Unveiling the Preferred Methods in Grammar Learning: Beliefs from EFL Undergraduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i2.2855Keywords:
Grammar teaching-learning, Individual learning preferences, EFL undergraduatesAbstract
Due to its fluidity, learners’ beliefs in English language teaching (ELT) have long been a topic of discussion among scholars. This paper sheds light on what learners believe about grammar learning. This study involved forty-five undergraduate students from the English language education (ELE) department in five different universities in East Java, Indonesia. Then, using a survey design, the current investigation aims to reveal the beliefs of undergraduates concerning instructional methods they prefer while learning grammar in the classroom. Data were collected through a questionnaire covering statements representing form- and meaning-focused instruction, focus on form and focus on forms instruction, implicit and explicit instruction, deductive and inductive instruction. The questionnaire results were analyzed using descriptive statistics to facilitate the interpretation of numerical findings. Based on empirical evidence, it was found that Indonesian EFL undergraduates prefer methods that give them a central focus on grammar, such as form-focused instruction, focus on forms, explicit instruction, and deductive instruction. Furthermore, this study offers valuable insights into how teachers in higher education can effectively teach grammar to students by considering their individual learning preferences.
Downloads
References
Alzahrani, I. H. (2024). Exploring learners’ beliefs on grammar learning: Importance and preferred methods. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(5), 1475-1485. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.20
Aman, N. (2020). Teaching grammar: Issues and challenges. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (JELTIM), 2(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v2i1.40032
Boone Jr, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. The Journal of extension, 50(2), 48. https://open.clemson.edu/joe/vol50/iss2/48/
Daloglu, A. (2020). EFL students' beliefs about how they learn grammar best. English Language Teaching, 13(10), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n10p158
Fauzi, K. R. R., Munawaroh, H., & Sulistyaningsih (2024). Improving students’ English grammar through incorporating games. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 15(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v15i1.322
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson.
Graus, J., & Coppen, P. A. (2015). Student teacher beliefs on grammar instruction. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 571-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815603237
Hendriani, S. (2018). Grammar teaching method preferred by Indonesian students. Asian EFL Journal, 20(11), 83-96.
Ismail, D. A. I., Basthomi, Y., & Karmina, S. (2023). Students’ perceptions and experiences about the combined inductive-deductive approach in intermediate grammar class. International Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), 66-78. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v5i1.1046
Komara, C., & Tiarsiwi, F. (2021). Exploring Indonesian EFL learners’ perception of English learning grammar. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(2), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v6i2.564
Li, S. (2022). On the role of English as a foreign language learners’ individual differences in their use of grammar learning strategies. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853158
Lindner, J. R, & Lindner, N. J. (2024). Interpreting likert-type scales, summated scales, unidimensional scales, and attitudinal scales: I neither agree nor disagree, likert or not. Advancements in Agricultural Development, 5(2), 152-163.
Ling, Z. (2015). Explicit grammar and implicit grammar teaching for English major students in university. Sino-US English Teaching, 12(8), 556-560. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2015.08.002
Manivannan, M. L., & Nadesan, N. K. (2023). Match or mismatch? Differentiation strategies preferred by students and applied by teachers. Proceedings of International Conference of Research on Language Education (I-RoLE 2023), 13-14 March, 2023, Noble Resort Hotel Melaka, Malaysia, 7, 250–263. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23097.23
Nur, S. (2020). Students’ perception toward the use of deductive and inductive approaches in teaching English grammar. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 6-19. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1257213
Paskarena, M. I., & Mukti, T. W. P. (2024). Students' voices on effective teaching methods for grammar learning in peer tutoring program. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 11(2), 849-875. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i2.2904
Pawlak, M. (2019). Grammar learning strategies as a key to mastering second language grammar: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 53(3), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000314
Pusparini, R., Widiati, U., & Susanti, A. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about English language teaching and learning in EFL classroom: A review of literature. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 147-154. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.1212
Qiao, C. (2024). Factors influencing second language learning based on the research of Lightbown and Spada. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1347691
Sabita, M., Pujiawati, N., & Miftakh, F. M. F. (2024). An analysis of teacher beliefs and practices in grammar teaching: A case study of EFL high school teachers. Journal of Educational Sciences, 833-846. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.8.4.p.833-846
Saengboon, S., Kosin, P., & Toomaneejinda, A. (2022). The roles of grammar in English language teaching: Local viewpoints. Pasaa, 63(1), 179-204. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/pasaa/vol63/iss1/7/
Samperio, S. N. (2017). Discovering students' preference for classroom activities and teachers' frequency of activity use. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.9292
Storch, N. (2018). Meaning?focused versus form?focused instruction. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0690
Vakili, P., & Mohammed, R. (2020). “Grammar scares me”: An exploration of American students' perceptions of grammar learning. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(12), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Anisah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
