Understanding Students’ Experiences with Project-Based Assessment across Educational Levels and Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/7bxak004Keywords:
Project-based assessment, Students’ experiences, Assessment practices, Educational levelsAbstract
Project-based assessment (PBA) is often highlighted as a more authentic, engaging, practical, and student-centered approach compared to traditional exams. However, despite its growing use, there is limited and unified understanding of how students actually experience PBA across different educational levels and learning contexts. This gap in the literature is crucial, as student experiences are central to determining the effectiveness and inclusiveness of assessment practices in diverse classroom settings. It is crucial to understand how students experience PBA to ensure that this assessment approach fulfills its potential of meaningful, equitable, and effective learning. This article aims to systematically review empirical studies that explore students’ experiences with PBA, focusing on how these experiences vary across primary, secondary, and tertiary education as well as cultural and institutional contexts. The study is grounded in qualitative data drawn from published research articles, analyzed using thematic synthesis under the PRISMA framework. Inclusion criteria targeted peer-reviewed studies that foreground student voices and were published within the last 10 years. Findings indicate a combination of positive experiences, such as increased engagement, collaboration, and real-world skill development, alongside persistent challenges, including perceived workload imbalance and unclear assessment criteria. The review underscores the significance of adapting PBA to specific contexts and advises that future research systematically include student perspectives to refine assessment methods better and promote fairness. Implications of these findings for practice for educators and policy makers are that more nuanced and responsive assessment strategies have the potential to improve inclusiveness and instruction. Future research should also look into how school support, teacher support, and cultural contexts influence the efficacy of PBA interventions.
Downloads
References
Barge, S., & Universitet, A. (2010). Principles of problem and project based learning: The Aalborg PBL model. Aalborg University.
Condliffe, B. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review (Working Paper). MDRC.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dutta, S., He, M., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2022). Problem-based learning as an assessment: Enhancing students’ connective learning and constructive learning. Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 10(6), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v10i6.22.124
Dutta, S., Zhang, Y., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2023). Enhancing students’ engagement and learning through peer assessment in group projects. Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 11(6), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.33495/jerr_v11i6.23.120
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International journal of educational research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Hassanien, A. (2006). Student Experience of Group Work and Group Assessment in Higher Education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 6(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1300/J172v06n01_02
Hidayati, A. E. N., & Widiati, U. (2019). Fostering students’ writing ability through project based learning approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 7(4), 140-149.
Hidayati, D. (2023). Assessment of project-based learning: Evaluating its impact on students' writing proficiency and academic outcomes. English Language and Literature in Education Journal, 1(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.63011/ep6nnx37
Hussein, B. (2021). Addressing Collaboration Challenges in Project-Based Learning: The Student’s Perspective. Education Sciences, 11(8), 434. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080434
Izzah, N & Diana, L. (2021). Beyond the implementation of project-based assessment in ELT: Benefits, challenges, and teachers' strategies. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 8(2), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v8i2.18208
Izzah, N. (2021). Exploring TESOL Teachers' Perceptions of Project-Based Assessment in ELT Classroom. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.16284
Kalabzov, M. (2015). The application of project based learning in the English classrooms. University of West Bohemia.
Matilainen, R., Nuora, P., & Valto, P. (2021). Student experiences of project-based learning in an analytical chemistry laboratory course in higher education. Chemistry Teacher International, 3(3), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2020-0032
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Assessment Guidelines. Jakarta: Indonesian Ministry of Education and Culture.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Mutanga, M. B. (2024). Students’ Perspectives and Experiences in Project-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study. Trends in Higher Education, 3(4), 903-911. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu3040052
Noor, A. H., & Nurhayati, S. (2023). Project-Based Learning Implementation in a Participative Planning Course: Strategies, Outcomes, and Challenges. CAHAYA PENDIDIKAN, 9(2), 164-172. https://doi.org/10.33373/chypend.v9i2.5660
O’Connor, A., Cantillon, P., McGarr, O., & McCurtin, A. (2017). Navigating the system: Physiotherapy student perceptions of performance-based assessment. Medical Teacher, 40(9), 928–933. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1416071
Oduro, F., Muganga, A., Parker, D., & Sang, G. (2024). Students’ perceptions of project-based learning in K–12 education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Instruction, 17(3), 509 – 528. 8. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2024.17328a
Sagita, S. ., Rahmat, A. ., Priyandoko, D. ., & Sriyati, S. . (2023). Sustainability of Project-Based Learning: Challenge and Obstacles from Students Perception Point of View. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(2), 810–816. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i2.3044
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation. https://www.bie.org/object/document/a_review_of_research_on_project_based_learning
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Williams, S. (2017). Investigating the allocation and corroboration of individual grades for project-based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53(1), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.009
Yulhendri, Y., Prima Sakti, M. R., Sofya, R., Ritonga, M., Alisha, W. P., Sudjatmoko, A., & Susanti, N. (2023). Strategies for Project Based Learning during the Pandemic: The Benefits of Reflective Learning Approach. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231217885
Zhai, C., & Wibowo, S. (2023). A systematic review on artificial intelligence dialogue systems for enhancing English as foreign language students’ interactional competence in the university. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100134
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cindy Radita, Utami Widiati, Nur Hayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
