ChatGPT Assisted in EFL Cause and Effect Essays: A Lesson from EFL Academic Writing Context
Authors
-
Anninda Lutfhi Pramuditha
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi
-
Rulik Setiani
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v6i2.4665Keywords:
Academic writing, Cause-and-effect essay, ChatGPT, Writing accuracyAbstract
The growing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in EFL academic writing, particularly ChatGPT, has changed how students generate and organize written texts. However, it remains unclear how academic writing components organization, logical development of ideas/content, grammar, punctuation, spelling, and mechanics, and style and quality of expressions are manifested in ChatGPT-assisted essays and which components are most and least evident, especially in cause-and-effect essays that require clear logical relationships. This study aims to examine how academic writing components are manifested in ChatGPT-assisted cause-and-effect essays and to identify which components are most and least evident. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach using Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) with a deductive orientation. The participants were 21 third-semester students of the English Education Study Program at Universitas Muhammadiyah Kotabumi who used ChatGPT in writing their cause-and-effect essays. The researcher used an analytical writing rubric adapted from Brown (2004) as the research instrument. The data were analyzed through data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings show that all components are present but appear at different levels of consistency. Organization and logical development of ideas/content emerge as the most evident components, style and quality of expression appear at a moderate level, while grammar and punctuation, spelling, and mechanics remain the least evident. These findings indicate that ChatGPT supports idea organization and development more effectively than grammatical and mechanical accuracy. The results demonstrate that ChatGPT facilitates students in organizing and developing ideas. However, it does not fully ensure grammatical accuracy or effective revision. Therefore, students should position ChatGPT as a supporting tool while continuously improving their language accuracy and revising their writing.
Downloads
References
Aprilia, B., Puspitasari, I., & Khalawi, H. (2022). An Analysis of Students’ Grammatical Errors in Constructing Cause and Effect Essay by Using Wps Office Media at the Third Grade Students of SMKN Ngadirojo. In A. Burhanuddin, R. D. T. W. Widoyoko, R. K. Astuti, N. I. Meifiani, M. I. Purnamasari, H. A. Pianto, & M. L. Famukhit (Eds.), International Conference on Learning and Education (ICLE) (Vol. 1, Issue July, pp. 61–67). Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Press STKIP PGRI Pacitan (LPPM Press STKIP PGRI Pacitan) Jalan Cut Nyak Dien No 4A Ploso Pacitan. https://icle.stkippacitan.ac.id
Auliya, P. K., & Amrullah, Q. L. (2024). Analyzing the Flow of Ideas in University Students ’ Cause and Effect Essay. IRJ: Innovation Research Journal, 5(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30587/innovation.v5i1.7619.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. Pearson Education.
Chura-quispe, G., & Castro, R. A. G. (2024). A Techno-Pedagogical Design for the Production of Academic Essays in University Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14022
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Fayez, F., & Al-shami, S. A. (2023). Computers and Education : Artificial Intelligence Analyzing the students ’ views , concerns , and perceived ethics about chat GPT usage. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5(October), 100–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180
Kathuri, R. W., Mulwa, P. K., & Kahiga, R. M. (2025). The Impact of ChatGPT-Based Learning Support on English Essay Writing Skills Among Undergraduate Students at the University of Nairobi , Kenya. Higher Education Research, 10(5), 197–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20251005.13
Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2023). Qualitative content analysis: Methods, practice, and software (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Luh, N., Meka, P., Nazira, A., & Yulia, Y. (2025). Empowering Academic Writing Through AI : A Systematic Review of Benefits and Challenges Impact. 5(3), 785–795. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v5i3.3024
Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students ’ writing : EFL teachers ’ perspective The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students ’ writing : EFL teachers ’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2236469
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Özdere, M. (2025). AI in Academic Writing : Assessing the Effectiveness , Grading Consistency , and Student Perspectives of ChatGPT and You . com for EFL Students To cite this article : AI in Academic Writing : Assessing the Effectiveness , Grading Consistency , and Student. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 8(1), 123–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1001
Saputra, R. (2023). Students’ Error Analysis in Writing Essay of English Language Teaching. Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal), 4(1), 252–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56667/dejournal.v4i1.912
Saumi, R. I., Annazah, S., Wulandari, W., & Syahid, A. (2025). Investigating the Quality of Indonesian EFL Essay Writing at the University Level. Channing: Journal of English Language Education and Literature, 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30599/dbg7q216
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation : assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1260843). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
Sugiyono, P. D. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Susnjak, T., Sciences, C., & Zealand, N. (2022). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
Toba, R., Noor Noviana, W., & Sanu, O. La. (2019). The Current Issues of Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Skills: Ability, Problem, and Reason in Writing Comparison and Contrast Essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 19(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506
Wahyuddin, Hasman, & Idris, A. R. (2023). Implementation of ChatGPT on English Class Essay Writing Skills in University Students. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(4), 700–707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i4.31424
Wijaya, M. S. (2017). Students ’ Thesis Statement in Essay Writing Class. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 10(2), 274–290. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v10i2.1751
William, F. A. K. (2024). AI in Academic Writing: Ally or Foe? International Journal of Research Publications, 148(1), 353–358. https://doi.org/10.47119/10.47119/IJRP1001481520246427
Wulyani, A. N., Widiati, U., & Muniroh, S. (2024). LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.7966
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anninda Lutfhi Pramuditha, Rulik Setiani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with JOLLS agree to the following terms:
- For all articles published in JOLLS, copyright is retained by the authors. Authors permit the publisher to announce the work with conditions. When the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors agree to implement a non-exclusive transfer of publishing rights to the journals.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
