Character Narratives in Indonesian Digital Fiction: A Semi-Digital Stylistics Approach

Authors

  • Nensy Megawati Simanjuntak Universitas Dr. Soetomo
  • Sarah Prather Madison College
  • Arumtyas Puspitaning Padmasari Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Dedy Setyawan University of Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Victor MTL Tobing University of Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v4i4.2299

Keywords:

Digital fiction , Narrative characterization , Literature analysis , Stylistic approach

Abstract

Digital fiction is a collection of art texts in the form of short stories and novels that combine technology, virtual space, media elements, and provide access to readers or netizens to carry out certain activities in it. Narratology of Characterization is the initial foundation in research in the field of literary studies. Narratology is a field of study that explains narratives and narrative structures in a discourse context. Narratology of characterization talks about the position or scheme of characters in the story. The position of the character talks about the role and impact of the role of the character. The character gives birth to characterization. Characterization gives birth to implications. Implications provides birth to messages and perspectives that will be captured by the reader. Narratology research in digital fiction is research that aims to explain the position, role, and function of the character and characterization itself. This study found that in digital fiction, characters are dominated by women. Female characters in digital fiction hold various roles and impacts on the roles they play. Not only that, this study also found that all works included in the digital fiction category are works that are ready to be owned by many people. Digital fiction does not only belong to the author but also to the reader who acts as a ghost writer who has the right to make decisions or provide suggestions and criticisms of the contents of the story. The author is still recognized as the creator of the story and netizens still take their position as figures who assess the work subjectively and objectively, subjective because there are thoughts, ideas, personal points of view in assessing a fiction, objective in providing assessments, input, suggestions, and criticisms for the maturity or goodness of the story.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nensy Megawati Simanjuntak, Universitas Dr. Soetomo

Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia

Sarah Prather, Madison College

2Student Consultant, Madison College, United States of America

Arumtyas Puspitaning Padmasari, Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

1Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia

Dedy Setyawan, University of Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia

Victor MTL Tobing, University of Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia

References

Abrams, M. H. (1976). The mirror and the lamp: Romantic theory and the critical tradition. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Afifuddin. (2009). Qualitative research methodology. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Aminuddin. (1995). Stylistics: An introduction to understanding language in literary works. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Afifah, & Zufitria. (2008). Persepsi manusia terhadap tanda, simbol, dan spasial. SMARTek, 6(1).

Agitha. (2013). A semiotic analysis of the A Mild Go A Head commercial version “Dorong Bangunan” on television. Acta Diurna, 1(1).

Agung, A., & Kurnia, K. (2017). Media sosial Instagram sebagai sarana sosialisasi kebijakan penyiaran digital. ASPIKOM, 3(2).

Anggoro, T. (2008). Research methodology. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Afifah, & Zufitria. (2008). Persepsi manusia terhadap tanda, simbol, dan spasial. SMARTek, 6(1).

Agitha, A. (2013). A semiotic analysis of the A Mild Go A Head commercial version “Dorong Bangunan” on television. Acta Diurna, 1(1).

Agung, & Kurnia. (2017). Media sosial Instagram sebagai sarana sosialisasi kebijakan penyiaran digital. ASPIKOM, 3(2).

Bambang, & Emilsyah. (2013). Semiotika dalam metode penelitian komunikasi. PEKOMMAS, 16(1).

Barthes, R. (1972). Membedah mitos-mitos budaya massa. Jakarta: Jalasutra.

Bal, M. (1993). First person, second person, same person: Narrative as epistemology. New Literary History, 24(2), 293–320.

Berg, L. (2014). Little Red Riding Hood 2.0. Humboldt Kosmos, 102, 12–23.

Berry, D. M. (2015). The computational turn: Thinking about the digital humanities. CultureMachine, 12(1), 1–22.

Berry, D. M. (Ed.). (2012). Understanding digital humanities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Best, S., & Marcus, S. (2009). Surface reading: An introduction. Representations, 108, 1–21.

