Patterns of AI Integration in Literary Translation: Student Translators' Outputs and Strategies
Authors
-
Lia Agustina Damanik
STAIN Mandailing Natal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i2.4944Keywords:
AI literacy, Literary translation, Translation pedagogy, Critical AI use, Translation strategyAbstract
As AI translation tools increasingly enter translator training, understanding how students use them critically especially in literary translation has become essential. Literary texts require nuanced handling of culture, figurative language, and style, areas where raw AI output often fails. This qualitative descriptive study examined AI integration patterns among 18 undergraduate literary translators. With AI permitted, students completed five tasks: narrative analysis, element mapping, glossary building, translation, and written strategy justification. Open coding and textual triangulation revealed five patterns: (1) prioritizing communicative meaning, (2) domesticating while retaining cultural terms, (3) preserving religious-cultural elements, (4) documenting techniques item by item, and (5) producing strong outputs with minimal justification. A critical finding: translation quality alone cannot detect AI use; only written justifications make it visible. A three-tier developmental framework emerged: Exceptional (28%; 93–97/100), Strong (44%; 83–90/100), and Incomplete (28%; 37–65/100). Tier placement depended primarily on explicit grounding in translation theory (Newmark, Baker, Venuti). Theory-grounded students used AI more reflectively, treating outputs as provisional, recognizing untranslatability, and preserving cultural-spiritual concepts. Two phenomenological case studies (S1, S2) showed that translation excellence follows complementary pathways, with theoretical grounding as the common mechanism enabling critical AI use. The study recommends task designs that demand reflective transparency and pre-task theoretical instruction to foster critical AI literacy in literary translation pedagogy.
Downloads
References
Abdelhalim, S. M., Alsuhaibani, Z., & Alsahil, A. (2025). Empowering student translators: The impact of ChatGPT training on self-efficacy in literary translation. SAGE Open, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251374800
Al Awdi, M. (2025). Equivalence in meaning: A comparative analysis of Nida’s and Newmark’s translation theories. Educalitra: English Education, Linguistics, and Literature Journal, 4(1), 86–103.
Alaa, A. M., & Al Sawi, I. (2023). The analysis and quality assessment of translation.
Aleedy, M., Alshihri, F., Meshoul, S., Al-Harthi, M., Alramlawi, S., Aldaihani, B., Shaiba, H., & Atwell, E. (2025). Designing AI-powered translation education tools: A framework for parallel sentence generation using SauLTC and LLMs. PeerJ Computer Science, 11, Article e2788. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2788
Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Multilingual Matters.
Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619187
Beeby, A., Ensinger, D., & Presas, M. (2003). Building a translation competence model. In F. Alves (Ed.), Triangulating translation: Perspectives in process-oriented research (pp. 91–110). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Belhassen, S., & Hamda, A. (2025). Translation students’ reliance on and trust in artificial intelligence for successful translation projects: Opportunities, challenges, and implications. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies, 9(2), 106–119.
Egdom, G. W., Declercq, C., & Kosters, O. (2024). Prompting ChatGPT to enhance literary MT output. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Creative-Text Translation and Technology (pp. 15–25).
González Davies, M., & Scott-Tennent, C. (2005). A problem-solving and student-centred approach to the translation of cultural references. Meta, 50(1), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.7202/010666ar
Hajmalek, M. M., & Aghamohammadi, J. (2023). Applying task-based language teaching to translation instruction: Challenges and prospects. Language Related Research, 13(6), 99–129.
Hao, L., Tian, K., Salleh, U. K. M., Leng, C. H., Ge, S., & C., X. (2024). The effect of project-based learning and project-based flipped classroom on critical thinking and creativity for business English course at higher vocational colleges. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21.
Ibrahim, N. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) translation tools: Implications for tertiary students’ language proficiency. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS
Kornacki, M. (2025). Integrating generative AI into translator training: Challenges.
Krings, H. P. (2001). Repairing texts: Empirical investigations of machine translation processes. Kent State University Press.
Lee, S. M. (2021). The effectiveness of machine translation in foreign language education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1–2), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1901745
Liu, K., & Afzaal, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI) and translation teaching: A critical perspective on the transformation of education. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 33(1–3), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2021/33.1-3.1159
Naeem, M., Ssemugabi, S., & Yang, L. (2025). AI revolution in literary translation: A bibliometric review. Journal of Innovation in Science, Technology and Management, 10(40), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.1040008
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.
Reyes Lozano, J., & Mejías-Climent, L. (2023). Beyond the black mirror effect: The impact of machine translation in the audiovisual translation environment. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies, 22, 1–28.
Sohail, A., & Zhang, L. (2025). Using large language models to facilitate academic work in the psychological sciences. Current Psychology, 44(9), 7910–7918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07438-2
Strauss, A. M., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Venuti, L. (2017). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: Insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y
Wutich, A., Beresford, M., & Bernard, H. R. (2024). Sample sizes for 10 types of qualitative data analysis. [Publication details needed].
Xiao, L., & Zeng, J. (2023). An empirical study on the improvement of students’ strategic competence.
Zulkifli, M. F. (2025). AI revolution in literary translation: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 10(40), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.35631/JISTM.1040008
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lia Agustina Damanik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
