Politeness Strategies in English Directives: Empirical Evidence of Cross-Cultural Communication Among Indonesian and Malaysian Speakers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i2.4595Keywords:
Politeness strategies, Cross-cultural communication, Indonesian (Palembangnese) English speakers, Malaysian English speakers, cultural normsAbstract
Utterances constitute a fundamental form of communication in university settings, where students perform directive speech acts to request, instruct, or negotiate actions with peers, lecturers, and others. Although directives in English are widely used across academic contexts, their linguistic realizations vary across cultures. This study investigates politeness strategies in English directives among Indonesian (Palembangnese) English-speaking students (PSI) and Malaysian English-speaking students (MSM), two culturally related groups with potentially distinct pragmatic orientations. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study integrates Written Discourse Completion Tasks and semi-structured interviews to examine both shared and divergent patterns. The findings indicate that while both groups employ common politeness markers (e.g., “please” and “thank you”) and are sensitive to contextual variables such as age, power, and social distance, they differ in their pragmatic orientations. PSI tend to emphasise expressions such as “excuse me” and respectful address terms, reflecting culturally embedded values of respect and religio-cultural influences, whereas MSM more frequently employ explicit expressions of gratitude, indicating a stronger orientation toward interpersonal management. These results highlight the role of cultural norms in shaping politeness as a reciprocal social practice. Despite its contributions, the study is limited to specific university contexts and age groups. Future research should include more diverse participants and longitudinal designs to capture the dynamic development of politeness strategies. Overall, understanding the cultural and linguistic dimensions of politeness is essential for enhancing cross-cultural communication, reducing misinterpretation, and fostering intercultural awareness in increasingly globalised academic environments.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, R., & Weisi, H. (2023). Grand strategy of politeness in new social networks: revisiting Leech's politeness theory among Iranian EFL learners using Telegram. Journal of Politeness Research. doi:10.1515/pr-2022-0003
Almuhaysh, M. A. (2022). Impact of first language transfer on the use of English prepositions by Arab English learners. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 4(2), 80-96. doi:10.32996/jweep.2022.4.2.7.
Al-Ademi, K. K., & Al-Eryani, A. (2025). English-Arabic Translation of Speech Acts: A Comparative Pragmatic Analysis of King Lear. Centre for Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 16(1). doi:10.60149/WLLA4466
Al-Natour, M. M., BaniKlaef, A., & Al-Bataineh, K. B. (2024). A Sociolinguistic Study on the Addressed Positive Politeness Strategies by the English Professors with Their Bachelor Students. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 5623-5632. doi:10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00419
Austin, J. (1976). How to do things with words (2nd ed. / edited by J.O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà ed.). London: London: Oxford University Press.
Baresh, E. F. (2022). Developing Libyan undergraduates’ writing skills through reflective journaling: a critical literature review. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 27-35. doi:10.33365/jeltl.v3i1.1835.
Bondarchuk, J., Dvorianchykova, S., Shpeniuk, I., Yarova, L., & Vereshchak, Y. (2025). Strategic perspectives on the importance of English in the 21st century: Insights from first-year students. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(1), 1245-1253. doi:10.53894/ijirss.v8i1.4576
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage: Cambridge University Press.
Dey, M. D. (2023). Four Main Characteristics of English Pragmatics. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(2), 510-519. doi:10.24071/llt.v26i2.6202
Diamond, L., Izquierdo, K., Canfield, D., Matsoukas, K., & Gany, F. (2019). A systematic review of the impact of patient–physician non-English language concordance on quality of care and outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine (JGIM), 34(8), 1591-1606. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5.
Ernovilinda, E. (2020). Politeness strategy in Shanghai knights film. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (IJELTAL), 5(1), 39-53. doi:10.21093/ijeltal.v5i1.571.
Fang, F., & Hu, G. (2022). English medium instruction, identity construction and negotiation of Teochew-speaking learners of English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1-16. doi:10.1080/01434632.2022.2051711.
