Articles
A Pragmatic Analysis of English Teachers’ Speech Acts in Language Teaching: A Case Study at Smart Mataram Private Course
Share article
- Published
- 2025-06-16
- Pages
- 483-492
- Section
- Articles
Abstract
Effective classroom communication is a key component in successful language teaching, particularly in EFL contexts where teachers must navigate both linguistic and pedagogical goals. This study investigates the use of speech acts in classroom interactions, with a specific focus on an English teacher at Smart Mataram Private Course. The primary aim was to identify the types, frequency, and pedagogical functions of speech acts employed during instructional activities. Adopting a descriptive qualitative research design, the data were gathered through direct classroom observation, supplemented by audio and video recordings to ensure accuracy and depth of analysis. The collected data were analyzed using Searle’s taxonomy of speech acts, which categorizes language use into five types: directives, representatives, expressives, commissives, and declaratives. The findings revealed that directive speech acts dominated classroom interactions, comprising 43% of all utterances, followed by representatives (30%), expressives (17%), commissives (7%), and declaratives (3%). This distribution highlights the teacher’s reliance on directives for classroom control and instructional delivery, while representatives and expressives played important roles in conveying content and fostering student engagement. The study concludes that speech acts, particularly directives, are central to classroom discourse and serve distinct pedagogical purposes. It also suggests that enhancing teachers’ pragmatic awareness and communicative strategies can improve interactional effectiveness and learning outcomes. These findings have practical implications for teacher training programs, especially in private language institutions, by underlining the importance of speech act competence in supporting interactive and communicative language teaching.
Keywords
How to Cite
Putu Dewi Novita Sari, Arif Rahman, Lalu Mahsar, Barbara Arbaiza. (2025). A Pragmatic Analysis of English Teachers’ Speech Acts in Language Teaching: A Case Study at Smart Mataram Private Course. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 5(2), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i2.2813
References
Aini, Q., Hidayat, D. N., Husna, N., & Alek, A. (2023). Discourse Analysis of Directive Speech Acts Used by Teachers in Classroom Interactions. Journal of English Teaching. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v9i2.4566
Ardhianti, M., Susilo, J., Nurjamin, A., & Prawoto, E. C. (2023). Hedges and Boosters in Student Scientific Articles within the Framework of a Pragmatic Metadiscourse. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(4), 626. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i4.9018
Baicchi, A., & Iza Erviti, A. (2018). Genre as cognitive construction: An analysis of discourse connectors in academic lectures. Pragmatics & Cognition, 25(3), 576–601. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19006.bai
Bardorfer, A. (2024). Fostering Students’ Active Participation in Higher Education: The Role of Teacher-student Rapport. Athens Journal of Education, 11(3), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.11-3-4
Darong, H. C. (2024). Enhancing English as a Foreign Language Teacher’s Understanding on Illocutionary Acts. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 21(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v21i1.7207
Doris, Chasokela. (2024). 1. Qualitative Methodologies to Understanding Research. Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series, http://doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6021-7.ch013
Ernest, Negou., Marcellus, Nkenganyi, Fonkem., Jude, Suh, Abenwi., Ibrahima. (2023). 3. Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences. International Journal of scientific research and management, http://doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v11i09.sh01
Fatmawati, F., & Ningsih, R. (2024). Politeness in Expressive Speech Acts: A Cyber Pragmatics Approach. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1721. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.12620
Haritsyah, Y., Sawirman, S., & Zulprianto, Z. (2024). A Systemic Functional Linguistic Analysis of Mood Structures in News Coverage of Anies Baswedan’s Speech During Presidential Election Debates in The Jakarta Post and TEMPO.CO. JSEH (Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora). https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v10i3.659
Idris, A. M. S., Gusnawaty, G., Hasjim, M., & Kamsinah, K. (2023). The Lecturers and Students’ Speech Act Used in Classroom Interaction: A Case Study. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.v30i1.55300
Islami, M. F., Nasir, N., & Mujiati, M. (2024). Perbandingan Kualitas Pendidikan Antara Sekolah Negeri Dan Sekolah Swasta: Eksplorasi Pada Aspek Pembelajaran. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(2), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2024.v11.i2.p183-196
Insyra, Z. S., & Supri, I. Z. (2024). Pragmatics Analysis of Directive Illocutionary Acts in Spider-Man: No Way Home Movie. English Journal Literacy Utama, 8(2), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.v8i2.259
Jennifer, A., Wade-Berg. (2022). 5. Observation. http://doi:10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_25
Locher, M. A. (2024). Politeness. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0916.pub3
Leffi, Noviyenti., Khairul, Anwar. (2023). 4. Understanding Pragmatics as a Way to Practice Natural Communication Skills in Various Contexts of Interactions. Al-Ishlah, http://doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.3243
Micleu?anu, Z., & Tomailî, N. (2022). Representative aspects in defining the communication process. Vector European: Revist? ?tiin?ifico-Practic?, 1. https://doi.org/10.52507/2345-1106.2022-1.26
Merabti, S. (2022). The logical structure of language: from speech acts to ?the establishment of social reality in the philosophy of ??"jean searle"?. RIMAK International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 04(02), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.47832/2717-8293.16.16
Nikiforidou, K. (2018). Genre and constructional analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition, 25(3), 543–575. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18022.nik
Nur, Aisyah, Karim., Didin, Nuruddin, Hidayat., Nida, Husna., Alek, Alek. (2024). 2. A speech acts analysis of teachers' talk in english for young learners class. Academic Journal Perspective, http://doi:10.33603/xvyrfk95
Ruswandi, R., & Arief, M. (2024). Inspiring Through Interaction: The Impact of Teachers’ Verbal and Non-Verbal Communication in EFL Classes. VELES (Voices of English Language Education Society). https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i2.26821
Saroj, Aryal. (2024). 2. Use and Importance of Qualitative Research in School Education. The Educator Journal, http://doi:10.3126/tej.v12i1.64914
Shukurova, A. J. (2024). The impact of positive emotions in facilitating language acquisition: Strategies for effective language instruction. World Journal Of Advanced Research and Reviews, 24(3), 861–863. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.3.3742
Tindak, P., Pembelajaran, D., Prasetyawan, A., Santoso, Y. I., Primadoni, A. B., Hidayah, N., & Akhmad, S. M. (2022). Penggunaan Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v1i2.1493
Teeba, Khalid, Shehab. (2024). 3. A Pragmatic Study of Speech Acts in Fitzgerald’s ‘Crazy Sunday’ in terms of Searle’s Classification. Journal of College of Arts, http://doi:10.32792/tqartj.v1i45.551
Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod
Yanti, et al. (2021). The analysis of speech acts used by EFL teachers in classroom interaction at SMAN 2 Mataram in the academic year 2021/2022. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(5).
Zhong, Y. (2024). Research on Teaching Strategies Based on Second Language Acquisition Theory. Communications in Humanities Research, 51(1), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/51/20242526