EFL Learners’ Expectations and Perceived Instructional Fulfilment in a University-Based English Course: A Mixed-Methods Study

Sri Hartiningsih; Erly  Wahyuni; Riza  Elfana; Laela Hikmah  Nurbatra; Silvia Kusuma  Sasmita; Regina Angelic Medy  Ananta

doi:10.36312/jolls.v6i3.6047

Authors

Sri Hartiningsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Erly Wahyuni Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Riza Elfana Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Laela Hikmah Nurbatra Pennsylvania State University
Silvia Kusuma Sasmita Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
Regina Angelic Medy Ananta Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i3.6047

Keywords:

Learner expectations, Perceived fulfillment, English courses, Non-formal education

Abstract

In the digital era, aligning instructional practices with learner expectations has become increasingly critical for the success of foreign language programs, particularly in non-formal educational contexts where learners voluntarily enroll with strong instrumental motivations. Despite the recognized importance of learner-centered pedagogy, a significant gap persists between what learners expect from language courses and what is actually delivered in the classroom. This study aims to explore English learners' expectations and examine the extent to which these expectations are perceived as fulfilled in a university-based English course. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study design was employed, involving 22 English language learners at the Foreign Language Course (KBA). Quantitative data were collected using an opened ended in the beginning course and five-point Likert scale questionnaire administered after ten course meetings, while qualitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with 11 of the 22 respondents to explain and contextualize the numerical findings. Descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage) and thematic analysis based on the Miles and Huberman interactive model were used to analyze the data. The findings reveal that learners hold multidimensional expectations, with speaking skills (77%) and a non-threatening learning environment (82%) being the highest priorities. Learners perceived high fulfillment of expectations regarding teacher competence (59-77% highly suitable), teacher attitudes (68-86% highly suitable), and learning environment (68-77% highly suitable). However, two notable gaps were identified: the use of interactive applications such as Quizizz and Kahoot (36.3% slightly suitable) and schedule flexibility (18.1% slightly suitable and 4.5% unsuitable). This study concludes that learners generally reported positive perceptions of teacher-related and classroom-environment dimensions, accompanied by lower ratings for interactive applications and scheduling. However, these findings represent perceived fulfillment rather than objective evidence of instructional quality or language learning outcomes. The results may serve as formative feedback for program planning rather than definitive evaluation, and future research should incorporate observational and achievement measures to complement self-report data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sri Hartiningsih, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas Gg. 15c Tlogomas, Lowokwaru, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Erly Wahyuni, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas Gg. 15c Tlogomas, Lowokwaru, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Riza Elfana, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas Gg. 15c Tlogomas, Lowokwaru, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Laela Hikmah Nurbatra, Pennsylvania State University

Curriculum and Instructions, Pennsylvania State University, 170 Chambers Building, University Park, PA 16802-3205, United States
Silvia Kusuma Sasmita, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas Gg. 15c Tlogomas, Lowokwaru, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
Regina Angelic Medy Ananta, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

English Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Jl. Raya Tlogomas Gg. 15c Tlogomas, Lowokwaru, Malang, East Java, Indonesia

References

Arta, B., Kholis, A., Rahayu, R., Azmi, U., & Lisan, K. H. (2023). Looking for insights: a comparison of secondary education English curricula in Indonesia and Estonia. Journal Of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 4(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/JAMR.4.2.76-89

Barroga, E., Matanguihan, G. J., Furuta, A., Arima, M., Tsuchiya, S., Kawahara, C., & Takamiya, Y. (2023). Conducting and Writing Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 38(37), 1–16.

Batterton, K. A., & Hale, K. N. (2017). The Likert scale what it is and how to use it. Phalanx, 50(2), 32–39.

Burns, A., & Richards, J. C. (2018). The Cambridge guide to learning English as a second language. Cambridge University Press.

Campbell, L., & Grondona, V. (2008). Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 15th edn. Ed. Language, 84(3), 636–641.

