The Efficacy of Process-Tracing Technologies for Supporting Academic Writing Instruction: A Lesson Learned from Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v3i2.1343Keywords:
process-based approcah, technology, academic writingAbstract
Writing-process research has undergone a transformative shift from relying on methods that were impractical for classroom settings, such as direct or video-based observations and concurrent verbal reports, to adopting less-obtrusive techniques like keystroke logging and eye tracking. The latter methods have become increasingly feasible due to the resolution of software and cost-related concerns, making them more accessible for pedagogical applications. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy of process-tracing technology for supporting academic writing instruction at a middle school in Vietnam. To carry out the research process, the researchers applied qualitative study. The participants in this study comprise a group of learners attending a middle school in Vietnam. Their involvement in the research revolves around the meticulous tracing of their writing process as they engage in the production of argumentative texts, with a particular focus on the utilization of technology during this endeavor. Data collection involved the application of both interviews and observations to gather comprehensive insights into the phenomenon under investigation. The findings of the study showed that process-tracing technology is able to help teachers and learners to control their academic writing achievement. The conclusion showed that the integration of process-tracing technology, combining keystroke logging and eye tracking, has proven to be a highly effective and valuable tool for supporting academic writing.
Downloads
References
Abbas, M. F. F., & Herdi, H. (2018). Solving the Students’ Problems in Writing Argumentative Essay Through Collaborative Writing Strategy. English Review: Journal of English Education, 7(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i1.1499
Al Zumor, A. Q. (2021). Stance in Advanced Academic Writing by Saudi EFL Postgraduates: A Corpus-Based Study of Critique Writing. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(4), 371. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i4.4288
Al- Zyoud, A., Al Jamal, D., & Baniabdelrahman, A. (2017). Mind Mapping and Students’ Writing Performance. Arab World English Journal, 8(4), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no4.19
Alghasab, M. B. (2020). Flipping the Writing Classroom: Focusing on the Pedagogical Benefits and EFL Learners’ Perceptions. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 28. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p28
Alkhataba, E. H. A., Abdul-Hamid, S., & Ibrahim, B. (2018). Technology-Supported Online Writing: An Overview of Six Major Web 2.0 Tools for Collaborative-Online Writing. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3151131
Astiantih, S., & Akfan, S. S. (2023). Utilizing Concept Maps to Enhance Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(3), 433. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i3.7993
Azis, Y. A., & Husnawadi, H. (2020). Collaborative Digital Storytelling-based Task for EFL Writing Instruction: Outcomes and Perceptions. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 17(2), 562–579. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.2.16.562
Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2020). Conceptualizing self-regulated reading-to-write in ESL/EFL writing and investigating its relationships to motivation and writing competence. Language Teaching Research, 136216882097174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820971740
Bakla, A. (2020). A mixed-methods study of feedback modes in EFL writing. Language Learning, 24(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10125/44712
Balgopal, M. M., & Wallace, A. M. (2009). Decisions and Dilemmas: Using Writing to Learn Activities to Increase Ecological Literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.3.13-26
Barrot, J. S. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: Impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(3), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2016.1143481
Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100671
Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.). (2012). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768.pub2
Chapelle, C. A., Cotos, E., & Lee, J. (2015). Validity arguments for diagnostic assessment using automated writing evaluation. Language Testing, 32(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214565386
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th Edition). New York: Routledge.
Cordeiro, C., Castro, S. L., & Limpo, T. (2018). Examining Potential Sources of Gender Differences in Writing: The Role of Handwriting Fluency and Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Written Communication, 35(4), 448–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318788843
Curwood, J. S., Lammers, J. C., & Magnifico, A. M. (2017). From Research to Practice: Writing, Technology, and English Teacher Education. In H. L. Hallman (Ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching (Vol. 27, pp. 121–141). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-368720170000027007
Daniel, R. B., & Christopher, J. (2018). The Effects of Online Collaborative Writing and TOEIC Writing Test- Preparation on L2 Writing Performance. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 15(2), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.8.383
Dari, R. W., Rahmawati, E., & Akhiriyah, S. (2022). An Analysis of Writing Strategies Used by Students of English Language Department. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5413
de Kleine, C., & Lawton, R. (2018). An analysis of grammatical patterns in generation 1.5, L1 and L2 students’ writings: A replication study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.10.003
Del Campo, R., Buchanan, W. R., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2015). Levels of phonology related to reading and writing in middle childhood. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9520-5
Dwigustini, R., Sari, N., Susilawati, S., & Nisa, B. (2021). Fostering Students’ Writing Skill by the Integration of Mall Application. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i1.3264
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2016). Supporting Second Language Writing Using Multimodal Feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12183
Erickson, E. (2022). An Analysis of Writers’ Errors in Producing Descriptive Texts; Intercultural Studies. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 444. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5389
Fadli, K., Irawan, L. A., & Haerazi, H. (2022). English Teachers’ Feedback on Students’ Writing Work in the New Normal Era: Teachers’ Feedback; Writing Skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v1i2.624
Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020). Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775
Fatiani, T. A., Rahman, A., & Jupri, J. (2021). Practicing Cooperative Learning Model Using Picture Cube and Story Marker to Improve Writing Skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v1i1.500
Fauzan, A., & Ngabut, M. N. (2018). EFL Students’ Perception on Flipped Learning in Writing Class. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 8(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v8i2.792
Hadi, M. S., Izzah, L., & Putra, A. D. (2021). Analysis of the Use of Banksy Image in Improving Students’ Writing Skill. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(4), 519. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i4.4005
Hadi, M. S., & Karyadi, A. N. (2023). Can Social Media-Style Fanfiction Stories Enrich Students’ Narrative Writing Mastery? Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.5814
Haerazi, H., & Irawan, L. A. (2019). Practicing Genre-Based Language Teaching Model to Improve Students’ Achievement of Writing Skills. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 4(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i1.246
Haerazi, H., & Irawan, L. A. (2020). Developing Intercultural Language Learning (ILL) model to teach writing skills at Indonesian private universities. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 5(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.30659/e.5.1.43-54
Haerazi, H., & Kazemian, M. (2021). Self-Regulated Writing Strategy as a Moderator of Metacognitive Control in Improving Prospective Teachers’ Writing Skills. 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.36312/ejolls.v1i1.498
Haerazi, H., Utama, I. M. P., & Hidayatullah, H. (2020). Mobile Applications to Improve English Writing Skills Viewed from Critical Thinking Ability for Pre-Service Teachers. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 14(07), 58. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i07.11900
Kazemian, M., Irawan, L. A., & Haerazi, H. (2021). Developing Metacognitive Writing Strategy to Enhance Writing Skills Viewed from Prospective Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(1), 14.
