Challenging Misconceptions about Islam through Islamic English: An Assertive Speech Act Approach in Interfaith Dialogue
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i2.2646Keywords:
Assertive speech acts, Islamic English, Interfaith communication, Religious identity, Misconception correctionAbstract
Research has shown that interfaith dialogue is essential for fostering mutual understanding and peace among different religious communities, yet misconceptions and stereotypes, particularly about Islam, continue to hinder productive communication. The role of language, especially Islamic English, in bridging these gaps and facilitating accurate representations of Islam remains underexplored in the context of interfaith dialogue. This study investigates the role of Islamic English in addressing these misconceptions by analyzing its use through the framework of assertive speech acts. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, the study examines a publicly available YouTube video of an interfaith dialogue conference titled "Islam, Judaism, and Christianity – A Conversation", hosted by SMAADallas. A total of 135 occurrences of Islamic English terms were identified and analyzed based on their frequency, meanings, and pragmatic functions. The qualitative phase applies assertive speech act analysis to explore how these terms reinforce Islamic identity, clarify religious concepts, and establish common ground with other faiths. The findings reveal that the Muslim speaker strategically employs Islamic English through assertive acts such as asserting, stating, denying, describing, and explaining to challenge stereotypes, correct misunderstandings, and assert Islamic theological and historical truths. The study highlights how Islamic English serves as a discursive strategy in interfaith communication, ensuring linguistic and theological accuracy while fostering mutual respect. Ultimately Islamic educators and interfaith dialogue practitioners can incorporate Islamic English strategically to clarify Islamic identity, correct misconceptions, engage diverse audiences, and promote mutual respect and peaceful coexistence in educational and interfaith settings.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S., & Matthes, J. (2017). Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. The International Communication Gazette, 79(3), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516656305
Akmal, S., Fitriah, & Zafirah, H. (2020). Illocutionary acts in religious discourse: The pragmatics of Nouman Ali Khan’s speeches. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 6(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v6i2.1938
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1986). Toward Islamic English. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Ali, H. M. B. M. (2007). Islamic terms in contemporary English. English Today 90, 23(2), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078407002064
Ali, H. M. B. M. (2014). Islamo-English: A variety of English for the ummah. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 2(3), 68–75.
Amin, K. (2005). The reliability of the traditional science of Hadith: A critical reconsideration. Al-Jami Ah Journal of Islamic Studies, 43(2), 255–281. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2005.432.255-281
Andrabi, A. A. (2023). The relevance of interfaith dialogue in Islamic perspective: bridging understanding and harmony. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 15(9), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.37896/JXAT15.9/32640
Ayyad, E. (2015). The holy city of Madina: Sacred space in early Islamic Arabia by Harry Munt. Journal of Islamic Studies, 26(3), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etv064
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Dipta, D., Karim, N. B. H. A., & Sholeh, A. S. (2024). Exploring illocutionary speech acts in Yasmin Mogahed’s dakwah videos: A pragmatic study. JlE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program, 5(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.47435/jle.v5i1.2884
Elimam, A. S. (2019). Media, translation and the construction of the Muslim image: A narrative perspective. International Journal of Comparative Literature & Translation Studies, 7(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.7n.2p.24
Faris, S. (2023). Exploring the divine message: Quranic studies in the context of Islamic scholarship. Dirasah: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v1i2.16
Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., & Kastenmüller, A. (2007). What do we think about Muslims? The validity of Westerners’ implicit theories about the associations between Muslims’ religiosity, religious identity, aggression potential, and attitudes toward terrorism. Group Process Intergroup Relat, 10(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207078697
Habib, M. S., Akhter, N., Ahmad, G., & Saleem, M. M. (2022). Challenges to inter-faith peace in pluralistic society: An appraisal of modern approaches for sustainability. Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 19(2), 1447–1457.
Hasan, M. M. (2014). Islam’s encounter with English and Ismail al-Faruqi’s concept of Islamic English: A postcolonial reading. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, 31(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v31i2.287
Jamil, M., Abbas, S. Z., Amir Al-Salami, A. A., Hussein Al-Khafaji, F. A., Saenko, N. R., & Ramírez-Coronel, A. A. (2023). Islamic teachings and religious brotherhood in the Islamic society. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 79(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8369
Jassem, Z. A. (1996). Islamic English: An applied linguistic perspective. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics from 9th Symposium on Theoritical and Applied Linguistics, 9, 269–276.
Klaina, M. (2024). The image of the Muslim woman in Western thought. LECTURES: Journal of Islamic and Education Studies, 3(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.58355/lectures.v3i2.89
Körs, A., Weisse, W., & Willaime, J. P. (2020). Introduction: Religious diversity and interreligious dialogue. In Religious Diversity and Interreligious Dialogue (pp. 1–17).
