Determinants of Willingness to Communicate among Secondary EFL Learners: A Case Study Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i2.2713Keywords:
English Instruction, Secondary students, Classroom interaction, Willingness to communicateAbstract
A key component of language learning is increasing learners' willingness to communicate (WTC), which is the main objective of second language (L2) instruction. In this study, students' perceptions of the aspects affecting their desire to communicate in an EFL (English as a Foreign Language) classroom were investigated. Four secondary students participated in semi-structured interviews to collect data for a qualitative case study. They were chosen due to their varied backgrounds in English: two students had prior learning experience and received rich exposure to English, and the other two did not. The selection of students was based on the need to obtain more detailed data. Data were examined with thematic analysis. The results of this study indicated that students exposed to English earlier are more willing to communicate. It clarifies the significant impact of early exposure to English has on students' preparedness for a more challenging learning environment. Additionally, personal factors like motivation, linguistic aspects, classroom environment, and task design contributed to students’ willingness to communicate in English classrooms. Recognizing these factors is crucial since they influence students' involvement and communicative practice, both of which are vital to language learning. Lastly, these findings suggest the importance of fostering supportive classroom environments and tailoring instructional strategies to diverse learner needs, offering valuable insights for EFL educators.
Downloads
References
Abebe, D. T. (2024). EFL students’ WTC across communicative situations in an instructional context: a quantitative study with focus on a public university in Ethiopia. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 12(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2024-0004
Aberdeen, T. (2013). Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(1), 69–71. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73
Al-Murtadha, M., & Feryok, A. (2017). Studying English in Yemen: situated unwillingness to communicate in sociohistorical time. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(3), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1317258
Amalia, S. N., Asib, A., & Marmanto, S. (2019). Indonesian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate in the instructional context. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 4(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v4i2.167
Amalia, S. N., Nurisma, R. A., Widiati, U., & Prihandoko, L. A. (2023). Learners’ agency, beliefs, mindsets and teacher autonomy as predictors of willingness to communicate in online learning. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language--TESL-EJ, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107a3
Andika, E. C. H., Fardhani, A. E., & Wahjuningsih, E. (2022). Factors affecting senior high school students’ willingness to communicate in English in the EFL classroom. EFL Education Journal, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.19184/eej.v9i1.30717
Auliyah, Z., & Sujannah, W. D. (2023). Factors Contributing to Students’ Willingness to Communicate during English Day Program. SALEE Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 4(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v4i2.845
Barrios, E., & Napiórkowska, M. (2024). Affective factors, intercultural sensitivity, and willingness to communicate orally outside class: A study with EFL secondary school learners in Poland and Spain. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241234225
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education.
Dastgoshadeh, A., & Javanmardi, P. (2021). Emotional intelligence as a predictor of EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Mextesol Journal, 45(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v45n3-4
Dewaele, J. (2019). The effect of classroom emotions, attitudes toward English, and teacher behavior on willingness to communicate among English foreign language learners. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(4), 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x19864996
Dewaele, J., & Pavelescu, L. M. (2021). The relationship between incommensurable emotions and willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language: a multiple case study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1675667
Dong, Y., Ahmad, N. K., & Nawi, N. R. C. (2023). Influencing factors of students’ willingness to communicate in English in the EFL classroom: a systematic review. Sains Humanika, 16(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v16n1.2068
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson
Grant, S. (2018). Effects of intensive EFL immersion programmes on willingness to communicate. Language Learning Journal, 48(4), 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1422274
Havwini, T. (2019). Indonesian EFL students’ willingness to communicate in the 2013 curriculum implementation: A case study. TEFLIN Journal - a Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 30(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v30i1/105-120
Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). The predicting role of EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviors in students’ willingness to communicate and academic engagement. BMC Psychology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01378-x
Lee, J. S. (2022). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(5), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319
Ma, H., Ismail, L., Noordin, N., & Razali, A. B. (2024). From EFL to ESL: unveiling willingness to communicate (WTC) in English among Chinese international students in a multilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2024.2425980
Ma, Y., Yu, S., Reynolds, B. L., & Jiang, L. (2021). A qualitative investigation of Chinese students’ willingness to communicate in English in the graduate school EMI classroom. English Teaching & Learning, 46(1), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00087-1
Macintyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: a situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
MacIntyre, P. D., & Wang, L. (2021). Willingness to communicate in the L2 about meaningful photos: Application of the pyramid model of WTC. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 878–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004645
Muñoz, C., & Cadierno, T. (2021). How do differences in exposure affect English language learning? A comparison of teenagers in two learning environments. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.2
Newport, E. L. (1990). Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1401_2
Nurfitriana, L., Basthomi, Y., & El Khoiri, N. (2024). Exploring Willingness to Communicate among Master's Students Majoring in English Education: What Makes It Different?. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 407-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.210 93/ijeltal.v9i2.1817
Peng, J. E. (2022). Willingness to communicate. In The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences (pp. 159-172). Routledge.
