The Implementation of the Reciprocal Teaching Method to Improve Students' Creativity and Learning Outcomes in Sociology Subject of Class XII IPS 4 at SMAN 3 Mataram
Downloads
How to Cite
This research is a Classroom Action Research (CAR) which aims to improve creativity and student learning outcomes in Sociology subjects in class XII IPS 4 SMAN 3 Mataram through the application of the reciprocal teaching method. This research was conducted in two cycles, where each cycle consisted of two meetings. The reciprocal teaching method was chosen because it can improve conceptual understanding through active interaction between students and teachers, as well as encourage critical thinking skills. In cycle I, the results of the study showed that the learning process with this method achieved an achievement of 76%, student creativity only reached 36% in the good category, and student learning outcomes that achieved KKM 75 were only 33%. Because it had not met the expected performance indicators, the study was continued to cycle II. In cycle II, there was a significant increase, where the achievement of the learning process increased to 100%, student creativity increased to 80% in the good category, and student learning outcomes showed that 83% of students had achieved KKM. Thus, the results of this study prove that the application of the reciprocal teaching method can significantly improve creativity and student learning outcomes in the Sociology subject of class XII IPS 4 SMAN 3 Mataram.
Assali, M. (2024). Enhancing pedagogical creativity: A comprehensive study of self-professional development among ESL educators. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.58256/et4a4a30
Bakar, Z. (2020). Upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar IPS terpadu materi pokok perubahan sosial budaya dan globalisasi melalui penerapan metode reciprocal teaching siswa kelas IX.2 MTsN 10 Bireuen. Ranah Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(4), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v2i4.411
Belland, B. (2013). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 505–518). Cambridge University Press.
Boateng, S., & Kalonde, G. (2024). Exploring the synergy of the SAMR model and technology integration in education. ARETL, 1(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.33422/aretl.v1i1.185
Cant, S., Savage, M., & Chatterjee, A. (2019). Popular but peripheral: The ambivalent status of sociology education in schools in England. Sociology, 54(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519856815
Dadabhoy, K., & Dadabhoy, M. (2021). Implementation of reciprocal teaching strategies: Improving reading skills and academic performance of secondary students. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 4(3), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v4i3.180
Ejiogu, C., Akakuru, O., Obinna-Akakuru, A., & Ordua, V. (2021). Affective response of students on the integration of think-pair-share and reciprocal teaching. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2021/v20i330486
Erianjoni, E., Beri, D., & Yusra, A. (2023). Contextual sociology teaching materials for high school sociology learning (pp. 189–195). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_23
Fitri, N. M., & Sari, S. R. (2020). Pengaruh kreativitas dan minat belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Silogisme, 4(2), 68–73.
Hacker, D., & Tenent, A. (2002). Implementing reciprocal teaching in the classroom: Overcoming obstacles and making modifications. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.699
Henita, M., Rahmayanti, H., & Ichsan, I. Z. (2023). The effect of reciprocal teaching on cognitive learning outcomes and learning interests of learners. Journal of Biology Education, 12(2), 200–209.
Hutauruk, E. E., Anzelina, D., Abi, A. R., & Silaban, P. J. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2116–2121.
Iserbyt, P., Ward, P., & Li, W. (2015). Effects of improved content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 20(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1095868
Jumaida, S. (2023). Increasing motivation and learning outcomes through PBL. Journal of Dehasen Educational Review, 4(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.33258/joder.v4i02.4638
Kabash, M. (2018). A program based on reciprocal teaching for reading comprehension. Majallat Kulliyat al-Tarbiyah, 15(1), 441–482. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfe.2018.73906
Kasuma, S., & Wiyasa, I. G. N. A. (2021). Reciprocal teaching and digital tools integration. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(1), 23–35.
Lee, H., Chung, C., & Wei, G. (2022). Research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.765233
Lestari, S. (2023). Enhancing enthusiasm and achievement in sociology. Education & Learning, 3(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.57251/el.v3i2.770
Mafarja, N., Mohamad, M., Zulnaidi, H., & Fadzil, H. (2023). Using of reciprocal teaching to enhance academic achievement: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(7), e18269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18269
Nasution, S. (1993). Pengembangan kurikulum. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Navaie, L. (2018). Reciprocal teaching and reading comprehension of Iranian learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.26
Nuraini, S. (2012). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif melalui reciprocal teaching. [Thesis, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarief Kasim Riau]. https://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/2390/
Oo, T., Magyar, A., & Habók, A. (2021). Reciprocal teaching for reading achievement in Myanmar. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(4), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09707-8
Okkinga, M., van der Steensel, R., Gelderen, A., & Sleegers, P. (2016). Effects of reciprocal teaching on low-achieving adolescents. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12082
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching for comprehension monitoring. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Raslie, M., Mikeng, C., & Ting, S. H. (2015). Reciprocal teaching and struggling readers. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 3(2), 1–7.
Riyadi, S., & Sudiyatno, T. (2023). Impact of online learning on student motivation. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 8(1), 10–20.
Rosencrum, E. C., Hildebrand, E. E., & Negron, M. (2021). Peer-assisted learning in education. Athletic Training Education Journal, 16(2), 142–149.
Sari, N., Rozhana, K., & Sugiharto, F. (2024). Teaching function using RT strategies. Brazilian Journal of Development, 10(3), e68052. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv10n3-044
Sarwinda, W. (2012). Reciprocal teaching dalam pembelajaran Biologi. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 10(2), 254–258.
Susilowati, D. (2018). Penelitian tindakan kelas: Solusi problematika pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika, 2(1), 1–12.
Triyanto, T. (2014). Pengantar pendidikan. PT Bumi Aksara.
Ulpah, M., & Sahly, M. (2020). Reciprocal teaching and self-regulated learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Engineering, 3, 585–588. https://doi.org/10.14421/icse.v3.569
Vahlia, I., & Sudarman, S. W. (2015). Reciprocal teaching and student learning. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.24114/aksioma.v4i1.94
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wuryaningtyas, A., & Irsadi, A. (2023). Reciprocal teaching and environmental education. Journal of Biology Education, 12(2), 200–209.
Yulius, Y., Bahari, Y., & Fatmawati, F. (2024). Influence of learning motivation on sociology learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi dan Humaniora, 15(1), 244. https://doi.org/10.26418/j-psh.v15i1.77365
Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in one-to-one laptop environments. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1052–1084. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316628645
Copyright (c) 2025 Saptiyan Cahyono Putra, Ni Made Novi Suryanti, Imam Malik, Hairil Wadi, Haruman Haruman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
