Enhancing Academic Writing through Digital Tools: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v4i4.2342Keywords:
digital tools, academic writing, digital literacy, AI-based writing assistantsAbstract
The integration of digital tools in academic writing has significantly enhanced students' writing proficiency across various educational levels. Tools such as grammar checkers, citation managers, plagiarism detectors, and collaborative platforms help students produce more structured, academically compliant writing. These tools support technical skill development while also increasing educational accessibility, providing students from diverse backgrounds with greater opportunities to improve their writing abilities. AI-based writing assistants, in particular, help reduce grammatical errors and expand vocabulary, while multimodal technologies encourage creativity by enabling students to integrate visual and audio elements into their work. This literature review, using PRISMA and bibliometric analysis, synthesizes studies from 2019 to 2024, examining how digital tools impact writing clarity, adherence to academic standards, and structured argumentation. The review reveals that while digital tools significantly enhance writing skills, their overuse can result in a dependency that impairs the development of critical thinking and creativity—key components of strong writing. The implications of these findings stress the importance of digital literacy training within curricula, ensuring that students use digital tools responsibly and complement their writing skills with analytical and creative thinking. Additionally, professional development for educators is essential, enabling them to guide students in effectively integrating these tools. Ultimately, a balanced approach to digital tool use can enhance academic writing while contributing to the broader goal of fostering well-rounded, digitally literate learners.
Downloads
References
Aksela, O., Lämsä, J., & Järvelä, S. (2024). Secondary School Students’ Enacted Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in a Computer-Based Writing Task–Insights from Digital Trace Data and Interviews. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-30.
Benetos, K. (2023). Digital Tools for Written Argumentation. In Digital Writing Technologies in Higher Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 81-99). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Burns, T., Sinfield, S., & Abegglen, S. (2023). Postdigital Academic Writing. In Encyclopedia of Postdigital Science and Education (pp. 1-7). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Camacho, A., Alves, R. A., & Boscolo, P. (2021). Writing motivation in school: A systematic review of empirical research in the early twenty-first century. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 213-247.
Demi?rba?, ?., & ?ahi?n, A. (2023). The effect of digital stories on primary school students’ creative writing skills. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 7997-8025.
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622.
Dja'far, V. H., & Hamidah, F. N. (2024). The Effectiveness of AI Technology in Improving Academic English Writing Skills in Higher Education. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 4(3), 579-593.
Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing Assistant's impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055.
Garcés-Manzanera, A. (2024). Language bursts and text quality in digital writing by young EFL learners. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 13(1), 12.
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277-303.
Guo, K., & Li, D. (2024). Understanding EFL students’ use of self-made AI chatbots as personalized writing assistance tools: A mixed methods study. System, 124, 103362.
Gustilo, L., Ong, E., & Lapinid, M. R. (2024). Algorithmically-driven writing and academic integrity: exploring educators' practices, perceptions, and policies in AI era. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 3.
Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., & McGuinness, L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18, e1230. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1230
Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100710.
Kim, Y., Kang, S., Nam, Y., & Skalicky, S. (2022). Peer interaction, writing proficiency, and the quality of collaborative digital multimodal composing task: Comparing guided and unguided planning. System, 106, 102722.
Lin, Z. (2024). Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 1-6.
Link, S., Cotos, E., & Dinca, A. (2023). Towards Defining Digital Writing Quality. In Digital Writing Technologies in Higher Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 435-445). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
McNaughton, S., & Jesson, R. (2023). How a digital intervention in schools contributed to students’ social and emotional skills, and impacted writing. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 58(2), 361-377.
Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5).
Odo, D. M. (2024). Using Writing Editor Tools to Improve English Writing Skills. In Technology and English Language Teaching in a Changing World: A Practical Guide for Teachers and Teacher Educators (pp. 143-155). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2024). Detection of GPT-4 generated text in higher education: Combining academic judgement and software to identify generative AI tool misuse. Journal of Academic Ethics, 22(1), 89-113.
Pitura, J. (2023). Digital Note-Taking for Writing. In Digital Writing Technologies in Higher Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 101-119). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Purser, E., Dreyfus, S., & Jones, P. (2020). Big ideas & sharp focus: Researching and developing students’ academic writing across the disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 100807.
Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131, 33-48.
Wang, C., Li, Z., & Bonk, C. (2024). Understanding Self-Directed Learning in AI-Assisted Writing: A Mixed Methods Study of Postsecondary Learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 100247.
Wang, Y. (2024). Cognitive and sociocultural dynamics of self-regulated use of machine translation and generative AI tools in academic EFL writing. System, 126, 103505.
Williams, C., & Beam, S. (2019). Technology and writing: Review of research. Computers & Education, 128, 227-242.
Wu, T. T., Silitonga, L. M., & Murti, A. T. (2024). Enhancing English writing and higher-order thinking skills through computational thinking. Computers & Education, 213, 105012.
Zhang, R., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2025). Flow in ChatGPT-based logic learning and its influences on logic and self-efficacy in English argumentative writing. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, 108457.
Zhao, D. (2024). The impact of AI-enhanced natural language processing tools on writing proficiency: an analysis of language precision, content summarization, and creative writing facilitation. Education and Information Technologies, 1-32.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Risca Ariska Ramadhan, Abdul Rahim, Darmanto, Atika Salman Paris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