Labinaz, P., & Sbisà, M. (2018). Argumentation as a dimension of discourse: The case of news articles. Pragmatics & Cognition, 25(3), 602–630. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18024.lab
Lating, A. Z. Y. (2022). The Improvement of the Students’ Ability in Writing Procedure Text Using Video Recipe. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 461. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5328
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2016). Quantitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third). Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
Naghdipour, B. (2022). ICT-enabled informal learning in EFL writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 56, 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100893
Plakans, L., Liao, J.-T., & Wang, F. (2019). “I should summarize this whole paragraph”: Shared processes of reading and writing in iterative integrated assessment tasks. Assessing Writing, 40, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.003
Rachmaida, F., & Mutiarani, M. (2022). The Use of Spinning Wheel Games to Improve Students’ Writing Procedural Texts. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(4), 530. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i4.5766
Rafida, T. (2017). The Integration of Vocabulary and Effective Sentence Mastery towards Students’ Argumentative Writing Skills. Register Journal, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v10i1.1-11
Rahmawati, F. S., Cahyono, B. Y., & Anugerahwati, M. (2018). Effect of story maps on EFL students’ achievement in writing narrative texts. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 8(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v8i2.877
Roderick, R. (2019). Self-Regulation and Rhetorical Problem Solving: How Graduate Students Adapt to an Unfamiliar Writing Project. Written Communication, 36(3), 410–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319843511
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas: Writing to Learn by Learning to Write in Science. Science Education, 97(5), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21069
Sharma, D. (2022). Making Meaningful Connections and Learning Workplace-Like Business Writing Through LinkedIn and Blogging. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 85(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221109188
Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: A case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
Sumarsono, D., & Permana, D. (2023). Contract Learning as Individualized Instructional Strategies in Improving Students’ Performance in Academic Writing Courses. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6683
Susilawati, S. (2023). Integrating Content and Language to Teach ESP Writing Online with the Assistance of Google Docs. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6617
Troyan, F. J. (2016). Learning to Mean in Spanish Writing: A Case Study of a Genre-Based Pedagogy for Standards-Based Writing Instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12192
Wahid, J. H., & Sudirman, S. (2023). The Effect of Mind Mapping Technique on Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6692
Wismanto, A., Suyoto, S., & Ulumuddin, A. (2022). Developing an Instruction Model for News Writing Based on the Cooperatif Type Group Investigation Strategy. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i2.4956
Wu, W.-C. V., Yang, J. C., Scott Chen Hsieh, J., & Yamamoto, T. (2020). Free from Demotivation in EFL Writing: The Use of Online Flipped Writing Instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(4), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1567556
Xianwei, G., Samuel, M., & Asmawi, A. (2016). A Model Of Critical Peer Feedback To Facilitate Business English Writing Using Qzone Weblogs Among Chinese Undergraduates. 4, 17. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet
Yoon, S. Y., & Kim, N.-Y. (2022). The Use of Metadiscourse Markers in Mobile-Assisted Flipped Learning in L2 Writing. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 19(1), 180–196. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2022.19.1.11.180
Yundayani, A. (2018). Present Situation Analysis: Students’ Early Characteristics in Writing for Academic Purposes. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v6i2.1262
Zabihi, R. (2018). The Role of Cognitive and Affective Factors in Measures of L2 Writing. Written Communication, 35(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735836
Zhang, H., Southam, A., Fanguy, M., & Costley, J. (2021). Understanding how embedded peer comments affect student quiz scores, academic writing and lecture note-taking accuracy. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2021-0011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Huang Yen Wang, Sammy Q. Dolba, Alex Zamorano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JoLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JoLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors give permission to the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agrees to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
