The Relationship Between Perceived Difficulty, Reading Perceptions, and Critical Reading Strategy: A Lesson from EFL University Students
Authors
-
Samsudin Samsudin
STKIP Paracendekia NW Sumbawa
-
Asbar Asbar
Universitas Muhammadiyah Enrekang
-
Iwan Jazadi
STKIP Paracendekia NW Sumbawa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i1.4692Keywords:
Critical reading, Reading perception, Metacognitive strategies, Academic self-regulationAbstract
Critical reading is central to academic literacy in EFL higher education, yet many students struggle to engage strategically with complex academic texts. While prior research has examined reading strategies extensively, empirical attention has been limited to how perceived Difficulty and reading perceptions jointly relate to the use of critical reading strategies in Indonesian university contexts. This study adopted an explanatory sequential mixed-method design involving 32 Indonesian EFL undergraduate students. Quantitative data were collected using a four-point Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. The quantitative phase was followed by semi-structured interviews to explain and contextualize the statistical patterns. The findings indicate that students generally reported high levels of strategy use and positive perceptions of reading, while perceived Difficulty remained moderate. Correlation results showed that reading perception was moderately associated with strategy use, whereas perceived Difficulty demonstrated weak relationships. Although the regression model did not reach statistical significance, reading perception displayed a marginal predictive tendency, suggesting that students’ epistemic orientation toward reading may play a more meaningful role than perceived textual challenge in shaping strategic engagement. Qualitative findings further revealed that students conceptualize Difficulty as multidimensional, encompassing workload, time constraints, motivation, and contextual relevance, rather than merely linguistic complexity. This study suggests that fostering positive perceptions of reading may be more pedagogically impactful than focusing solely on reducing textual Difficulty. The findings contribute to theoretical discussions of the affective–cognitive dimensions of critical reading and offer practical implications for designing strategy-oriented instruction in EFL higher education.
Downloads
References
Afdal, H. W., Spernes, K., & Hoff-Jenssen, R. (2023). Academic reading as a social practice in higher education. Higher Education, 85(6), 1337–1355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00893-x
Ament, J. R., Tort-Cots, I., & Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2025). Implementing academic reading circles in higher education: Exploring perceptions, motivation and outcomes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 75, 101489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101489
Boyraz, S., & Altinsoy, E. (2017). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in EFL context. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(5), 159–167. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3655
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Deliany, Z., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2020). Metacognitive Reading Strategies Awareness and Metacognitive Reading Strategies Use of EFL University Students across Gender. 7(2), 421–437.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage publications limited.
Fu, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Inspecting EFL teachers’ academic literacy development in multilingual contexts: A global vision. Heliyon, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12143
Gallagher, M. A., Beck, J. S., Ramirez, E. M., Barber, A. T., & Buehl, M. M. (2023). Supporting multilingual learners’ reading competence: a multiple case study of teachers’ instruction and student learning and motivation. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1085909. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1085909
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274
Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. In Multivariate data analysis (p. 785).
Hajmási, K., & Machová, R. (2025). Global Research Trends on the Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Tertiary Education : A Bibliometric Analysis from the Perspective of Countries with Varying Human Development Levels. Aministrative Science, 15(296). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15080296
Harimurti, K. F., Basthomi, Y., Zen, E. L., & Malang, U. N. (2023). Journal on English as a Foreign Language EFL students ’ preferences on metacognitive reading strategies within an extensive reading program. Journal on English as a Foreign Language Vol., 13(1), 171–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v13i1.5640 Copyright
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. sage.
Le, H. Van, & Li, C. (2023). The Dynamics of Critical Thinking Skills: A Phenomenographic Exploration from Malaysian and Vietnamese Undergraduates. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101445
Li, H., & Gan, Z. (2022). Reading motivation, self-regulated reading strategies and English vocabulary knowledge: Which most predicted students’ English reading comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1041870. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041870
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology.
Moafian, N., & Ghafournia, N. (2025). Research in English Iranian EFL Learners ’ Academic Self Efficacy , Metacognitive Reading Strategies , and Reading Comprehension Achievement : Exploring the. International Journal of Research in English Education, July, 79–98.
Mohammed, G., & Mohammed, S. (2022). The impact of reading strategies and self-efficacy on reading comprehension : The case of Saudi EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 627–639.
Oranpattanachai, P. (2023). Relationship between the Reading Strategy , Reading Self-Efficacy , and Reading Comprehension of Thai EFL Students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 0672(June).
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Pebriyanti, N. P. (2024). The Correlation Between Metacognitive Reading Strategies , Vocabulary Mastery and Reading Comprehension of The Ninth-Grade Students In SMP Negeri Hindu 2 Payangan. 10(1), 80–91.
Putwain, D. W., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2022). Achievement emotions and academic achievement: Reciprocal relations and the moderating influence of academic buoyancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(1), 108.
Qiu, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2023). Transnational Students ’ Epistemic Participation in English-Medium Instruction Programs.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Springer.
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4
Teng, M. F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Development of children’s metacognitive knowledge, reading, and writing in English as a foreign language: Evidence from longitudinal data using multilevel models. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1202–1230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12413
Trigos-Carrillo, L. (2019). A critical sociocultural perspective on academic literacies in Latin America. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 24(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n01a10
Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2061683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683
Wang, C., & Sun, T. (2020). Relationship between self-efficacy and language proficiency: A meta-analysis. System, 95, 102366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102366
Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
Yang, K., & Gan, Z. (2024). A systematic review of reading self-efficacy in second or foreign language learning. System, 125, 103436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103436
Yulita, D., & Napitupulu, M. H. (2023). Metacognitive Reading Strategies in EFL Context : A Systematic Literature. Indonesian Educational Research Journal, 1(1), 18–25.
Zhang, Lian. (2013). Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Reading Achievement : Insights from a Chinese Context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54–69.
Zhang, Limei, & Liu, G. (2017). Metacognitive and cognitive strategy use in reading comprehension. Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Samsudin Samsudin, Asbar Asbar, Iwan Jazadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