Bimo-Mahendra. (2017). Eksistensi sosial remaja dalam Instagram (Perspektif komunikasi). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 16(1), 157–160.

Black, E. (2016). Pragmatic stylistics. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press.

Bogdan, R., & Taylor, J. S. (1993). Qualitative methods: Basic research. Surabaya: National Business.

Booker, C. (2004). The seven basic plots: Why we tell stories. London: Continuum.

Bradford, R. (1997). Stylistics. London: New Fetter Lane.

Bressler, C. E. (1999). Literary criticism: An introduction to theory and practice (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Büchner, G. (1971). Danton’s death (H. J. Schmidt, Trans.). New York: Avon Books.

Bürger, P. (1984). Theory of the avant-garde. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Child, P., & Fowler, R. (2006). The Routledge dictionary of literary terms. London and New York: Routledge.

Courtès, J. (1989). Sémantique de l’énoncé: Applications pratiques. Paris: Hachette.

Crane, G. (2015). What do you do with a million books? D-Lib Magazine, 12(3).

Crystal, D. (2000). New perspectives of language study 1: Stylistics University of Reading: Department of Linguistics Science.

Curtius, E. R. (2013). European literature and the Latin Middle Ages (W. R. Trask, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Curtès, J. (1993). Sémiotique narrative et discursive-méthodologie et applications. Paris: Hachette.

Davis, K. (2003). Dubious equalities and embodied differences: Studies on cosmetic surgery. Lanham, MA: Rowan & Littlefield.

Darwis, M. (2002). Pola-pola gramatikal dalam puisi Indonesia. Jurnal Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia, 20(1).

Davies, A., & Elder, C. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of applied linguistics. Australia: Blackwell Publishing.

Dewi, S. (2014). Efomenologi mengurai disekulibirium relasi manusia dengan alam. Tangerang: Margin Kiri.

Dilthey, W. (1923). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie (G. Misch, Ed.). Gesammelte Werke, Vol. 5.

Djoko-Saryono. (2009). Dasar apresiasi sastra. Elmatera Publikasi.

Djoko-Saryono. (2015). Menuju era multidispliner dalam kajian bahasa dan sastra Indonesia.

Djoko-Saryono. (2017). Construction of visual features of Indonesian digital poetry. International Journal of Linguistics, Language and Culture (IJLLC).

Djoko-Saryono. (2017). Paradigma estetika dan etika novel Indonesia setelah kurun waktu 2000-an. Retrieved from http://www.pelangisastramalang.org/2017/03/14/esai-djoko-saryono-paradigma-estetika-dan-etika-novel-indonesia-setelah-kurun-tahun-2000-an/

Djoko-Saryono. (2017). Pentingnya pengajaran sastra di era digital. Malang: UNIKAMA. Retrieved from https://unikama.ac.id/id/pentingnya-pengajaran-sastra-di-era-digital/

Djoko-Saryono. (2020). Era digital: Sastra pada digital dan spesies sastra digital. Sastra Indonesia. Retrieved from http://sastra-indonesia.com/2020/11/era-digital-sastra-pada-era-digital-dan-spesies-sastra-digital-4/

Edmundson, M. (2009). Against readings. Profession, 56–65.

Fabb, N. (2003). Linguistics and literature. In M. Arnoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 223–243). USA: Blackwell Publisher.

Fiske, J. Cultural and communication studies: An introduction.

Fish, S. (2015). The old order changeth. Opinionator Blog. New York Times Company.

Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Gold, M. K. (Ed.). (2012). Debates in the digital humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Goldstone, A., & Underwood, T. (2014). The quiet transformations of literary studies: What thirteen thousand scholars could tell us. New Literary History, 45, 359–384.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-10

How to Cite

Simanjuntak, N. M., Sarah Prather, Padmasari, A. P., Setyawan, D., & Tobing, V. M. (2024). Character Narratives in Indonesian Digital Fiction: A Semi-Digital Stylistics Approach. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 4(4), 975–982. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v4i4.2299

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.