Federici, A. (2025). The pragmatics of online healthcare communication: Politeness strategies in an anxiety and depression support community. Journal of Pragmatics, 246, 74-89. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2025.06.010
Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied linguistics, 24(1), 90-121.
Harris, D. W., Fogal, D., & Moss, M. (2018). Speech acts: The contemporary theoretical landscape. In New Work on Speech Acts (pp. 1-39).
Hidayat, M. T. (2024). English Language Proficiency and Career Opportunities: Perceptions of Indonesian University Graduates. Language Value, 17(1). doi:10.6035/languagev.7933
Hieda, N., Jalaluddin, N. H., & Jaafar, M. F. (2021). Declining an invitation in japanese by malay informants: Analysis of strategies and politeness effects. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(1), 148-165. doi:10.17576/gema-2021-2101-09
Holden, M., & Scerri, A. (2014). Justification, compromise and test: developing a pragmatic sociology of critique to understand the outcomes of urban redevelopment. Planning Theory, 14(4), 360-383. doi:10.1177/1473095214530701.
Huang, L. J. D., & Chen, Y. S. (2023). EFL Student Perceptions of Email Communication in the Academic Context in Taiwan. English Teaching and Learning, 47(1), 47-68. doi:10.1007/s42321-021-00104-3
Huang, W., & Lu, X. (2023). The difficulty of oral speech act production tasks in second language pragmatics testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1096399
Isadaud, D., Fikri, M. D., & Bukhari, M. I. (2022). The urgency of English in the curriculum in Indonesia to prepare human resources for global competitiveness. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran (DIAJAR), 1(1), 51-58. doi:10.54259/diajar.v1i1.177.
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: where language and culture meet (1st ed. ed.): New York : Pearson Longman.
Izadi, A. (2022). Intercultural Politeness and Impoliteness: A Case of Iranian Students with Malaysian Professors. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 33-43. doi:10.22055/rals.2022.17801
Kádár, D. Z., & Zhang, S. (2019). Alignment,‘politeness’ and implicitness in Chinese political discourse: a case study of the 2018 vaccine scandal. Journal of Language and Politics, 18(5), 698-717. doi:10.1075/jlp.18053.kad.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual review of applied linguistics, 19, 81-104.
Kayyali, M. (2025). The pragmatics of politeness in higher educational settings: Professors, students, and power relations. In Socio-Cultural Concepts of (Im)Politeness: Interpretation, Linguistics, and Discourse Analysis (pp. 89-124).
Kristiawan, D., Ferdiansyah, S., & Picard, M. (2022). Promoting vocabulary building, learning motivation, and cultural identity representation through digital storytelling for young Indonesian learners of English as a foreign language. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 19-36. doi: 10.30466/IJLTR.2022.121120.
Larina, T., & Ponton, D. M. (2020). Tact or frankness in English and Russian blind peer reviews. Intercultural Pragmatics, 17(4), 471-496. doi:10.1515/ip-2020-4004.
Lestari, M., & Wahyudin, A. Y. (2020). Language learning strategies of undergraduate EFL students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-30. doi:10.33365/JELTL.V1I1.242.
Leotti, S. M., Sugrue, E. P., & Winges-Yanez, N. (2022). Unpacking the worlds in our words: Critical discourse analysis and social work inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 21(2), 260-276. doi:10.1177/1473325021990860
Lin, M. F., Chen, Y. S., & Wu, H. J. (2024). Individual versus pair work on L2 speech acts: Production and cognitive processes. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(1), 61-82. doi:10.1515/applirev-2021-0088
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: a research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System, 86(November), 102126. doi: j.system.2019.102126.
Mahmud, M. (2019). The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 597-606. doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15258.
Murray, N. (2016). Dealing with diversity in higher education: awareness-raising and a linguistic perspective on teachers’ intercultural competence. International Journal for Academic Development, 21(3), 166-177. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2015.1094660.
