Ritual Language and Social Meaning in Tiwah: A Semiotics Study
Authors
-
Imam Qalyubi
Universitas Islam Negeri Palangka Raya
-
Misrita Misrita
Universitas Palangka Raya
-
Huli Li
Yunnan University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i1.4545Keywords:
Ritual language, Structural semiotics, Roland Barthes, Tiwah ceremony, KaharinganAbstract
Despite extensive scholarship on ritual symbolism, studies of Indonesian indigenous rituals have largely treated material objects as culturally meaningful entities without explaining how their meanings are structurally produced, authorized, and stabilized within ritual systems. In particular, the application of Roland Barthes’ structural semiotics to ritual language remains underdeveloped. This study investigates how linguistic authorization functions as a mechanism of semiotic closure through which material objects acquire ritual efficacy within a structured sign system. Employing a qualitative ethnographic design, data were collected through participant observation, interviews with ritual specialists (Basir and Telun), and documentation of ritual utterances and material practices in the Tiwah mortuary ceremony among Kaharingan adherents in Central Kalimantan. The analysis applies Barthes’ Expression-Relation-Content (E-R-C) framework to trace how denotative meanings are transformed into culturally regulated connotations through ritual sequencing and authorized speech. The findings demonstrate that ritual objects do not possess inherent efficacy; rather, their meanings emerge from the structured alignment of material form, ritual position, and linguistically sanctioned authority. Gold (bulau) is reconstituted from a precious metal into a cosmological mediator, while rice (behas) functions as a relational semiotic resource whose meaning is generated through ordered deployment and sequential address. By foregrounding linguistic authorization as a structural mechanism that stabilizes connotation and limits interpretive variability, this study extends Barthesian structural semiotics and offers a transferable analytical model for examining how ritual meaning is produced and governed across diverse cultural contexts of ritual language and symbolism.
Downloads
References
Anwar, K., Saefulloh, A., Surawan, S., Nalus, S., & Zuzanti, Z. (2025). Dayak Ngaju customary sanctions as a rehabilitation mechanism for drug addicts in Central Kalimantan. El-Mashlahah, 15(1), 165-188. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i1.9813
Austin, P. K., & Sallabank, J. (2011). The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge University Press.
Baan, A., Girik Allo, M., Patak, A., Zita, C., & Asrifan, A. (2025). The Kada Tominaa in Toraja Rituals Using Metaphorical Expression Analysis. International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS), 4(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v4i3.207
Baele, S. J., & Balzacq, T. (2022). International rituals: An analytical framework and its theoretical repertoires. Review of International Studies, 48(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000401
Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Éditions du Seuil.
Barthes, R. (1964). Elements of semiology.pdf. Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R. (1977). Image Music Text. Fontana Press.
Basso, E. B., & Senft, G. (2009). Ritual Communication. Routledge.
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. (2003). Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423
Berger, A. A. (2005). Media analysis techniques (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Blommaert, J., & Jie, D. (2020). Ethnographic fieldwork: A beginner's guide. Multilingual Matters.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. C am b r id g e U n iv e r s ity P re s s.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?. Qualitative research in psychology, 18(3), 328-352.
Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of pragmatics, 32(10), 1439-1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00094-6
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (1986). The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California, Berkeley Press, Berkeley, CA.
Cobley, P. (2001). The Routledge Companion To Semiotics and Linguistics. Routledge.
Copland, F., & Creese, A. (2015). Ethical issues in linguistic ethnography: Balancing the micro and the macro. In Ethics in applied linguistics research (pp. 161-178). Routledge.
Danesi, M. (2004). Messages, Signs, and Meanings (Vol. 1). Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research desing: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (Vol. 54). United State of America: Sage Publications.
Crosina, E., Mismetti, M., De Massis, A., Pratt, M. G., & Williams, T. A. (2025). Ethnography in Entrepreneurship Research: Promises, Pitfalls, and Practical Pathways. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(6), 1499-1534. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587251364820
Denzin, N. K. (2018). The qualitative manifesto: A call to arms. Routledge.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge.
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1912)
Eco, U. (1979). A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Endi, Y., Ranubaya, F., & Watu, C. (2024). Pesaguan Dayak Kanjan Serayong Custom: The Relationship between Catholic Faith and Culture. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 23(2), 505–550. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss2.art1
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago press.
Errington, J. (2008). Linguistics in a colonial world. Blackwell Publishing.
Fishman, J. A. (1972). Language in Sociocultural Change. Stanford University Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hall, S. (2009). Culture, the Media and the ‘Ideological Effect.’ In New Critical Writings in Political Sociology. Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Edward Arnold.
