trust, Machine Translation, Translator Education

Abstract

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) like Catgut has sparked both excitement and anxiety in the translation field. This literature review critically examines how generative AI is reshaping professional translation and translator education in the post-LLM era. Early studies showed that ChatGPT could produce translations between major languages with quality on par with neural machine translation, fueling hopes for productivity gains. However, trust in generative AI among translators remains limited. Surveys indicate that practitioners adopt tools like ChatGPT cautiously, primarily for ancillary tasks such as summarisation or drafting ideas. Key concerns, including data privacy, confidentiality, output accuracy, and the threat of job displacement, undermine translators’ trust in AI systems. We situate these concerns within technology acceptance models (TAM2) and AI trust frameworks, highlighting how perceived usefulness, reliability, and transparency shape adoption. At the same time, generative AI is transforming translation workflows: translators’ roles are evolving toward post-editing and quality control, raising questions of professional identity and autonomy. In translator education, recent experiments integrating ChatGPT show improved student performance and confidence, provided that pedagogical approaches emphasise critical AI literacy and post-editing skills. This review synthesises theoretical and empirical insights from 2023 to 2025 to present a balanced perspective on generative AI in translation. We argue that a human-centric integration of GenAI, one that builds translator trust, addresses ethical/legal risks, and nurtures new competencies, will be essential for harnessing these technologies’ benefits without undermining professional standards.

Author Biography

  • Lalu Nurul Yaqin, Universiti Brunei Darussalam

    Dr Lalu Nurul Yaqin is an Assistant Professor with the Malay Language and Linguistics programme (Bahasa Melayu & Linguistik) at the Faculty of Art and Social Sciences of Universiti Brunei Darussalam.

References

Andrade Preciado, J. S., & González Vallejo, R. (2024). Integrating ChatGPT and Generative IA apps in Specialised Text Translation and Post-Editing: An Exploratory Study. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 3. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2024624

Andrade Preciado, J. S., & González Vallejo, R. (2025). Self-Efficacy and Perception in the Use of GAI Tools in the Translation Classroom. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025526

Cabrero-Daniel, B., & Sanagustín Cabrero, A. (2023). Perceived trustworthiness of natural language generators. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems, 1–9.

Gasaymeh, A., Abu Qbeita, A., Al-Mohtadi, R., & Beirat, M. (2025). Exploring education students’ use of ChatGPT for academic and personal purposes: insights from a developing country context. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1580310

Hubbard, P., & Schulze, M. (2025). AI and the Future of Language Teaching: Motivating Sustained Integrated Professional Development. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.378304

Isabel, M., Ginel, R., & Moorkens, J. (2025). Translators ’ trust and distrust in the times of GenAI. Translation Studies, 18(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2025.2507594

Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. (2024). Exploring professional translators’ attitudes towards control and autonomy in the human-centred AI era: quantitative results from a survey study. Revista Tradumatica, 22, 276–301. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.400

Leiter, C., Lertvittayakumjorn, P., Fomicheva, M., Zhao, W., Gao, Y., & Eger, S. (2024). Towards Explainable Evaluation Metrics for Machine Translation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105018907000&partnerID=40&md5=bad07f0879a6c90d5baca4c804c578c0

Lockey, S., Gillespie, N., Holm, D., & Someh, I. A. (2021). A review of trust in artificial intelligence: Challenges, vulnerabilities and future directions.

Rivas Ginel, M. I., & Moorkens, J. (2025). Translators’ trust and distrust in the times of GenAI. Translation Studies, 18(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2025.2507594

Tavares, C., Oliveira, L., Duarte, P., & da Silva, M. M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: A Blessing or a Threat for Language Service Providers in Portugal. Informatics, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10040081

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

Wang, Y. (2024). Cognitive and sociocultural dynamics of self-regulated use of machine translation and generative AI tools in academic EFL writing. System, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103505

Webb, R., Yuksel, D., & Dikilitaş, K. (2026). Generative AI in English-medium instruction: Perceptions, usage, and impact on academic performance and language proficiency. System, 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2026.103973

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yaqin, L. N., & Ismail, I. N. (2026). Generative AI in Translation: Trust, Transformation, and Pedagogical Integration in the Post-LLM Era. International Journal of Linguistics and Indigenous Culture, 4(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.36312/ijlic.v4i1.4676