Pajarwati, D., Mardiah, H., Harahap, R. P., Siagian, R. O., & Ihsan, M. T. (2021). Curriculum reform in Indonesia: English education toward the global competitiveness. Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review (ETDC), 1(1), 28-36. doi: 10.51574/ijrer.v1i1.51.
Prayitno, H. J., Huda, M., Inayah, N., Ardi, H., & Yusof, N. (2021). Politeness of Directive Speech Acts on Social Media Discourse and Its Implications for Strengthening Student Character Education in the Era of Global Education. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 179-200. doi:10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16205
Ramasamy, R., & Mei, H. C. (2025). Needs Analysis of Professional Writing in the 21st Century Among Malaysian Tertiary Students. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 11(1), 43-52. doi:10.61211/mjqr110104
Saadna, S. (2024). Politeness and In-Directness in Algerian and Russian Classroom Requests. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana, 20(3), 209-232. doi:10.30842/alp23065737203209232
Santos, R. R. S. D., Araneta, J. E., Ingilan, S. S., & Palayon, R. T. (2023). Politeness strategies of Manobo students in a classroom in Kidapawan City, Philippines. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 28(2), 27-54. doi:10.53899/spjrd.v28i2.247
Sapitri, P. A., Chasanah, A., Putri, A. A., & Paulima, J. (2020). Exploring Brown and Levinson's politeness strategies: an explanation on the nature of the politeness phenomenon. Journal of Research and Innovation in Language (ReiLA), 1(3), 111-117. doi:10.31849/reila.v1i3.3801.
Sari, D. N., & Utomo, A. P. Y. (2020). Directive speech act in President Joko Widodo's speech related to handling coronavirus (Covid-19) in Indonesia (Pragmatic review). Jounal of Social Studies, 16(1), 35-50. doi:10.21831/jss.v16i1.32072.
Searle, J. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(01), 1-23. doi:10.1017/S0047404500006837.
Shao, Y., Saito, K., & Tierney, A. (2023). How does having a good ear promote instructed second language pronunciation development? Roles of domain‐general auditory processing in choral repetition training. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 33-63. doi:10.1002/tesq.3120.
Sifianou, M., & Blitvich, G.-C. (2017). (Im)politeness and Cultural Variation. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (pp. 571-599). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Shi, W. (2024). A positioning analysis of international graduate students’ perspectives and practices of translanguaging at a Canadian higher education institution. International Journal of Multilingualism, 21(3), 1517-1531. doi:10.1080/14790718.2023.2189725
Singh, R. K. V., & Shaari, A. H. (2019). The analysis of higher-order thinking skills in English reading comprehension tests in Malaysia. Geografia, 15(1). doi:10.17576/geo-2019-1501-02.
Strickland, A. (2011). Benefits of foreign language instruction. (Master thesis), Western Oregon University.
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100701. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701.
Theunissen, P. (2019). Extending public relationship-building through the theory of politeness. Public Relations Review, 45(3), 101784. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.05.005.
Walton, J., Priest, N., & Paradies, Y. (2013). Identifying and developing effective approaches to foster intercultural understanding in schools. Intercultural Education, 24(3), 181-194. doi:10.1080/14675986.2013.793036.
Xia, D., & Lan, C. (2019). (Im)politeness at a Chinese dinner table: a discursive approach to (im)politeness in multi-party communication. 15(2), 223-256. doi:10.1515/pr-2016-0056.
Yergazy, N., & Denisenko, A. V. (2024). Implementation of Positive and Negative Politeness Strategies in Kazakh and Russian Family Discourse Talk Show. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 15(4), 1232-1244. doi:10.22363/2313-2299-2024-15-4-1232-1244
Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F. A., & Lengkanawati, N. S. (2020). English language education in Indonesia: a review of research (2011–2019). Language Teaching, 53(4), 491-523.
Zhu, H. (2011). Conclusion: studying language and intercultural communication: methodological considerations. In H. Zhu (Ed.), The language and intercultural communication reader (pp. 389-407). London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Susi Herti Afriani, Ria Astina, Jamaliah Said, Coky Fauzi Alfi, Nadia Novriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

