Persepsi Guru terhadap Hambatan Pembelajaran Matematika dan Integrasi Computational Thinking

Authors

  • Eliska Juliangkary undiksha
  • I Nengah Suparta Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Made Ardana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Gusti Ayu Mahayukti Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/rj.v5i2.3218

Keywords:

Computational Thinking, Persepsi Guru, Hambatan Belajar Matematika, Pendidikan Menengah

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi persepsi guru terhadap hambatan pembelajaran matematika serta peluang integrasi Computational Thinking (CT) pada tingkat pendidikan menengah. Subjek penelitian melibatkan tujuh guru matematika di SMP Negeri 6 Denpasar dengan latar belakang usia, pengalaman, dan pendidikan yang beragam. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan instrumen berupa angket tertutup dan terbuka. Data dianalisis melalui persentase dan frekuensi untuk jawaban kuantitatif, serta analisis tematik untuk jawaban kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar guru (85,7%) mengidentifikasi hambatan utama terjadi pada topik abstrak, khususnya geometri dan aljabar, yang berkaitan dengan keterbatasan pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan metakognitif siswa. Guru juga menilai bahwa keterbatasan pelatihan dan fasilitas menjadi penghalang dalam penerapan CT. Walaupun pemahaman guru terhadap CT masih terbatas, seluruh responden (100%) sepakat bahwa CT relevan untuk mendukung pembelajaran matematika yang lebih kontekstual. Guru menyarankan pelatihan berkelanjutan, penyediaan sarana pembelajaran, dan penerapan model berdiferensiasi berbasis hambatan belajar. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa keberhasilan integrasi CT bergantung pada dukungan kelembagaan dan penguatan kapasitas guru, sekaligus membuka peluang bagi penelitian selanjutnya mengenai pengembangan model pembelajaran berdiferensiasi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir komputasi siswa.

 Teachers’ Perceptions of Barriers in Mathematics Instruction and the Integration of Computational Thinking

 This study aims to identify teachers’ perceptions of the barriers in mathematics learning and the opportunities for integrating Computational Thinking (CT) at the secondary education level. The research involved seven mathematics teachers at SMP Negeri 6 Denpasar, representing diverse ages, teaching experiences, and educational backgrounds. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed using both closed- and open-ended questionnaires. Data were analyzed quantitatively through percentages and frequencies, and qualitatively through thematic analysis. The findings indicate that the majority of teachers (85.7%) reported significant barriers in abstract topics such as geometry and algebra, mainly due to students’ limited conceptual understanding and metacognitive skills. Teachers also highlighted the lack of training and facilities as major obstacles in implementing CT. Although teachers’ understanding of CT was limited, all respondents (100%) acknowledged its relevance for supporting more contextual mathematics instruction. Teachers recommended continuous training, the provision of adequate learning resources, and the application of differentiated learning models based on students’ learning barriers. These findings emphasize that the success of CT integration depends on institutional support and teacher capacity-building, while also providing a foundation for future research on developing differentiated learning models aimed at enhancing students’ computational thinking skills.

References

Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. N. (2020). Computational Thinking Education: Issues and Challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185

Ate?kan, A., & Ortaçtepe, D. (2021). Demystifying Computational Thinking for Teacher Candidates: A Case Study on Turkish Secondary School Pre-Service Teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6383–6399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10626-9

Baroudi, S., & Shaya, N. (2022). Exploring Predictors of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy for Online Teaching in the Arab World Amid COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 8093–8110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10946-4

Bush, J. B. (2021). Software?based Intervention With Digital Manipulatives to Support Student Conceptual Understandings of Fractions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2299–2318. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13139

Cahyana, C., & Agustin, M. (2024). Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Kelas: Perencanaan, Penerapan Dan Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran. Edukatif Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 844–851. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v6i1.5962

