Morpho-Syntactic Errors in EFL Students’ Writing: A Lesson from Language Education Institutions

Authors

  • Zainul Fajrin Universitas Tadulako
  • Konder Manurung Universitas Tadulako
  • Siska Bochari Universitas Tadulako
  • Hastini Hastini Universitas Tadulako
  • Ahmad Javed Hassan University of Baltistan, Sakrdu, Gilgit-Baltistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i1.2505

Keywords:

Error analysis, Morphosyntactic analysis, Morphology, Syntax, Writing skills

Abstract

Many students struggle with writing in English due to linguistic challenges such as morphology and syntax. This research aimed at discovering the morpho-syntactic errors that EFL students did and the most dominant error in the fifth-semester students in the English Education Study Program at Tadulako University. The researcher used descriptive quantitative method as the design of the research to analyze common morpho-syntactic error in on the students’ writings and to discover the errors and the most dominant errors made by students. The participants of this research were 145 students which chosen using simple random sampling where the researcher picked sample members from a population at random, without worrying about different groups or layers within that population. Data for this study were gathered through tests and the researcher analyzed using Dulay’s linguistic category taxonomy. The results of the study showed that errors are found at both morphological and syntactical levels. The morphological level included pronoun error, quantifier error, and inflectional error. Meanwhile, the syntactical level included tense error, infinitive error, auxiliary verb error and subject-verb agreement error. However, from all those errors, the most dominant error was pronoun error with the total number of errors was 504 in frequency. It implied that students lacked of understanding the use of pronouns in sentences. The research findings have important implications for both pedagogical approach and linguistic competence. For pedagogical approach, the insights help students understand and correct common grammar errors, improving their writing skills and boosting their confidence. In terms of linguistic competence, the findings highlight EFL students' development in morphology and syntax, enabling them to construct grammatically correct sentences and master complex language structures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Zainul Fajrin, Universitas Tadulako

English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM9, Tondo, Sulawesi Tengah, Universitas Tadulako

Konder Manurung, Universitas Tadulako

English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM9, Tondo, Sulawesi Tengah, Universitas Tadulako

Siska Bochari, Universitas Tadulako

English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM9, Tondo, Sulawesi Tengah, Universitas Tadulako

Hastini Hastini, Universitas Tadulako

English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Jl. Soekarno Hatta KM9, Tondo, Sulawesi Tengah, Universitas Tadulako

Ahmad Javed Hassan, University of Baltistan, Sakrdu, Gilgit-Baltistan

Department of English, University of Baltistan, Sakrdu, Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

References

Al Zumor, A. Q. (2021). Stance in Advanced Academic Writing by Saudi EFL Postgraduates: A Corpus-Based Study of Critique Writing. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(4), 371. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i4.4288

Al-zubeiry, H. (2020). An Analysis of Morpho-Syntactic Errors of Addition Produced by Saudi EFL Learners. Journal of Human Sciences, 2, 1–15.

Aronoff, M., & Fudeman, K. (2022). What is Morphology? (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing. website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell.

Astiantih, S., & Akfan, S. S. (2023). Utilizing Concept Maps to Enhance Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(3), 433. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i3.7993

Bowers, P. N., & Kirby, J. R. (2010). Effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary acquisition. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9172-z

Dari, R. W., Rahmawati, E., & Akhiriyah, S. (2022). An Analysis of Writing Strategies Used by Students of English Language Department. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5413

Desnaranti, L. (2017). Morphological and Syntactical Error Analysis on Students’ Procedure Text Writings. Journal of English Language Teaching, 01(02), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v1i02.1121

Eunson, B. (2020). Communicating in the 21st Century. The Journal of Irreproducible Results, 1–149.

Fortuna, A. Z. (2023). Analysis of the common Morpho-Syntactic Errors in the written English Language of the Form Three Students in Public Secondary Schools in Lang’ata Sub-County, Nairobi County. 1–67.

Ilham, I. (2024). Needs Analysis of Project-Based Learning Model in Writing Paragraphs from EFL Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(1), 282. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i1.9215

Ismiati, I., & Fitria, I. L. (2021). Combining Diary and Guided Strategies for Writing Difficulties. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 9(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v9i1.3096

Lieber, R. (2021). Introducing Morphology. Ccambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316156254

Muin, F. (2021). An Introduction to Linguistics.

Najia, A. U., & Sutikno, P. Y. (2024). Virtual Field Trips Borobudur Temple Assisted with Songs in Stimulating Writing Skills of Descriptive Texts. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1991. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.12450

Nielsen, A.-M. V., Daugaard, H. T., Scavenius, C., & Juul, H. (2022). Combining morphological and contextual strategy instruction to enhance word learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101920

Purinanda, F. H., & Sutrisno, A. (2022). Morphosyntax Errors in Undergraduate Research Articles from English Education Department. English Education:Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i1.17862

Putri, N., & Aminatun, D. (2021). Using Facebook To Practice Writing Skill: What Do the Students Think? Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v2i1.852

Rahayu, F. E. S. (2021). Introduction to English Morphology. Unmul Repository.

Setiawan, M. (2019). The Effectiveness of Learning By Teaching (LBT): A Case of Junior High School Students Studying Tenses. Humaniora, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v10i1.5038

Susanto, A. (2017). the Teaching of Vocabulary: a Perspective. Jurnal KATA, 1(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.22216/jk.v1i2.2136

Susanti, A., & Agung, E. L. (2023). Improving Students’ Writing Ability in Personal Recount Text Using Google Jamboard. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(4), 912. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.8520

Wahid, J. H., & Sudirman, S. (2023). The Effect of Mind Mapping Technique on Students’ Writing Skills. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6692

Wang, L., & Liu, D. (2020). The Role of Morphological Awareness in Reading Chinese Characters: The Moderating Effect of Morpheme Family Size. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1644338

Widiastuti, E., & Saefurrohman. (2021). The Effectiveness of Using Inductive Method to Improve the Students’ Understanding on Subject-verb Agreement. Journal of Appied Linguistics Indonesia (Aplinesia), 05(05), 23–27.

Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000154

Zaim, M. (2018). Shifting the System of Indonesian Word Formation; the Study on Morphology and Sociolinguistics of Acronyms, Blending, and Clipping. Humanus, 16(1), 248. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v16i2.8690

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

Fajrin, Z., Manurung, K., Bochari, S., Hastini, H., & Hassan, A. J. (2025). Morpho-Syntactic Errors in EFL Students’ Writing: A Lesson from Language Education Institutions. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 5(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i1.2505

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.