Hatch, J. (2010). Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. State university of New York press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780791487945
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics An ethnographic approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315888835
Ismail, M. (2025). Shifting meaning of sacredness in religious rituals sociological studies of indigenous peoples in the era of modernization. Jurnal Asy-Syukriyyah, 26(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.36769/asy.v26i1.873
Istiyanto, B., et al. (2024). Roland Barthes’ semiotic approach to media reports: An Indonesian case. Journal of Language and Media Studies, 15(2), 430-442. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-2-430-442.
Iswanto, I. (2021). Kajian linguistik kebudayaan dalam tuturan Ritual Sèf Alumama masyarakat Boti di Nusa Tenggara Timur [Anthropolinguistic Study of Sèf Alumama Ritual Speech in Boti Community East Nusa Tenggara]. TOTOBUANG, 9(1), 1-13.
Kadar, D. (2024). Ritual and Language. Cambridge University Press.
Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7
Keane, W. (2023). Signs of Recognition: Powers and Hazards of Representation in an Indonesian Society. University of California Press.
Kroskrity, P. V. (1993). Language, history, and identity: Ethnolinguistic studies of the Arizona Tewa. University of Arizona Press.
Kumhaeng, K., & Rakmak, T. (2025). Context shift, word drift: the meaning transference of the word prèet in Thai Society. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-13.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology (C. Jacobson & B. G. Schoepf, Trans.). Basic Books.
Long, J., & He, J. (2021). Cultural Semiotics and the Related Interpretation. In 2021 International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.340
Nofrianti, M., & Alisa, D. (2024). Application of Communication in The Metatah Traditional Ceremony in Bali. Semantik: Journal of Social, Media, Communication, and Journalism, 2(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.31958/semantik.v2i2.11469
Meudell, K. A. (2001). A Semiological Analysis of Organisational Culture and Meaning Making Within The Healthcare Sector. University of Surrey (United Kingdom).
Meyerhoff, M. (2018). Introducing sociolinguistics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. Syntax and semantics, 12, 51-80. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_004
Patton, M. Q., McKegg, K., & Wehipeihana, N. (Eds.). (2015). Developmental evaluation exemplars: Principles in practice. Guilford publications.
Perelaer, M. T. H. (2006). Desersi. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Ramadania, F., & Arifin, J. (2019). Cultural semiotic in Dayak’s Babalai ceremonial at Paramasan as an form of maintaining Dayak language. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 16(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21831/socia.v16i1.25500
Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. In Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814686
Samaratul Zanah, S. W. (2025). Javanese language and cultural identity: The role of ritual speech in ceremonies of Solo City (Undergraduate thesis). University repository.
Senft, G. (2014). Understanding pragmatics. Routledge.
Scharer, H. (1963). Ngaju Religion: The Conception of God among a South Borneo People. Martinus Nijhoff.
Silverstein, M. (1981). The limits of awareness. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, 84. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:28975676
Silverstein, M. (2003). Contemporary Transformations of Local Linguistic Communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.401
Silverstein, M. (2022). Language in Culture Lectures on the Social Semiotics of Language. Cambridge University Press.
Spradley, B. W. (1980). Managing change creatively. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 10(5), 32-36.
Sugiharto, S., & Handayani, M. (2024). Theorizing materiality as cultural discourses. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 19(3), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2025.2507942
Syam, C., Seli, S., & Abdu, W. J. (2023). Dynamics of Language Interaction in Multicultural Urban Communities: Analysis of Socio-Cultural Linguistic Environment. Society, 11(2), 575-588.
Tambiah, S. J. (1985). Culture, Thought, and Social Action: An Anthropological Perspective. Harvard University Press.
Tavárez, D. (2014). Ritual language (pp. 516–536). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.024
Tavárez, D. (2014). Ritual language and the social world. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 231–250). Cambridge University Press.
Tavárez, D. (2025). Words from the gods: Ritual language and indigenous epistemologies. Cambridge University Press.
Turner, V. (1966). The Ritual Process Structure and Anti Structure. Cornell University Press.
Turner, V. W. (1970). The Forest of Symbols Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Cornell University Press.
Urban, G. (1991). A discourse-centered approach to culture: Native South American myths and rituals. University of Texas Press.
Whitehouse, H. (2021). The ritual animal: Imitation and cohesion in the evolution of social complexity. Oxford University Press.
Wirtz, K. (2025). Ritual, discourse, and community in Cuban Santería: speaking a sacred world. University Press of Florida.
Zakaria, Z. (2025). Metaphor symbols in Ma’pandan ritual. Indonesian EFL Journal, 11(2), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v11i2.11772
Zulkarnain, A. I., Surawan, S., & Wahidah, S. N. (2022). Moral Message In Alif And Alya’s Animated Film” Episode 1-4” As Children’s Education (Ronald Barthes Semiotics Analysis). Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 204-210. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v23i2.19647
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Imam Qalyubi, Misrita Misrita, Huli Li
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