Punyaporn, P., & Soontornwipast, K. (2022). An exploration of students’ willingness to communicate in Thai EFL online classroom. Arab World English Journal, 8, 70–87. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.5
Rad, H. S. (2024). Revolutionizing L2 speaking proficiency, willingness to communicate, and perceptions through artificial intelligence: a case of Speeko application. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(4), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2309539
Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2019). Prioritization of critical individual factors influencing willingness to communicate: AHP method. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(6), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1521814
Rihardini, A. A., Yaniafari, R. P., & Mukminatien, N. (2021). Students willingness to communicate using English: A survey study. Paramasastra, 8(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.26740/paramasastra.v8n1.p75-94
Sadoughi, M., & Hejazi, S. Y. (2023). How can L2 motivational self system enhance willingness to communicate? The contribution of foreign language enjoyment and anxiety. Current Psychology, 43(3), 2173–2185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04479-3
Sarwari, K. (2024). Examining the role of L2 willingness to communicate in English language achievements: perspectives from Afghan university instructors. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2400428
Sawyer, S. M., Azzopardi, P. S., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. C. (2018). The age of adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2(3), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30022-1
Soyoof, A. (2023). Iranian EFL students’ perception of willingness to communicate in an extramural digital context. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5922– 5939. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2024579
Syed, H., & Kuzborska, I. (2018). Dynamics of factors underlying willingness to communicate in a second language. Language Learning Journal, 48(4), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1435709
Tai, T., & Chen, H. H. (2023). The impact of Google Assistant on adolescent EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1485–1502. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1841801
Tuyen, L., & Loan, T. T. T. (2019). Factors affecting EFL students’ willingness to communicate in speaking classes at the Vietnamese tertiary level. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 4(2), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.4.2.10
Unsiah, F., Mukminatien, N., Anugerahwati, M., Astuti, U. P., & Megawati, F. (2024). Students' Voices in English Medium Instruction Based on Lengths of English Exposure. MEXTESOL Journal, 48(2).
Widiati, U., Khoiri, N. E., Nindya, M. A., & Sharif, T. I. S. T. (2023). Exploring Strategies of Teaching Speaking among Indonesian and Malaysian Secondary English Teachers. Register Journal, 16(2), 286–300 https://doi.org/10.18326/register.v16i2.286-300
Xiao, Y., & Qiu, X. (2022). A study of the relationship between students’ global perspective and willingness to communicate in English at an English medium instruction university in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873766
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and Methods. SAGE.
Zhang, C., Meng, Y., & Ma, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. System, 121, 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103259
Zhao, D., Jablonkai, R. R., & Sandoval-Hernandez, A. (2024). Enhancing willingness to communicate in English among Chinese students in the UK: the impact of MALL with Duolingo and HelloTalk. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 4(1), 42–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2023-0027
Zhou, L., Xi, Y., & Lochtman, K. (2023). The relationship between second language competence and willingness to communicate: the moderating effect of foreign language anxiety. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 44(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1801697
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Afifah Marshalina, Nunung Suryati, Evynurul Laily Zen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
