The Influence of EFL Students’ Socioeconomic Background on English Learning Motivation: A Lesson from Rural Indonesian High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i2.4931Keywords:
English learning, Indonesian rural schools, Motivation to learn, Socioeconomic statusAbstract
Motivation is a critical factor in English language acquisition, and its significance is widely acknowledged. However, disparities in income and resources, particularly in rural schools, strongly affect how motivated students feel. Socioeconomic status (SES) is recognized as a factor that influences academic achievement. The effect of SES on students’ motivation to learn English in rural Indonesia has not been widely studied. This study aims to investigate how socioeconomic status (SES) influences students' English learning motivation. This study used a qualitative case study method with 15 participants, selected and grouped according to the Modified Kuppuswamy Scale. This qualitative case study looks at how SES influences the motivation of students at a senior high school in a rural area. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis, employing Bourdieu’s (1986) concepts of cultural capital and habitus, as well as Gardner and Lambert’s (1972) Socio-Educational Model of Second Language Acquisition. The findings suggest that SES does not directly influence motivation. Instead, SES affects motivation indirectly through access to learning resources, family support, self-confidence, and social perception. Despite limited resources, students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds frequently remain motivated by aspirations for improved future opportunities. The study demonstrates that students who possess personal agency and receive support from teachers are more capable of addressing economic challenges. The findings further recommend the implementation of inclusive teaching methods and ensuring equitable access to resources for rural learners.
Downloads
References
Adeooye-Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 4(10), 1358–1367. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/phprpubs/6
Alhamami, M. (2023). Inequity, inequality, and language rights in English as a medium of instruction programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102297
Ariani, M. G., & Ghafournia, N. (2016). The relationship between socio-economic status, general language learning outcome, and beliefs about language learning. International Education Studies, 9(2), 89. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n2p89
Azubuike, O. B., Moore, R., & Vaidya, G. (2023). Using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural reproduction to examine English language learning: A multilevel study in three lower- and middle-income countries. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1), 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100578
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Musi Rawas. (2022). Kecamatan Megang Sakti dalam Angka 2022 (Megang Sakti Subdistrict in Figure 2022). https://musirawaskab.bps.go.id/id/publication/2022/09/26/3adeed77c6a6f94d7750b9d4/megang-sakti-subdistrict-in-figures-2022.html
Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. (2024). Provinsi Sumatera Selatan Dalam Angka 2024. In 2024 Dalam Angka (Vol. 42). https://sumsel.bps.go.id/id/publication/2024/02/28/24b0b0a6676d1d095ab88ce2/provinsi-sumatera-selatan-dalam-angka-2024.html
Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding satisfaction: intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2563–2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z
Bank Indonesia. (2024). Laporan Perekonomian Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. In Bank Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/laporan/lpp/Pages/Laporan-Perekonomian-Provinsi-Sumatera-Selatan-Mei-2024.aspx
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2023). Investment and motivation in language learning: What’s the difference? Language Teaching, 56(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000057
Dodgson, J. E. (2017). About research: Qualitative methodologies. Journal of Human Lactation, 33(2), 355–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334417698693
Dörnyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the l2 learning experience, the cinderella of the L2 motivational self system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.1.2
Edgerton, J. D., & Roberts, L. W. (2014). Cultural capital or habitus? Bourdieu and beyond in the explanation of enduring educational inequality. Theory and Research in Education, 12(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878514530231
Farrell, L. (2010). Pierre Bourdieu on European identity: Theories of habitus & cultural capital. Social and Political Review, 20, 107–115. http://www.spr.tcdlife.ie/seperatearticles/xxarticles/theoryidentity.pdf
Gardner, R. C. (2006). Motivation and attitudes in second language learning. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00625-8
Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition. Porta Linguarum, 8, 9–20.
