Exploring the Role of Peer Feedback in Enhancing EFL Learners’ English Speaking Fluency and Accuracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i2.2868Keywords:
Peer feedback, Speaking fluency, Speaking accuracy, Collaborative learning, Language acquisitionAbstract
The ability to speak fluently and accurately in English remains a central goal for learners in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. However, limited classroom time and teacher-centered approaches often hinder opportunities for meaningful oral practice. This study investigates the impact of peer feedback as a pedagogical strategy to enhance fluency and accuracy in English speaking among EFL learners. The research aimed to examine not only linguistic development but also the broader cognitive and motivational effects of peer interaction. A mixed-methods design was employed, involving both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The participants were EFL learners who underwent a structured peer feedback intervention. Data were collected through pre- and post-tests, peer feedback forms, classroom observations, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in both fluency and accuracy after the intervention. Qualitative findings highlighted increased metacognitive awareness, motivation, and active engagement, as learners critically reflected on their performance and collaborated with peers. Notably, gender-based differences in feedback styles added depth to the peer learning dynamic. While the study was limited by its short duration and relatively homogeneous participant proficiency, the findings affirm the effectiveness of peer feedback in promoting oral communication skills. It is concluded that peer feedback fosters learner autonomy and supports linguistic and interpersonal growth. The study recommends incorporating peer feedback into EFL speaking curricula and suggests that future research explore its long-term impacts, involve diverse proficiency levels, and utilize technological tools to optimize feedback practices.
Downloads
References
Alshahrani, S. (2023). Effective peer feedback practices in EFL classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 67–85. https://erj.example.org/article/alshahrani2023
Amerian, M., & Tajabadi, A. (2020). The Role of Culture in Foreign Language Teaching Textbooks: An Evaluation of “New Headway” Series from an Intercultural Perspective. Intercultural Education, 31(6), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2020.1747291
Aprianoto, A., & Haerazi, H. (2019). Development and Assessment of an Interculture-based Instrument Model in the Teaching of Speaking Skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(12), 2796–2805. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071230
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Cahyani, S., Al-Qasri, S., & Ofara, W. (2023). Investigating English Teachers’ Communicative Strategies and Learning Feedback in Constructing Classroom Discourses of EFL Learners. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 3(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v3i1.1081
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2021). The Feedback Companion: Facilitating Effective Feedback in Higher Education. Routledge.
Cho, K., & Cho, M. H. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Derakhshan, A., Khalili, A. N., & Beheshti, F. (2016). Developing EFL learners’ speaking skills through dynamic assessment: A case study of Iranian learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.3p.1
Dörnyei, Z. (2021). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fadli, K., Irawan, L. A., & Haerazi, H. (2022). English Teachers’ Feedback on Students’ Writing Work in the New Normal Era: Teachers’ Feedback; Writing Skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 1(2), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v1i2.624
Faridah, S., Ahmad, D., & Yusuf, M. (2020). Investigating EFL students' attitudes towards peer feedback in writing classes. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i1.13816
Ha, P. L., et al. (2021). Teacher Feedback and Student Learning in EFL Classrooms: Perspectives from Southeast Asia. Springer.
Haerazi, H. (2023). Mobile-Assisted Flipped Learning Integrated with Metacognitive Skills in the Teaching of Speaking and Listening Skills. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7(3), 632–651. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.7.3.632-651
Haerazi, H., Prayati, Z., & Vikasari, R. M. (2019). Practicing Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Approach to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension in Relation to Motivation. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v8i1.2011
Hamidi, H., Babajani Azizi, D., & Kazemian, M. (2022). The Effect of Direct Oral Corrective Feedback on Motivation to Speak and Speaking Accuracy of EFL Learners. Education & Self Development, 17(3), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.17.3.05
Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Longman.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hidayatulloh, S. M. M. (2023). Learning English pronunciation: Articulating EFL students’ voices on problems and strategies. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka)?: Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 7(2), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v7i2.8496
Isaacs, T., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Deconstructing comprehensibility: Identifying the linguistic influences on listeners' L2 comprehensibility ratings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 475–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000150
Jupri, J., Mismardiana, Muslim, & Haerazi, H. (2022). Teaching English Using Two Stay Two Stray in Improving Students’ English Speaking Skills Integrated with Foreign Language Anxiety. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v2i1.719
Kinasih, P. R., & Olivia, O. (2022). An Analysis of Using Movies to Enhance Students’ Public Speaking Skills in Online Class. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 10(3), 315. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v10i3.5435
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480700435X
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge University Press.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002
Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004
Mourad, M. (2023). Challenges of integrating technology in EFL classrooms in semi-urban Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 10(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.21009/IJEE.102.12
Muzaki, H., Susanto, G., Widyartono, D., Bonde, L., Moorthy, T. K., & Akhsani, I. (2024). Innovative M-Learning with Automatic Feedback: Enhancing Language Acquisition for Level 2 Indonesian Foreign Speakers (BIPA). Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1689. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.11851
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Noroozi, O., et al. (2021). Peer Feedback and Learning in Higher Education: A Practical Guide. Springer.
Pham, H., & Nguyen, T. (2023). Digital literacy and technology integration in EFL classrooms: Lessons from Southeast Asia. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 45–60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26916916
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching Listening and Speaking: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y. (2017). Video-based interaction, negotiation for comprehensibility, and second language speech learning: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 67(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12110
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Research agenda. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000356
Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047
Storch, N. (2010). Critical Feedback on Written Corrective Feedback Research. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119181
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2015). Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Education: An Introduction through Narratives. Multilingual Matters.
Teng, F. (2020). The benefits of peer feedback in EFL writing classrooms: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818816200
Teng, F., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Peer feedback and the learning of EFL writing: Investigating the effects of feedback giver’s level of proficiency and feedback type. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65, 100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100871
Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. Pearson Longman.
Topping, K. (2019). Peer Assessment: Learning by Judging and Discussing the Work of Other Learners. Routledge.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass.
Van Beuningen, C. (2010). Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119171
Xianwei, G., Samuel, M., & Asmawi, A. (2016). A Model Of Critical Peer Feedback To Facilitate Business English Writing Using Qzone Weblogs Among Chinese Undergraduates. 4, 17. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet
Xu, Q., Dong, X., & Jiang, L. (2017). EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Mobile-Assisted Feedback on Oral Production. TESOL Quarterly, 51(2), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.335
Yu, S., & Hu, G. (2017). Can higher-proficiency L2 learners benefit from peer feedback? TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 1038–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.338
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000161
Yu, S. (2019). Digital peer feedback in second language writing: New insights and directions. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 21–36. https://www.lltjournal.org/item/yu2019
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005
Zou, D., & Lambert, J. (2017). Feedback methods for student voice in the digital age: Feedback methods for student voice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12522
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Agus Setiawan, Arif Rahman, Jupri Jupri, Mohammed Meraj
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