Cao, Y., Al-Kubaisy, Z. M., Stojanovi?, J., Deni?, N., Petkovi?, D., Zlatkovi?, D., & Zaki?, A. (2022). Appraisal of Information and Communications Technologies on the Teaching Process by Neuro Fuzzy Logic. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(3), 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22486

Çoksa??r, B. S., & Aslan, D. (2021). Effect of Coding Activities on Preschool Children’s Mathematical Reasoning Skills. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 877–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10618-9

Corey, D. L., Williams, S. R., Monroe, E. E., & Wagner, M. (2020). Teachers’ Knowledge of Student Mathematical Thinking in Written Instructional Products. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(6), 613–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09476-y

Dolgopolovas, V., & Dagien?, V. (2024). Competency?based TPACK Approaches to Computational Thinking and Integrated STEM: A Conceptual Exploration. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22788

González, G., Cepeda, W. V., & Hernández-Rodríguez, O. (2021). Leveraging Prospective Teachers’ Knowledge Through Their Participation in Lesson Study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09521-4

Hu, X., Zuo, H., Lai, C., Zhu, G., Guo, J., & Tan, H. (2023). Is Social Media Use for Math Learning Beneficial for Ethnic Minority Students’ Math Identity? A Socialization Perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13359

Kong, S. C., & Lai, M. (2021). Computational Identity and Programming Empowerment of Students in Computational Thinking Development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 668–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13175

Livy, S., Muir, T., Trakulphadetkrai, N. V., & Larkin, K. (2021). Australian Primary School teachers’ Perceived Barriers to and Enablers for the Integration of Children’s Literature in Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09517-0

Malik, R., Abdi, D., Wang, R., & Demszky, D. (2025). Scaffolding Middle School Mathematics Curricula With Large Language Models. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(3), 999–1027. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13571

POÇAN, S., Altay, B., & Ya?aro?lu, C. (2022). The Effects of Mobile Technology on Learning Performance and Motivation in Mathematics Education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11166-6

Shidiq, H. A., Zakaria, A., & Nasution, H. (2024). Analysis of Sustainability Report Disclosure and Sustainability Performance in Energy, Oil, and Gas Cluster BUMN Companies. Jbiar, 1(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.56442/s9q8z354

Sjöblom, M., Valero, P., & Olander, C. (2022). Teachers’ Noticing to Promote Students’ Mathematical Dialogue in Group Work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26(4), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09540-9

Wati, R. L., Muwakhidah, M., Ramadhany, K. A., Harnastiti, R., & Wulandari, C. (2023). Profil Resiliensi Akademik Siswa SMP Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Pedagogika Jurnal Pedagogika Dan Dinamika Pendidikan, 11(1), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.30598/pedagogikavol11issue1page120-125

Yadav, S., & Chakraborty, P. (2023). Introducing Schoolchildren to Computational Thinking Using Smartphone Apps: A Way to Encourage Enrollment in Engineering Education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(4), 831–849. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22609

Yurinova, E. A., Byrdina, O. G., & Dolzhenko, S. G. (2021). Transprofessional Competences of School Teachers in the Digital Environment: Education Employers’ Perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1841–1863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10687-w

Zhang, W., Guan, Y., & Hu, Z. (2024). The Efficacy of Project-Based Learning in Enhancing Computational Thinking Among Students: A Meta-Analysis of 31 Experiments and Quasi-Experiments. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11), 14513–14545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12392-2

Zulkhi, M. D., & Jannah, M. (2022). Perbandingan Permainan Modern Dan Permainan Tradisional Terhadap Muatan Pembelajaran IPS Di Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Basic Education Research, 2(2), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.37251/jber.v2i2.196

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Juliangkary, E., Suparta, I. N., Ardana, I. M., & Mahayukti, G. A. (2025). Persepsi Guru terhadap Hambatan Pembelajaran Matematika dan Integrasi Computational Thinking. Reflection Journal, 5(2), 699-708. https://doi.org/10.36312/rj.v5i2.3218

Similar Articles

1-10 of 112

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.