Rewriting the End: Narrative Reclamation and Posthuman Hope in MaddAddam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i3.3253Keywords:
Margaret atwood, MaddAddam, Storytelling and Survival, Posthumanism, Feminist ecocriticismAbstract
This article explores how Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam (2013), the concluding volume of her speculative fiction trilogy, reconfigures post-apocalyptic narrative through storytelling, posthuman ethics, and interspecies kinship. Departing from the dystopian tone of Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood, MaddAddam turns toward cultural reconstruction and narrative continuity in the wake of ecological and societal collapse. The study adopts a qualitative, interpretive methodology rooted in close textual analysis, guided by posthumanist theory, feminist ecocriticism, and narrative theory. Particular attention is given to Toby’s reluctant but evolving role as storyteller, the Crakers’ reinterpretation of human memory into myth, and the novel’s depiction of interspecies alliances. The findings demonstrate that Atwood reframes survival not as individual endurance or technological mastery, but as a collective process of narrative reclamation. Storytelling emerges as an adaptive cultural practice that allows trauma to be processed, memory to be shared, and new ethical frameworks to be negotiated across human and nonhuman communities. The novel challenges anthropocentric hierarchies and patriarchal models of resilience, foregrounding instead relationality, care, and interdependence. It also illustrates how myth-making, far from being regressive, becomes a generative mode of continuity that sustains both human survivors and posthuman beings like the Crakers. Ultimately, MaddAddam refuses narrative closure, offering instead a vision of speculative regeneration in which memory, myth, and storytelling constitute the most enduring legacies of humanity. In doing so, Atwood positions narrative itself as a vital resource for imagining livable futures in the aftermath of catastrophe.
Downloads
References
Alaimo, S. (2010). Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Indiana University Press.
Atwood, M. (2011, Oct 14). Margaret Atwood: The road to Ustopia. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/oct/14/margaret-atwood-road-to-ustopia
Atwood, M. (2013). MaddAddam. Nan A. Talese / Doubleday.
Baelo-Allué, S., & Calvo-Pascual, M. (Eds.). (2021). Transhumanism and posthumanism in twenty-first century narrative. Routledge.
Bal, M. (2009). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (3rd ed., C. van Boheemen, Trans.). University of Toronto Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
Canavan, G. (2012). Hope, But Not for Us: Ecological Science Fiction and the End of the World in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, 23(2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2012.676914
DeLoughrey, E. (2019). Allegories of the Anthropocene. Duke University Press.
Ferrando, F. (2024). The art of being posthuman: Who are we in the 21st century? Polity Press.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Heise, U. K. (2016). Imagining extinction: The cultural meanings of endangered species. University of Chicago Press.
Hengen, S., & Thomson, A. (2007). Margaret Atwood: A reference guide, 1988–2005. Scarecrow Press.
Howells, C. A. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge companion to Margaret Atwood. Cambridge University Press.
Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. Columbia University Press.
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental culture: The ecological crisis of reason. Routledge.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans.; Vol. 1). University of Chicago Press.
Thomsen, M. R., & Wamberg, J. (Eds.). (2020). The Bloomsbury handbook of posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic.
White, H. (1987). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Wolfe, C. T. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zakiyah Tasnim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