Casanova, C. R., King, J. A., & Fischer, D. (2023). Exploring the role of intentions and expectations in continuing professional development in sustainability education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128, 104115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104115

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge university press.

Ellis, R. (2017). Task-based language teaching. In The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 108–125). Routledge.

Gjikolli, L., & Gashi-Berisha, V. (2023). Learning foreign languages with communicative and action approach and CEFR standards (Digital Technology Supported). XLinguae, 16(2), 33 – 45. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2023.16.02.03

Hartiningsih, S. (2020). The Obstacles on Learning European Communication at Foreign Language Course in Malang Raya. Sociology Study, 10(5).

Henry, M. (2020). Online student expectations: A multifaceted, student-centred understanding of online education. Student Success, 11(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.1678

Hikmah, D. (2019). Media For Language Teaching and Learning in Digital Era. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics (IJoEEL), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v1i2.963

Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480999036X

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303

Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification. Collabra: Psychology. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf

Lee, S.-M. (2022). A systematic review of context-aware technology use in foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(3), 294 – 318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1688836

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1478223

Marreddy, Y. . (2019). Methods Of Teaching English Literature For Students Of Graduation In Andhra Pradesh. Think India, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.26643/think-india.v22i2.8749

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. sage.

Murphy, D. (2018). Open and distance non-formal education in developing countries. Taylor & Francis.

Muttaqin, S., & Chuang, H.-H. (2022). Learning expectations, challenges, and strategies of university students on English-medium instruction. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v12i2.4041

Neupane, U. (2023). BBS First Year Students’ Expectations in Learning English. Vox Batauli. https://doi.org/10.3126/vb.v8i1.54857

Nimmannit, S. (2020). The Cambridge Guide to Learning English as a Second Language by Anne Burns and Jack Richards. THAITESOL Journal, 33(1), 72–76.

Oller Jr, J. W. (1988). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. By Stephen D. Krashen. London & New York: Longman, 1985. Pp. viii, 120. $12.95. Language, 64(1), 171–173.

Panitz, C., Endres, D., Buchholz, M., Khosrowtaj, Z., Sperl, M. F. J., Mueller, E. M., Schubö, A., Schütz, A. C., Teige-Mocigemba, S., & Pinquart, M. (2021). A revised framework for the investigation of expectation update versus maintenance in the context of expectation violations: The ViolEx 2.0 model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 726432.

Ramachandran, V. S. (2012). Encyclopedia of Human Behavior: Second edition. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior: Second Edition.

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today (Vol. 25, Number 2). Cambridge university press Cambridge.

Ried, L., Eckerd, S., & Kaufmann, L. (2021). Social desirability bias in PSM surveys and behavioral experiments: Considerations for design development and data collection. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2021.100743

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning1. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

Sojoodizadeh, R., Ahangari, S., & Sheykhsaran, E. (2020). Evaluation of Tabriz medical students’ expectations of learning English for specific purposes (ESP): A focus on gender and subject field. Research and Development in Medical Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.2020.005

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Bisnis Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. Rosdakarya.

Teh, W. L., Abdin, E., P.V., A., Kumar, F. D. S., Roystonn, K., Wang, P., Shafie, S., Chang, S., Jeyagurunathan, A., Vaingankar, J., Sum, C., Lee, E. S., Van Dam, R., & Subramaniam, M. (2023). Measuring social desirability bias in a multi-ethnic cohort sample: its relationship with self-reported physical activity, dietary habits, and factor structure. BMC Public Health, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15309-3

Tomlinson, A., Simpson, A., & Killingback, C. (2023). Student expectations of teaching and learning when starting university: a systematic review. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2212242

Tomlinson, B. (2023). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474211826

Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Tsai, Y. S., Drachsler, H., Scheffel, M., & Gašević, D. (2021). An exploratory latent class analysis of student expectations towards learning analytics services. Internet and Higher Education, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100818

Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A meta‐analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184–207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/036452042000228054