Ghorbani, M. R., & Golparvar, S. E. (2019). Modeling the relationship between socioeconomic status, self-initiated, technology-enhanced language learning, and language outcome. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585374
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Hernández, C. F. R., Cascallar, E., & Kyndt, E. (2019). Socio-economic status and academic performance in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100305
Hosen, M. A. (2021). The effects of socio-economic drawbacks on second language learning in Bangladesh. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(2), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i2.1034
Hovhannisyan, I., Sougari, A., & Mattheoudakis, M. (2022). Examining the impact of university students’ socio-economic status on their attitudes towards foreign language. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 24, 368–383. https://doi.org/10.26262/istal.v24i0.9195
Hui, X., & Chen, Y. (2025). The mediating role of English learning motivation between socioeconomic status and pragmatic awareness. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1471108
Huwari, I. F. (2021). Language attitudes of Jordanian students towards English language. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(4), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.36941/AJIS-2021-0113
Iwaniec, J. (2020). The effects of parental education level and school location on language learning motivation. Language Learning Journal, 48(4), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1422137
Khan, I. (2016). Positive attitude and English language learning: Psycho-pedagogic connections. Arab World English Journal, 7(1), 432–444. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no1.26
Liu, H., Zhang, X., & Fang, F. (2023). Young English learners’ attitudes towards China English: unpacking their identity construction with implications for secondary level language education in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(1), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1908228
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2019). Promoting growth in foreign and second language education: A research agenda for mindsets in language learning and teaching. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102126
Madya, R., Malik, M., & Suparno, S. (2019). The impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on early childhood language development. International Conference on Special and Inclusive Education (ICSIE 2018), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.2991/icsie-18.2019.26
Moskowitz, S., & Dewaele, J. M. (2019). Is teacher happiness contagious? A study of the link between perceptions of language teacher happiness and student attitudes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1707205
Munir, J., Faiza, M., Jamal, B., Daud, S., & Iqbal, K. (2023). The impact of socio-economic status on academic achievement. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(2), 695–705. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.308
Oduro-Ofori, E., Mansoh, M., Effeh Attom, L., Afi Ocloo, K., & Baah Kwarteng Amaka-Otchere, A. (2023). Effect of parental socio-economic status on the performance of senior high school students in the Sefwi Wiawso Municipality in Ghana. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2023v04i02.0276
Owoseni, A., Ibem, E., & Opoko, A. (2020). Socio-economic profiling of students and its impact on learning outcomes. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(19), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i19.14649
Sabri, R. A., & Hamid, R. (2023). Socioeconomic status and motivation effect on students’ English speaking skill. International Journal of English Learning and Applied Linguistics (IJELAL), 3(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.21111/ijelal.v3i2.10117
Saleem, S. M., & Jan, S. S. (2021). Modified kuppuswamy socioeconomic scale updated for the year 2021. Indian Journal of Forensic and Community Medicine, 8(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfcm.2021.001
Seven, M. A. (2020). Motivation in language learning and teaching. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.30918/AERJ.8S2.20.033
Sohid, A. N., & Rifai, I. (2022). Language attitude of Generation Z: Gender and socioeconomic status analysis. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 10(1).
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Sun, Y., & Gao, F. (2020). An investigation of the influence of intrinsic motivation on students’ intention to use mobile devices in language learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9
Taie, M., & Afshari, A. (2015). A critical review on the socio-educational model of SLA. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(3), 605. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0503.21
van Maanen, H. (2009). Pierre Bourdieu’s grand theory of the artistic field. In How to Study Art Worlds (pp. 53–82). Amsterdam University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt46n0p3.6
Vu, N. T., & Do, T. H. (2021). Developing capital in language learning: A mixed-method study on Vietnamese English learners. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 8(3), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/779
Wichadee, S., & Pattanapichet, F. (2018). Enhancement of performance and motivation through application of digital games in an English language class. Teaching English with Technology, 18(1), 77–92.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurus Sholihatuddina, Soni Mirizon, Amrullah Mirizon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