Latif, M. A. (2024). The identity of religion always comes Up: The war, the mass media and the reproduction of Muslim identity in the West. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min, 14, 201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-024-01354-2
Mabaquiao, N. M. J. (2018). Speech act theory: From Austin to Searle. Augustinian: A Journal for Humanities, Social Sciences, Business, and Education, 19(1), 35–45.
Marzouki, Y., Barach, E., Srinivasan, V., Shaikh, S., & Feldman, L. B. (2020). The dynamics of negative stereotypes as revealed by tweeting behavior in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack. Heliyon, 6(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04311
Maskuri, S. K. D. S. (2024). The assertive illocutionary act of Khatib’ Islam preacher’ in Friday sermons in Baiturohim Mosque of Surakarta. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 6(2), 206–266. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v6i2.206-226
Mohamad, D. S. M. (1996). Islam the misunderstood religion. Jati, 2, 1–10.
Munt, H. (2014). The holy city of Madina: Sacred space in early Islamic Arabia. Cambridge University Press.
Nong, N. F. M., Idris, M. R., Zakaria, W. F. A. W., & Nor, A. Y. M. (2022). Relationship between Islamic identity, spirituality and religiosity in social identification. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(6), 1232–1243. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i6/13915
Nurlathifah, T. B. (2021). Contribution of Islam in the world (case study of Islamic education transmission). International Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 1–10.
OIC. (2015). Eight OIC observatory report on Islamophobia.
Onuoha, I. O., & Odeke, F. C. (2020). Globalization and religion: Analysing the impact. East African Journal of Traditions, Culture and Religion, 2(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.37284/eajtcr.2.1.213
Othman, K., & Ismail, A. I. (2018). Islamic English in Islamic talks. MATEC Web of Conferences, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005081
Possamai, A., Turner, B. S., Roose, J. M., Dagistanli, S., & Voyce, M. (2013). Defining the conversation about Shari’a: Representations in Australian newspapers. Current Sociology, 61, 626–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113488486
Rahman, S. U., Mohmand, S. S. S., & Ahmed, I. (2022). Sharia law-the West engulfed in a frenzy of fear. Pak. Journal of Int’L Affairs, 5(3), 441–451. https://doi.org/10.52337/pjia.v5i3.603
Rao, P. S. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research Journal Of English (RJOE), 4(1), 65–79.
Riaz, M., Baloch, F., Siddiqui, M., & Bashir, M. (2023). The role of Islamic education in promoting peace and tolerance. Al-Qantara, 9(4), 307–327.
Rosidah, U., Faridi, & Tobroni. (2024). Interfaith dialogue in Islamic religious education. JKPI: Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 120–133.
Saleh, M. I. (2002). A dictionary of Islamic words and expressions (2nd ed.). Al-Jumuah Magazine.
Saragih, H. M., Surya, E. H. P., & Islamiah, S. N. (2020). Indonesia’s effort to improve Islamic images in the United States during 2009-2017: A case study of interfaith dialogue. AJIS: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v5i1.1351
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
?entürk, R. (2002). Adamiyyah and ‘Ismah: The contested relationship between humanity and human rights in classical Islamic law. ?slam Ara?t?rrmalari Dergisi, 8, 39–69.
Siahaya, J., Ibnu, S., Siddiq, A., Murdo, I. T., & Nafi, M. (2023). Interfaith dialogue in the context of globalization: The role of religion in international diplomacy. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(4), 851–864.
Steingass, F. (1884). The student’s Arabic-English dictionary. Crosby Lockwood and Son.
Triyoko, H. (2014). Islamic English: The case in English teaching-learning in Indonesia. International Conference on Language and Religion, 88–106.
Visser, H. J., Liefbroer, A. I., & Schoonmade, L. J. (2023). Evaluating the learning outcomes of interfaith initiatives: A systematic literature review. Journal of Belief and Values, 45(4), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2023.2196486
Widodo, A. P., & Alatas, A. (2023). In awe of the holy city: Mecca in the eyes of five medieval travellers. IIUM Journal of Religion and Civilisational Studies, 6(2), 183–159. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijrcs.v6i2.298
Wijana, I. D. P. (2021). On speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics Research, 3(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.18326/jopr.v3i1.14-27
Yousaf, M., Sial, N., Munawar, A., & Shahzad, M. (2020). Stereotype of Islam and Muslims in Hollywood movies: An analysis of representation. The Scholar Islamic Academic Research Journal, 6(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.29370/siarj/issue10ar9
Yu, F. L. T., & Kwan, D. S. (2024). Competing Orthodoxy in the Islamic world: Sunnis versus Shi’as. In Perspectives on Development in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region (pp. 45–59). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62739-2_4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Zulfah, Hanung Triyoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
