Politeness Strategies Used in the Interview between Amna Nawaz and the Iranian Foreign Minister on Iran vs the USA-Israel War
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i2.4841Keywords:
Politeness strategies, Face-threatening acts, Political interview, Communicative rolesAbstract
Political interviews frequently address sensitive issues, particularly in high-stakes contexts such as war, diplomacy, and international conflict. In such situations, speakers are frequently confronted with face-threatening questions that challenge their authority and institutional image. Therefore, politeness strategies are applied to minimize face-threatening acts (FTAs) and maintain harmonious interaction. This study examines the application of politeness strategies by both participants and explains their implications in the interaction. The interview discussed the ongoing war between Iran versus the United States of America (USA) and Israel. This research adopts Brown and Levinson (1987) politeness strategies framework and applied qualitative content analysis as the method. This study uses documentation technique to analyze the data. The data were collected from the PBS NewsHour official YouTube channel. The findings show that there are 85 utterances contain politeness strategies in the interaction. Amna Nawaz produced 29 utterances containing politeness strategies and predominantly employed Negative Politeness with 15 occurrences. In contrast, Abbas Araghchi produced 56 utterances and mainly used Bald on Record, accounting for 37 occurrences. The predominant strategy used by Amna Nawaz used to minimize imposition and maintain respect while asking critical questions. In contrast, the Iranian Foreign Minister predominantly applied bald on-record strategy. It was used to provide direct and clear responses that represented Iran’s official stance. These patterns reflect their different communicative roles. The interviewer predominantly use negative politeness strategies to mitigates face-threatening questions while the interviewee adopts a direct and firm response to defend institutional positions.
Downloads
References
Andini, N., Saehu, A., & Wardoyo, C. (2025). Politeness Maxims Used on Talkshow Video Entitled “Culture Shock or Shock Culture, Which One?” in Dedi_4548 YouTube Chanel. 10(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55345/stba1.v10i1.9
Bărbuleţ, G.-D. (2025). Politeness and Implicatures in Social Media Interactions: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica, 26(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.56177/AUA.PHILOLOGICA.1.26.2025.art.19
Beschieru, M. (2021). Changes in the Classroom Discourse: Negative Politeness and Impoliteness. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica, 13(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2021-0012
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (1987a). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (1987b). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Chaqmaqchee, O. M., & Jasim, Z. F. (2022). EFL Undergraduate Learners’ Politeness Strategies in the Speech Act of Disagreement. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 1. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p1
Dalimunte, A., & Wen, F. (2022). Shaping political image through politeness strategies in the presidential debates. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 7(1), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v7i1.1660
Duffau, E., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2024). Expecting politeness: Perceptions of voice assistant politeness. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 28(6), 907–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-024-01822-8
Ejembi, D. O., & Abochol, S. I. (2026). Face-Threatening Acts in the Writing and Presentation of Minutes in Selected Organisational Meetings. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 15(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2026-0096
Handayani, S. (2023). Potential verbal attacks in a television political talk show: A case of a host’s questioning. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 802–814. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.53414
Haristiani, N., Septiana, A., Nor, N. F. Mohd., & Ryota, N. (2023). The politeness of criticism speech acts in Japanese and Minangkabau films. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58272
Haryanto, H., Indriani, N., Safar, Muh., Fansiska, F. W., & Dewi, D. U. (2024). The Use of Politeness Strategy and The Influence Factors in Political Talk Show. Surakarta English and Literature Journal, 7(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.52429/selju.v7i1.214
Khoiriyah, S. (2016). Face Strategies Used by Host in Interviewing Politician and Non-Politician Shown in Talk Rachel Maddow Show. Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University of Malang.
Lee, A. J., Mason, M. F., & Malcomb, C. S. (2021). Beyond cheap talk accounts: A theory of politeness in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 41, 100154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2021.100154
Macaulay, M. (2017). The question of politeness in political interviews. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.4.03mac
Pathanasin, S., & Eschstruth, I. (2022). The Politeness Strategies of Thai Undergraduates in an Instant Messaging Application. rEFLections, 29(1), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v29i1.258888
Pompeu, A. C. M. (2021). Analysis on the use of politeness strategies in a scene of The Crown. BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 12(1), e41365. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2021.1.41365
Purba, A., Nasution, T., Matondang, M. K., Zulkarnain, Z., & Purba, R. (2023). Application of Brown and Levinson’s Model on Joe Biden’s Victory Speech: A Case on Politeness Strategy. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i1.7575
Rahardi, R. K., Setyaningsih, Y., Sulistiyono, R., & Febriani, S. T. (2025). Discursive-Integrative Politeness Meanings in Digital Spaces: A Third-Wave Pragmatic Analysis of Face-Threatening Acts in Online Communication. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(12), 4096–4107. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1512.29
Rajik, J. (2025). Politeness Strategies in Political Discourse: A Study through the Lens of Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis, 4(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.32996/jpda.2025.4.1.4
Schilling, J. (2017). Qualitative content analysis in leadership research: Principles, process and application. In B. Schyns, R. J. Hall, & P. Neves (Eds.), Handbook of Methods in Leadership Research. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367281.00023
Syting, C. J. O., & Gildore, P. J. E. (2022). Teachers’ Linguistic Politeness in Classroom Interaction: A Pragmatic Analysis. World Journal of English Language, 12(8), 133. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n8p133
Tabachnikov, Y. Y. (2024). Means of Expressing Communicative Threats to the Addressee’s and Addresser’s Negative Face in German Linguoculture. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series Humanitarian and Social Sciences, (3), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V351
Triyono, S., Sahayu, W., & Yuliana, F. (2025). Politeness and Impoliteness by Teachers and Students in Technology-Assisted Teaching and Learning process. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.17509/azngyy22
Wardoyo, C. (2017). Positive Politeness on Strategies of Expressing Apologies by English Department Students of UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. Buletin Al-Turas, 23(2), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v23i2.5786
Wardoyo, C. (2024). Expressions of advice in a corpus of Islamic sermons online. Coventry University.
Wright, K. O. (2017). Content Analysis, Qualitative. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (1st ed., pp. 1–9). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0044
Yafi, M. A., & Maris, D. (2025a). Managing Face: A Pragmatic Analysis of Political Interview Discourse in Indonesia. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 7(2), 483–510. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v7i2.483-510
Yafi, M. A., & Maris, D. (2025b). Politeness in Political Interviews: A Pragmatic Analysis of Indonesian Presidential Candidates’ Answers to Critical Questions. ICEETE Conference Series, 3(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.36728/iceete.v3i1.225
Yaghoubzadeh, S. (2021). A Study of Requests Made by Negative Politeness in English Movies and Their Persian Subtitles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(2), 216. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1102.15
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Felicia Farrah Zelina, Mahi M. Hkikmat, Wardoyo Cipto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

